不同功率计算策略下并网变流器稳定性比较

Ziqi Zhou, S. Pugliese, M. Liserre
{"title":"不同功率计算策略下并网变流器稳定性比较","authors":"Ziqi Zhou, S. Pugliese, M. Liserre","doi":"10.1109/PEDG56097.2023.10215196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grid-forming (GFM) converters, such as virtual synchronous generators (VSGs), behave as voltage sources behind a reactance within a specified frequency range. Therefore, solutions to limit the rapid growth of the converter output current, which may cause over-current tripping during grid faults, are necessary. One effective solution is to use outer dual-loop voltage and current control so that current limitation can be realized by saturating the current reference. In the condition, electrical power (EP) of VSG can be calculated either with the converter output current or with the virtual current from the voltage loop, leading to different small-signal stability for the GFM converter. In this paper, small-signal stability of these two EP calculation methods are analysed and compared. Small-signal eigenvalues analysis shows that using virtual current from outer voltage loop for EP calculation contributes to better small-signal stability as compared to the conventional EP calculation approach, under both the weak grid and the strong grid conditions. Simulation results are provided to validate the effectiveness of the analysis.","PeriodicalId":386920,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability Comparison of Grid-Forming Converters with Different Power Calculation Strategies\",\"authors\":\"Ziqi Zhou, S. Pugliese, M. Liserre\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PEDG56097.2023.10215196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Grid-forming (GFM) converters, such as virtual synchronous generators (VSGs), behave as voltage sources behind a reactance within a specified frequency range. Therefore, solutions to limit the rapid growth of the converter output current, which may cause over-current tripping during grid faults, are necessary. One effective solution is to use outer dual-loop voltage and current control so that current limitation can be realized by saturating the current reference. In the condition, electrical power (EP) of VSG can be calculated either with the converter output current or with the virtual current from the voltage loop, leading to different small-signal stability for the GFM converter. In this paper, small-signal stability of these two EP calculation methods are analysed and compared. Small-signal eigenvalues analysis shows that using virtual current from outer voltage loop for EP calculation contributes to better small-signal stability as compared to the conventional EP calculation approach, under both the weak grid and the strong grid conditions. Simulation results are provided to validate the effectiveness of the analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":386920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PEDG56097.2023.10215196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PEDG56097.2023.10215196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电网形成(GFM)变换器,如虚拟同步发电机(vsg),在特定频率范围内作为电抗后面的电压源。因此,有必要采取措施限制变流器输出电流的快速增长,以免在电网故障时造成过流跳闸。一种有效的解决方案是采用外双环电压和电流控制,通过饱和电流基准来实现电流限制。在这种情况下,VSG的电功率(EP)既可以用变换器的输出电流计算,也可以用电压环的虚电流计算,导致GFM变换器的小信号稳定性不同。本文对这两种EP计算方法的小信号稳定性进行了分析和比较。小信号特征值分析表明,在弱电网和强电网条件下,与传统的EP计算方法相比,采用外电压环虚电流进行EP计算具有更好的小信号稳定性。仿真结果验证了分析的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stability Comparison of Grid-Forming Converters with Different Power Calculation Strategies
Grid-forming (GFM) converters, such as virtual synchronous generators (VSGs), behave as voltage sources behind a reactance within a specified frequency range. Therefore, solutions to limit the rapid growth of the converter output current, which may cause over-current tripping during grid faults, are necessary. One effective solution is to use outer dual-loop voltage and current control so that current limitation can be realized by saturating the current reference. In the condition, electrical power (EP) of VSG can be calculated either with the converter output current or with the virtual current from the voltage loop, leading to different small-signal stability for the GFM converter. In this paper, small-signal stability of these two EP calculation methods are analysed and compared. Small-signal eigenvalues analysis shows that using virtual current from outer voltage loop for EP calculation contributes to better small-signal stability as compared to the conventional EP calculation approach, under both the weak grid and the strong grid conditions. Simulation results are provided to validate the effectiveness of the analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信