五人制足球运动员技术测量测试的效度与信度

Agus Susworo Dwi Marhaendro, Suharjana Suharjana, S. Sujarwo
{"title":"五人制足球运动员技术测量测试的效度与信度","authors":"Agus Susworo Dwi Marhaendro, Suharjana Suharjana, S. Sujarwo","doi":"10.29407/js_unpgri.v9i1.19672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study tested the validity and reliability of the Futsal Skill Test (FST) for student actors. Twenty-four futsal players from the university's futsal team comprised men's (n=12) and women's (n=12) teams. The Futsal Skill Test (FST) is carried out on the futsal field and checks skills such as passing, controlling, dribbling, and shooting the ball as quickly as possible by making the minimum possible mistakes. The validity of the content is assessed using experienced futsal trainers and instructors. Data analysis in validity measurements was determined using known group differences between male and female university futsal players, then reliability was determined using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and variation coefficient (CV) between experimental repeats. The results showed that the variance equivalence test on Performance Time (Time Taken and Penalty Time) showed that F had been 0.048 (0.013 and 0.375) with a significance of 0.829 (0.910 and 0.547). Performance Time for men is different from that of female university players. T-test results for the quality of the means for Performance Time (Time Required and Penalty Time) t=-5.506 p=0.000 (t=-5.5277 p=0.000 and t=-2.060 p=0.051). The CV Time Taken, Penalty Time and Performance Time scores for male students were 6.97%, 28.46%, and 6.88%, for female students, were 6.81%, 19.63%, and 6.38%, both for male and female students were 6.89%, 24.04%, and 6.63%. The FST assessment is an apt score to describe the performance time, that the player with the faster time achieved from the futsal skill Test is more skilled. The Performance Time score consists of Time Taken and Penalty Time.","PeriodicalId":353164,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal SPORTIF : Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of futsal player skill measurement tests\",\"authors\":\"Agus Susworo Dwi Marhaendro, Suharjana Suharjana, S. Sujarwo\",\"doi\":\"10.29407/js_unpgri.v9i1.19672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study tested the validity and reliability of the Futsal Skill Test (FST) for student actors. Twenty-four futsal players from the university's futsal team comprised men's (n=12) and women's (n=12) teams. The Futsal Skill Test (FST) is carried out on the futsal field and checks skills such as passing, controlling, dribbling, and shooting the ball as quickly as possible by making the minimum possible mistakes. The validity of the content is assessed using experienced futsal trainers and instructors. Data analysis in validity measurements was determined using known group differences between male and female university futsal players, then reliability was determined using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and variation coefficient (CV) between experimental repeats. The results showed that the variance equivalence test on Performance Time (Time Taken and Penalty Time) showed that F had been 0.048 (0.013 and 0.375) with a significance of 0.829 (0.910 and 0.547). Performance Time for men is different from that of female university players. T-test results for the quality of the means for Performance Time (Time Required and Penalty Time) t=-5.506 p=0.000 (t=-5.5277 p=0.000 and t=-2.060 p=0.051). The CV Time Taken, Penalty Time and Performance Time scores for male students were 6.97%, 28.46%, and 6.88%, for female students, were 6.81%, 19.63%, and 6.38%, both for male and female students were 6.89%, 24.04%, and 6.63%. The FST assessment is an apt score to describe the performance time, that the player with the faster time achieved from the futsal skill Test is more skilled. The Performance Time score consists of Time Taken and Penalty Time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":353164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal SPORTIF : Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal SPORTIF : Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29407/js_unpgri.v9i1.19672\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal SPORTIF : Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29407/js_unpgri.v9i1.19672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在检验学生演员五人制足球技能测验(FST)的效度与信度。来自大学五人制足球队的24名球员包括男队(n=12)和女队(n=12)。五人制足球技术测试(FST)在五人制足球场上进行,通过尽可能少的失误来检验球员的传球、控球、带球和射门等技术。内容的有效性评估使用经验丰富的五人制教练和教练。效度测量的数据分析采用已知男女大学五人制足球运动员组间差异进行,信度测量采用Pearson相关系数(r)、班级内相关系数(ICC)和实验重复间变异系数(CV)进行。结果表明,Performance Time (Time Taken和Penalty Time)的方差等价检验显示F为0.048(0.013和0.375),显著性为0.829(0.910和0.547)。男性大学生运动员的上场时间与女性大学生运动员的上场时间不同。t检验结果表明,Performance Time (Time Required和Penalty Time)的质量均值t=-5.506 p=0.000 (t=-5.5277 p=0.000, t=-2.060 p=0.051)。男生的CV占用时间、罚分时间和绩效时间得分分别为6.97%、28.46%和6.88%,女生的CV占用时间、罚分时间和绩效时间得分分别为6.81%、19.63%和6.38%,男女学生的CV占用时间、罚分时间和绩效时间得分分别为6.89%、24.04%和6.63%。FST评估是一个恰当的分数来描述表现时间,在五人制技能测试中,时间越快的球员技术越好。表演时间得分包括用时和罚球时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and reliability of futsal player skill measurement tests
This study tested the validity and reliability of the Futsal Skill Test (FST) for student actors. Twenty-four futsal players from the university's futsal team comprised men's (n=12) and women's (n=12) teams. The Futsal Skill Test (FST) is carried out on the futsal field and checks skills such as passing, controlling, dribbling, and shooting the ball as quickly as possible by making the minimum possible mistakes. The validity of the content is assessed using experienced futsal trainers and instructors. Data analysis in validity measurements was determined using known group differences between male and female university futsal players, then reliability was determined using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and variation coefficient (CV) between experimental repeats. The results showed that the variance equivalence test on Performance Time (Time Taken and Penalty Time) showed that F had been 0.048 (0.013 and 0.375) with a significance of 0.829 (0.910 and 0.547). Performance Time for men is different from that of female university players. T-test results for the quality of the means for Performance Time (Time Required and Penalty Time) t=-5.506 p=0.000 (t=-5.5277 p=0.000 and t=-2.060 p=0.051). The CV Time Taken, Penalty Time and Performance Time scores for male students were 6.97%, 28.46%, and 6.88%, for female students, were 6.81%, 19.63%, and 6.38%, both for male and female students were 6.89%, 24.04%, and 6.63%. The FST assessment is an apt score to describe the performance time, that the player with the faster time achieved from the futsal skill Test is more skilled. The Performance Time score consists of Time Taken and Penalty Time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信