对加密副本更新过程实验评估的思考

Kazuki Takayama, D. Kobayashi, H. Yokota
{"title":"对加密副本更新过程实验评估的思考","authors":"Kazuki Takayama, D. Kobayashi, H. Yokota","doi":"10.1109/ICDIM.2007.4444280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The secure storage systems adopting the encrypt-on-disk scheme, in which files are stored in cipher for efficient data transmission, need to re-encrypt files with new cryptographic keys when a revocation occurs. There are two re-encryption methods, namely active revocation in which the re-encryption is immediately performed and lazy revocation in which the re-encryption is delayed until the file is updated. There is the trade-off between performance and security because active revocation has the expense of immediate re-encryption, while lazy revocation is vulnerable during its re-encryption delay. We consider the environment in which re-encrypted file is pre-computed by using backup data in a parallel storage system effective for this issue. However, the performance of update is decreased on account of the difference of keys used in primary and backup. In this paper, we evaluate a method in which the differential data re-encrypted for backup are not written to the file but be kept on the memory in different key environment, and evaluate the different key environment in parallel storage by experiment.","PeriodicalId":198626,"journal":{"name":"2007 2nd International Conference on Digital Information Management","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consideration of experimental evaluation about encrypted replica update process\",\"authors\":\"Kazuki Takayama, D. Kobayashi, H. Yokota\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDIM.2007.4444280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The secure storage systems adopting the encrypt-on-disk scheme, in which files are stored in cipher for efficient data transmission, need to re-encrypt files with new cryptographic keys when a revocation occurs. There are two re-encryption methods, namely active revocation in which the re-encryption is immediately performed and lazy revocation in which the re-encryption is delayed until the file is updated. There is the trade-off between performance and security because active revocation has the expense of immediate re-encryption, while lazy revocation is vulnerable during its re-encryption delay. We consider the environment in which re-encrypted file is pre-computed by using backup data in a parallel storage system effective for this issue. However, the performance of update is decreased on account of the difference of keys used in primary and backup. In this paper, we evaluate a method in which the differential data re-encrypted for backup are not written to the file but be kept on the memory in different key environment, and evaluate the different key environment in parallel storage by experiment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 2nd International Conference on Digital Information Management\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 2nd International Conference on Digital Information Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2007.4444280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 2nd International Conference on Digital Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2007.4444280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

采用磁盘加密(encryption -on-disk)方案的安全存储系统以加密方式存储文件,以提高数据传输效率,但当文件被吊销时,需要使用新的加密密钥重新加密。有两种重新加密方法,即立即执行重新加密的主动撤销和延迟重新加密直到文件更新的惰性撤销。在性能和安全性之间存在权衡,因为主动撤销需要立即重新加密,而惰性撤销在其重新加密延迟期间容易受到攻击。我们考虑在一个有效的并行存储系统中使用备份数据来预先计算重新加密文件的环境。但是,由于主备份中使用的密钥不同,会降低更新的性能。本文对不同密钥环境下重新加密备份的差分数据不写入文件而保存在存储器中的方法进行了评价,并通过实验对不同密钥环境下并行存储的效果进行了评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consideration of experimental evaluation about encrypted replica update process
The secure storage systems adopting the encrypt-on-disk scheme, in which files are stored in cipher for efficient data transmission, need to re-encrypt files with new cryptographic keys when a revocation occurs. There are two re-encryption methods, namely active revocation in which the re-encryption is immediately performed and lazy revocation in which the re-encryption is delayed until the file is updated. There is the trade-off between performance and security because active revocation has the expense of immediate re-encryption, while lazy revocation is vulnerable during its re-encryption delay. We consider the environment in which re-encrypted file is pre-computed by using backup data in a parallel storage system effective for this issue. However, the performance of update is decreased on account of the difference of keys used in primary and backup. In this paper, we evaluate a method in which the differential data re-encrypted for backup are not written to the file but be kept on the memory in different key environment, and evaluate the different key environment in parallel storage by experiment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信