猪肉生产中沙门氏菌控制的激励机制

G. Backus, R. King
{"title":"猪肉生产中沙门氏菌控制的激励机制","authors":"G. Backus, R. King","doi":"10.3921/978-90-8686-705-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Today's business environment is characterized by challenges of strong global competition where companies tend to achieve leanness and maximum responsiveness to customer demand. Lean supply chain networks are vulnerable to all kind of disruptions. For food supply chain networks (FSCNs), due to their inherent characteristics on the one hand and increased level of complexity, dynamics and uncertainty on the other hand, this vulnerability is even stronger. Therefore, methods are needed to design FSCNs in a robust way, i.e. they should be a ble to continue to fu nction in the event of disruption as well as in normal business environment. Methodology/approach: We conducted a systematic search in scientific literature up to 2008, also including books, monographs, doctoral theses and working papers. We searched in databases Scopus, Scirius and Google Scholar and defined the relevant keywords and criteria for article selection. Next, we performed content analySiS of all selected articles. The main criterion for article selection was a definition or explanation of the word 'robust' or 'robustness: In the end we selected 60 publications of which 35 publications were related to supply chain management (SCM) issues. Findings: In this paper a review is given of how the concept of robustness is perceived in scientific literature and how it is modeled. Focus is on the FSCN context, but due to available literature we also explore neighboring fields. We conclude that supply chain network (SCN) robustness should be more precisely defined and related to certain business key performance indicators (not only to financial ones) to guide SCN improvement programs. Next to that, there is a need for a systematic overview of (re)design strategies that may improve SCN robustness (and considers all elements of SCN design) and a list of appropriate criteria to support the selection of the right strategy in a speCific case. Practical implications: FSCN have become more vulnerable to uncertainties in the external environment. Increased insight in the concept of robustness can help businesses to mitigate the risks and design robust SCNs. Originality/value: The design of robust SCNs is getting more and more attention in literature but also in practice. There is a need for clear definitions and redesign s trategies to cope with the increased uncertainty, complexity and dynamics. This paper presents a new overview of the current state of understanding regarding the concept of robustness.","PeriodicalId":324908,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incentive Systems for Salmonella Control in Pork Production\",\"authors\":\"G. Backus, R. King\",\"doi\":\"10.3921/978-90-8686-705-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Today's business environment is characterized by challenges of strong global competition where companies tend to achieve leanness and maximum responsiveness to customer demand. Lean supply chain networks are vulnerable to all kind of disruptions. For food supply chain networks (FSCNs), due to their inherent characteristics on the one hand and increased level of complexity, dynamics and uncertainty on the other hand, this vulnerability is even stronger. Therefore, methods are needed to design FSCNs in a robust way, i.e. they should be a ble to continue to fu nction in the event of disruption as well as in normal business environment. Methodology/approach: We conducted a systematic search in scientific literature up to 2008, also including books, monographs, doctoral theses and working papers. We searched in databases Scopus, Scirius and Google Scholar and defined the relevant keywords and criteria for article selection. Next, we performed content analySiS of all selected articles. The main criterion for article selection was a definition or explanation of the word 'robust' or 'robustness: In the end we selected 60 publications of which 35 publications were related to supply chain management (SCM) issues. Findings: In this paper a review is given of how the concept of robustness is perceived in scientific literature and how it is modeled. Focus is on the FSCN context, but due to available literature we also explore neighboring fields. We conclude that supply chain network (SCN) robustness should be more precisely defined and related to certain business key performance indicators (not only to financial ones) to guide SCN improvement programs. Next to that, there is a need for a systematic overview of (re)design strategies that may improve SCN robustness (and considers all elements of SCN design) and a list of appropriate criteria to support the selection of the right strategy in a speCific case. Practical implications: FSCN have become more vulnerable to uncertainties in the external environment. Increased insight in the concept of robustness can help businesses to mitigate the risks and design robust SCNs. Originality/value: The design of robust SCNs is getting more and more attention in literature but also in practice. There is a need for clear definitions and redesign s trategies to cope with the increased uncertainty, complexity and dynamics. This paper presents a new overview of the current state of understanding regarding the concept of robustness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":324908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3921/978-90-8686-705-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3921/978-90-8686-705-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的:今天的商业环境的特点是强大的全球竞争的挑战,公司往往实现精益和最大的响应客户的需求。精益供应链网络容易受到各种中断的影响。对于食品供应链网络(FSCNs)而言,一方面由于其固有的特性,另一方面由于其复杂性、动态性和不确定性的增加,这种脆弱性更加强烈。因此,需要采用稳健的方法来设计fscn,即它们应该能够在中断的情况下以及在正常的商业环境中继续发挥作用。方法/方法:我们系统检索了截至2008年的科学文献,包括书籍、专著、博士论文和工作论文。我们在Scopus、scius和b谷歌Scholar数据库中进行检索,并定义了相关关键词和文章选择标准。接下来,我们对所有选择的文章进行内容分析。文章选择的主要标准是对“健壮”或“健壮”一词的定义或解释:最后,我们选择了60份出版物,其中35份出版物与供应链管理(SCM)问题有关。研究结果:本文回顾了稳健性的概念是如何在科学文献中被感知的,以及它是如何建模的。重点是在FSCN的背景下,但由于现有的文献,我们也探索邻近的领域。我们的结论是,供应链网络(SCN)的稳健性应该更精确地定义,并与某些业务关键绩效指标(不仅是财务指标)相关,以指导供应链网络改进计划。其次,需要系统地概述(重新)设计策略,以提高SCN的稳健性(并考虑SCN设计的所有元素),并列出适当的标准,以支持在特定情况下选择正确的策略。实际意义:FSCN越来越容易受到外部环境不确定性的影响。增强对健壮性概念的了解可以帮助企业减轻风险并设计健壮的scn。原创性/价值:鲁棒SCNs的设计在文献和实践中越来越受到关注。有必要明确定义并重新设计战略,以应对日益增加的不确定性、复杂性和动态性。本文对鲁棒性概念的理解现状进行了新的概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incentive Systems for Salmonella Control in Pork Production
Purpose: Today's business environment is characterized by challenges of strong global competition where companies tend to achieve leanness and maximum responsiveness to customer demand. Lean supply chain networks are vulnerable to all kind of disruptions. For food supply chain networks (FSCNs), due to their inherent characteristics on the one hand and increased level of complexity, dynamics and uncertainty on the other hand, this vulnerability is even stronger. Therefore, methods are needed to design FSCNs in a robust way, i.e. they should be a ble to continue to fu nction in the event of disruption as well as in normal business environment. Methodology/approach: We conducted a systematic search in scientific literature up to 2008, also including books, monographs, doctoral theses and working papers. We searched in databases Scopus, Scirius and Google Scholar and defined the relevant keywords and criteria for article selection. Next, we performed content analySiS of all selected articles. The main criterion for article selection was a definition or explanation of the word 'robust' or 'robustness: In the end we selected 60 publications of which 35 publications were related to supply chain management (SCM) issues. Findings: In this paper a review is given of how the concept of robustness is perceived in scientific literature and how it is modeled. Focus is on the FSCN context, but due to available literature we also explore neighboring fields. We conclude that supply chain network (SCN) robustness should be more precisely defined and related to certain business key performance indicators (not only to financial ones) to guide SCN improvement programs. Next to that, there is a need for a systematic overview of (re)design strategies that may improve SCN robustness (and considers all elements of SCN design) and a list of appropriate criteria to support the selection of the right strategy in a speCific case. Practical implications: FSCN have become more vulnerable to uncertainties in the external environment. Increased insight in the concept of robustness can help businesses to mitigate the risks and design robust SCNs. Originality/value: The design of robust SCNs is getting more and more attention in literature but also in practice. There is a need for clear definitions and redesign s trategies to cope with the increased uncertainty, complexity and dynamics. This paper presents a new overview of the current state of understanding regarding the concept of robustness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信