M. Leblebici, Berna Dincer, C. Savcı, Filiz Soyhan, O. Alımoglu
{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛强度评估:三种评分量表在评分和患者偏好方面的比较分析","authors":"M. Leblebici, Berna Dincer, C. Savcı, Filiz Soyhan, O. Alımoglu","doi":"10.46648/gnj.321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare three rating scales in assessment of postoperative pain intensity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy Methods: A total 102 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery were participated on a voluntary basis in this cross-sectional questionnaire survey. The questionnaire form elicited items on sociodemographic characteristics of patients, pain characteristics and the pain intensity assessment via three scales including Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS). Results: Mean(SD) VAS, VDS and NRS scores were 4.7(1.3), 2.8(0.7) and 4.5(1.2), respectively. VDS (67.6%) was the most commonly preferred scale by patients, as followed by VAS (23.5%) and NRS (8.8%). Positive significant correlations were noted between each scale (r: ranged from 0.809 between VAS and VDS to 0.865 between VDS and NRS, p<0.001 for each). There was a high level of inter-scale concordance overall (Cronbach's alpha: 0.910), including VAS x VDS (Cronbach's alpha: 0.820), VAS x NRS (Cronbach’s alpha=0.906) and VDS x NRS (Cronbach’s alpha=0.868). Conclusion: In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that all three scales (VAS, NRS, VDS) provide reliable and valid data with strong correlations and a high level of inter-scale concordance in assessing postoperative pain intensity in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. However, VDS appears to be the best scale in assessing pain intensity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery with respect to patient preference rates as well as its strong correlation with other scales, particularly the NRS.","PeriodicalId":394509,"journal":{"name":"Gevher Nesibe Journal IESDR","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of postoperative pain intensity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Comparative analysis of three rating scales in terms of scores and patient preferences\",\"authors\":\"M. Leblebici, Berna Dincer, C. Savcı, Filiz Soyhan, O. Alımoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.46648/gnj.321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare three rating scales in assessment of postoperative pain intensity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy Methods: A total 102 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery were participated on a voluntary basis in this cross-sectional questionnaire survey. The questionnaire form elicited items on sociodemographic characteristics of patients, pain characteristics and the pain intensity assessment via three scales including Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS). Results: Mean(SD) VAS, VDS and NRS scores were 4.7(1.3), 2.8(0.7) and 4.5(1.2), respectively. VDS (67.6%) was the most commonly preferred scale by patients, as followed by VAS (23.5%) and NRS (8.8%). Positive significant correlations were noted between each scale (r: ranged from 0.809 between VAS and VDS to 0.865 between VDS and NRS, p<0.001 for each). There was a high level of inter-scale concordance overall (Cronbach's alpha: 0.910), including VAS x VDS (Cronbach's alpha: 0.820), VAS x NRS (Cronbach’s alpha=0.906) and VDS x NRS (Cronbach’s alpha=0.868). Conclusion: In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that all three scales (VAS, NRS, VDS) provide reliable and valid data with strong correlations and a high level of inter-scale concordance in assessing postoperative pain intensity in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. However, VDS appears to be the best scale in assessing pain intensity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery with respect to patient preference rates as well as its strong correlation with other scales, particularly the NRS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gevher Nesibe Journal IESDR\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gevher Nesibe Journal IESDR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46648/gnj.321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gevher Nesibe Journal IESDR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46648/gnj.321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较三种评定量表对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛强度的评价。方法:对102例择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者自愿参与横断面问卷调查。问卷形式通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)、数值评定量表(NRS)、言语描述量表(VDS)三种量表对患者的社会人口学特征、疼痛特征和疼痛强度进行评估。结果:VAS、VDS、NRS平均评分分别为4.7(1.3)、2.8(0.7)、4.5(1.2)分。VDS评分占67.6%,VAS评分占23.5%,NRS评分占8.8%。各量表之间均存在显著正相关(r: VAS与VDS之间的r为0.809,VDS与NRS之间的r为0.865,p均<0.001)。量表间一致性总体较高(Cronbach's alpha: 0.910),包括VAS x VDS (Cronbach's alpha: 0.820)、VAS x NRS (Cronbach's alpha=0.906)和VDS x NRS (Cronbach's alpha=0.868)。结论:综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,VAS、NRS、VDS这三个量表在评估腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后疼痛强度方面提供了可靠有效的数据,且具有很强的相关性和高度的量表间一致性。然而,就患者偏好率而言,VDS似乎是评估腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛强度的最佳量表,并且与其他量表,特别是NRS有很强的相关性。
Assessment of postoperative pain intensity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Comparative analysis of three rating scales in terms of scores and patient preferences
Objective: To compare three rating scales in assessment of postoperative pain intensity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy Methods: A total 102 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery were participated on a voluntary basis in this cross-sectional questionnaire survey. The questionnaire form elicited items on sociodemographic characteristics of patients, pain characteristics and the pain intensity assessment via three scales including Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS). Results: Mean(SD) VAS, VDS and NRS scores were 4.7(1.3), 2.8(0.7) and 4.5(1.2), respectively. VDS (67.6%) was the most commonly preferred scale by patients, as followed by VAS (23.5%) and NRS (8.8%). Positive significant correlations were noted between each scale (r: ranged from 0.809 between VAS and VDS to 0.865 between VDS and NRS, p<0.001 for each). There was a high level of inter-scale concordance overall (Cronbach's alpha: 0.910), including VAS x VDS (Cronbach's alpha: 0.820), VAS x NRS (Cronbach’s alpha=0.906) and VDS x NRS (Cronbach’s alpha=0.868). Conclusion: In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that all three scales (VAS, NRS, VDS) provide reliable and valid data with strong correlations and a high level of inter-scale concordance in assessing postoperative pain intensity in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. However, VDS appears to be the best scale in assessing pain intensity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery with respect to patient preference rates as well as its strong correlation with other scales, particularly the NRS.