基于TOPSIS的联盟利益分配研究

Y. Qiang, Yang Jing
{"title":"基于TOPSIS的联盟利益分配研究","authors":"Y. Qiang, Yang Jing","doi":"10.1109/GSIS.2009.5408160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different partners always prefer different kinds of benefit allocation methods from individual perspectives when a dynamic alliance distributes its cooperation incomes. Hence, the members of the dynamic alliance may have disagreements with others, which may cause the failure of the cooperation. This paper designs a comprehensive benefit allocation solution to incorporate different results of traditional benefits allocation method into a more reasonable one. This research also found that using the method of approximating positive ideal point and that of approximating negative ideal point will have different results. We suggest that the selection of these two ways for the alliance depends on whether it is pessimistic or optimistic.","PeriodicalId":294363,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services (GSIS 2009)","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on alliance benefit allocation using TOPSIS\",\"authors\":\"Y. Qiang, Yang Jing\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GSIS.2009.5408160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Different partners always prefer different kinds of benefit allocation methods from individual perspectives when a dynamic alliance distributes its cooperation incomes. Hence, the members of the dynamic alliance may have disagreements with others, which may cause the failure of the cooperation. This paper designs a comprehensive benefit allocation solution to incorporate different results of traditional benefits allocation method into a more reasonable one. This research also found that using the method of approximating positive ideal point and that of approximating negative ideal point will have different results. We suggest that the selection of these two ways for the alliance depends on whether it is pessimistic or optimistic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services (GSIS 2009)\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services (GSIS 2009)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GSIS.2009.5408160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services (GSIS 2009)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GSIS.2009.5408160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动态联盟在分配合作收益时,不同的合作伙伴从个体角度出发,往往会选择不同的利益分配方式。因此,动态联盟的成员之间可能存在分歧,从而导致合作的失败。本文设计了一种综合效益分配方案,将传统效益分配方法的不同结果融合为更合理的效益分配方案。研究还发现,逼近正理想点的方法与逼近负理想点的方法会产生不同的结果。我们认为,选择这两种方式的联盟取决于是悲观还是乐观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on alliance benefit allocation using TOPSIS
Different partners always prefer different kinds of benefit allocation methods from individual perspectives when a dynamic alliance distributes its cooperation incomes. Hence, the members of the dynamic alliance may have disagreements with others, which may cause the failure of the cooperation. This paper designs a comprehensive benefit allocation solution to incorporate different results of traditional benefits allocation method into a more reasonable one. This research also found that using the method of approximating positive ideal point and that of approximating negative ideal point will have different results. We suggest that the selection of these two ways for the alliance depends on whether it is pessimistic or optimistic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信