通过比较、同侪压力和自身利益来治理欧洲:作为国家教育政策的操作者的博洛尼亚评估过程

J. Krejsler, U. Olsson, K. Petersson
{"title":"通过比较、同侪压力和自身利益来治理欧洲:作为国家教育政策的操作者的博洛尼亚评估过程","authors":"J. Krejsler, U. Olsson, K. Petersson","doi":"10.18999/BULITV.9.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Bologna Process and the creation of a European Higher Education Area (EHEA) signify that European nations commit to making different education systems comparable and advancing quality by competition. Employing a governmentality lens, this article scrutinizes the Bologna Process as a set of transnational political technologies at work. The Open Method of Coordination appears as the key political technology to advance the Bologna Process. In a voluntarily based political process the OMC brings about a transnational forum by simultaneously catching national players between the lures of peer pressure and self-interest. This complex of advancing national educational policies by means of on-going and gradual transnational consensus-building is exemplified in analyses of the crucial 2009 Bologna Stocktaking Report and its context.","PeriodicalId":154366,"journal":{"name":"Vocational and Technical Education","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governing Europe by comparison, peer pressure & self-interest : On the Bologna Stocktaking Process as operator of national education policy\",\"authors\":\"J. Krejsler, U. Olsson, K. Petersson\",\"doi\":\"10.18999/BULITV.9.35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Bologna Process and the creation of a European Higher Education Area (EHEA) signify that European nations commit to making different education systems comparable and advancing quality by competition. Employing a governmentality lens, this article scrutinizes the Bologna Process as a set of transnational political technologies at work. The Open Method of Coordination appears as the key political technology to advance the Bologna Process. In a voluntarily based political process the OMC brings about a transnational forum by simultaneously catching national players between the lures of peer pressure and self-interest. This complex of advancing national educational policies by means of on-going and gradual transnational consensus-building is exemplified in analyses of the crucial 2009 Bologna Stocktaking Report and its context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vocational and Technical Education\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vocational and Technical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18999/BULITV.9.35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vocational and Technical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18999/BULITV.9.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

博洛尼亚进程和欧洲高等教育区(EHEA)的建立表明,欧洲国家致力于使不同的教育体系具有可比性,并通过竞争提高质量。本文从治理的角度审视博洛尼亚进程,认为它是一套发挥作用的跨国政治技术。开放的协调方法似乎是推进博洛尼亚进程的关键政治技术。在一个以自愿为基础的政治进程中,OMC通过同时在同侪压力和自身利益的诱惑之间抓住国家参与者,带来了一个跨国论坛。对2009年《博洛尼亚盘点报告》及其背景的分析,体现了通过持续和逐步的跨国共识建设来推进国家教育政策的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Governing Europe by comparison, peer pressure & self-interest : On the Bologna Stocktaking Process as operator of national education policy
The Bologna Process and the creation of a European Higher Education Area (EHEA) signify that European nations commit to making different education systems comparable and advancing quality by competition. Employing a governmentality lens, this article scrutinizes the Bologna Process as a set of transnational political technologies at work. The Open Method of Coordination appears as the key political technology to advance the Bologna Process. In a voluntarily based political process the OMC brings about a transnational forum by simultaneously catching national players between the lures of peer pressure and self-interest. This complex of advancing national educational policies by means of on-going and gradual transnational consensus-building is exemplified in analyses of the crucial 2009 Bologna Stocktaking Report and its context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信