根据国际法院的法例,该州高级官员对严重侵犯人权的做法

N. Salsabila
{"title":"根据国际法院的法例,该州高级官员对严重侵犯人权的做法","authors":"N. Salsabila","doi":"10.20961/belli.v7i1.59989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the extend to the applicability of diplomatic immunity rights for senior officials against gross human rights violations they have committed. Toa achieve such aim, the author analysed the different types of immunity granted by international law to state officials, the reasons for the conferment of this immunity, and whether they apply in cases in which it is alleged that an official has committed an international crime. By using a statutory and case approach, the author examines several cases heard before international courts to compare the implementation of immunity rights. The author argues that both immunity ratione materiae and immunity ratione personae cannot be applied to cases that constitute gross violations of human rights. Moreover, instead did not agree with the argument which have been put forward by scholars and ICJ in support of the contrary.","PeriodicalId":124002,"journal":{"name":"BELLI AC PACIS","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRAKTIK HAK KEKEBALAN DIPLOMATIK PEJABAT SENIOR NEGARA TERHADAP PELANGGARAN BERAT HAM MENURUT YURISPRUDENSI PENGADILAN INTERNASIONAL\",\"authors\":\"N. Salsabila\",\"doi\":\"10.20961/belli.v7i1.59989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines the extend to the applicability of diplomatic immunity rights for senior officials against gross human rights violations they have committed. Toa achieve such aim, the author analysed the different types of immunity granted by international law to state officials, the reasons for the conferment of this immunity, and whether they apply in cases in which it is alleged that an official has committed an international crime. By using a statutory and case approach, the author examines several cases heard before international courts to compare the implementation of immunity rights. The author argues that both immunity ratione materiae and immunity ratione personae cannot be applied to cases that constitute gross violations of human rights. Moreover, instead did not agree with the argument which have been put forward by scholars and ICJ in support of the contrary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BELLI AC PACIS\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BELLI AC PACIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20961/belli.v7i1.59989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BELLI AC PACIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/belli.v7i1.59989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究审查高级官员对其严重侵犯人权行为的外交豁免权利的适用范围。为了实现这一目标,提交人分析了国际法赋予国家官员的不同类型的豁免、授予这种豁免的理由,以及这些豁免是否适用于据称官员犯下国际罪行的案件。提交人采用法定和个案的方法,审查了国际法院审理的若干案件,以比较豁免权利的实施情况。提交人认为,属事豁免和属人豁免都不能适用于构成严重侵犯人权的案件。此外,我不同意学者和国际法院提出的相反观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PRAKTIK HAK KEKEBALAN DIPLOMATIK PEJABAT SENIOR NEGARA TERHADAP PELANGGARAN BERAT HAM MENURUT YURISPRUDENSI PENGADILAN INTERNASIONAL
This study examines the extend to the applicability of diplomatic immunity rights for senior officials against gross human rights violations they have committed. Toa achieve such aim, the author analysed the different types of immunity granted by international law to state officials, the reasons for the conferment of this immunity, and whether they apply in cases in which it is alleged that an official has committed an international crime. By using a statutory and case approach, the author examines several cases heard before international courts to compare the implementation of immunity rights. The author argues that both immunity ratione materiae and immunity ratione personae cannot be applied to cases that constitute gross violations of human rights. Moreover, instead did not agree with the argument which have been put forward by scholars and ICJ in support of the contrary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信