绿色供应链管理实践的制度压力与实践评估:一个概念框架

H. Ali, Oulfarsi Salah
{"title":"绿色供应链管理实践的制度压力与实践评估:一个概念框架","authors":"H. Ali, Oulfarsi Salah","doi":"10.1109/LOGISTIQUA55056.2022.9938068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ambiguity existing within metrics on drivers and green practices have pushed researchers, practitioners to increase their efforts so as to standardize and assess these measurements. Consequently, this paper proposes a conceptual holistic framework for green supply chain management drivers and practices assessment. Based on frequency analysis, The results indicates that among all institutional pressures used by scholars that normative pressures are the most cited followed by coercive and mimetic pressures respectively. Moreover, internal and external green supply chain management practices have been identified, the most investigated ones are respectively as follow Green Purchasing (GP), Eco-design (ECO-D), Internal Environmental Management (IEM), Cooperation with customer (CWC), Investment recovery (IR) and Reverse Logistics (RL).","PeriodicalId":253343,"journal":{"name":"2022 14th International Colloquium of Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional pressures & practices assessement for green supply chain management practices: A conceptual framework\",\"authors\":\"H. Ali, Oulfarsi Salah\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LOGISTIQUA55056.2022.9938068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ambiguity existing within metrics on drivers and green practices have pushed researchers, practitioners to increase their efforts so as to standardize and assess these measurements. Consequently, this paper proposes a conceptual holistic framework for green supply chain management drivers and practices assessment. Based on frequency analysis, The results indicates that among all institutional pressures used by scholars that normative pressures are the most cited followed by coercive and mimetic pressures respectively. Moreover, internal and external green supply chain management practices have been identified, the most investigated ones are respectively as follow Green Purchasing (GP), Eco-design (ECO-D), Internal Environmental Management (IEM), Cooperation with customer (CWC), Investment recovery (IR) and Reverse Logistics (RL).\",\"PeriodicalId\":253343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 14th International Colloquium of Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 14th International Colloquium of Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LOGISTIQUA55056.2022.9938068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 14th International Colloquium of Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LOGISTIQUA55056.2022.9938068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

司机和绿色实践指标中存在的模糊性促使研究人员、实践者加大努力,以便对这些测量进行标准化和评估。因此,本文提出了绿色供应链管理驱动因素和实践评估的概念性整体框架。基于频率分析,结果表明,在学者们使用的所有制度压力中,规范性压力被引用最多,其次是强制性压力和模仿性压力。此外,内部和外部绿色供应链管理实践已被确定,调查最多的分别是以下绿色采购(GP)、生态设计(ECO-D)、内部环境管理(IEM)、客户合作(CWC)、投资回收(IR)和逆向物流(RL)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutional pressures & practices assessement for green supply chain management practices: A conceptual framework
The ambiguity existing within metrics on drivers and green practices have pushed researchers, practitioners to increase their efforts so as to standardize and assess these measurements. Consequently, this paper proposes a conceptual holistic framework for green supply chain management drivers and practices assessment. Based on frequency analysis, The results indicates that among all institutional pressures used by scholars that normative pressures are the most cited followed by coercive and mimetic pressures respectively. Moreover, internal and external green supply chain management practices have been identified, the most investigated ones are respectively as follow Green Purchasing (GP), Eco-design (ECO-D), Internal Environmental Management (IEM), Cooperation with customer (CWC), Investment recovery (IR) and Reverse Logistics (RL).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信