{"title":"《环球时报》中国美丽新世界及其他故事","authors":"Rana Mitter","doi":"10.1080/14690760903068034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rise of New Global Powers’ (pp. 278–92), which deal with contemporary affairs and reflect prophetically on a range of topics including globalisation (p. 280), Georgia/South Ossetia and Iraq (pp. 258, 285–7). Throughout the volume, Davies’s longstanding preoccupation with restoring East European perspectives to the study of history are given full and convincing voice – not least in his emphasis on Poland as a ‘missing link’ in many western (and particularly American) accounts, given that it was once Europe’s largest and arguably most progressive state until its eventual collapse in the late eighteenth century (pp. 147, 228). Davies revels in the self-appointed role as debunker, and in this mode his writing shines brightest: whether using statistics to skewer the lazy perception of widespread Nazi collaboration among Ukrainians, moderating views on Polish anti-Semitism or correcting the tendency to equate ‘Britain’ with ‘England’. Such broad-ranging volumes will always attract quibbles. Some will doubtless point to inconsistencies in tone and the light-handed touch with academic apparatus, such as footnotes. Yet by and large, the obvious pitfalls are avoided: repetition and error are kept within acceptable bounds, barring one or two strange typos (e.g. pp. 48, 67), and the essays are engaging in their directness, breadth and variety. There are a couple of off-topic oddities, such as an essay on the history of Magdalen College, Oxford (‘Sicut Lillium’), but bearing in mind the nature of the project and target audience, Davies has yet again struck publishing gold. As usual, he never fails to dig up colourful facts for the general reader – many of whom, for example, will be surprised to hear of Nietzsche’s Polish ancestry, a telling encapsulation of Europe’s interwoven past between East and West.","PeriodicalId":440652,"journal":{"name":"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"China’s Brave New World – and Other Tales for Global Times\",\"authors\":\"Rana Mitter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14690760903068034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rise of New Global Powers’ (pp. 278–92), which deal with contemporary affairs and reflect prophetically on a range of topics including globalisation (p. 280), Georgia/South Ossetia and Iraq (pp. 258, 285–7). Throughout the volume, Davies’s longstanding preoccupation with restoring East European perspectives to the study of history are given full and convincing voice – not least in his emphasis on Poland as a ‘missing link’ in many western (and particularly American) accounts, given that it was once Europe’s largest and arguably most progressive state until its eventual collapse in the late eighteenth century (pp. 147, 228). Davies revels in the self-appointed role as debunker, and in this mode his writing shines brightest: whether using statistics to skewer the lazy perception of widespread Nazi collaboration among Ukrainians, moderating views on Polish anti-Semitism or correcting the tendency to equate ‘Britain’ with ‘England’. Such broad-ranging volumes will always attract quibbles. Some will doubtless point to inconsistencies in tone and the light-handed touch with academic apparatus, such as footnotes. Yet by and large, the obvious pitfalls are avoided: repetition and error are kept within acceptable bounds, barring one or two strange typos (e.g. pp. 48, 67), and the essays are engaging in their directness, breadth and variety. There are a couple of off-topic oddities, such as an essay on the history of Magdalen College, Oxford (‘Sicut Lillium’), but bearing in mind the nature of the project and target audience, Davies has yet again struck publishing gold. As usual, he never fails to dig up colourful facts for the general reader – many of whom, for example, will be surprised to hear of Nietzsche’s Polish ancestry, a telling encapsulation of Europe’s interwoven past between East and West.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14690760903068034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14690760903068034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
《新全球大国的崛起》(第278-92页),该书涉及当代事务,并对全球化(第280页)、格鲁吉亚/南奥塞梯和伊拉克(第258页、285-7页)等一系列主题进行了预言性的反思。在整本书中,戴维斯对恢复东欧历史研究视角的长期关注得到了充分和令人信服的声音——尤其是他强调波兰是许多西方(尤其是美国)描述中的一个“缺失环节”,因为波兰曾经是欧洲最大的,可以说是最进步的国家,直到18世纪末最终崩溃(第147页,228页)。戴维斯喜欢自封为揭露者,在这种模式下,他的作品最闪耀:无论是用统计数据来戳穿乌克兰人普遍与纳粹合作的懒惰看法,缓和对波兰反犹太主义的看法,还是纠正将“英国”等同于“英格兰”的倾向。如此大范围的发行量总是会招致非议。毫无疑问,有些人会指出书中语气的不一致,以及对脚注等学术工具的草率处理。然而,总的来说,明显的陷阱被避免了:重复和错误被控制在可接受的范围内,除了一两个奇怪的拼写错误(例如第48页,第67页),并且文章的直接性,广度和多样性都很吸引人。书中也有一些偏离主题的古怪之处,比如一篇关于牛津大学莫德林学院历史的文章(' Sicut Lillium '),但考虑到这个项目的性质和目标读者,戴维斯又一次找到了出版的黄金。像往常一样,他总是为普通读者挖掘出丰富多彩的事实——例如,许多读者听到尼采的波兰血统会感到惊讶,这是对欧洲东西方交织的过去的生动概括。
China’s Brave New World – and Other Tales for Global Times
Rise of New Global Powers’ (pp. 278–92), which deal with contemporary affairs and reflect prophetically on a range of topics including globalisation (p. 280), Georgia/South Ossetia and Iraq (pp. 258, 285–7). Throughout the volume, Davies’s longstanding preoccupation with restoring East European perspectives to the study of history are given full and convincing voice – not least in his emphasis on Poland as a ‘missing link’ in many western (and particularly American) accounts, given that it was once Europe’s largest and arguably most progressive state until its eventual collapse in the late eighteenth century (pp. 147, 228). Davies revels in the self-appointed role as debunker, and in this mode his writing shines brightest: whether using statistics to skewer the lazy perception of widespread Nazi collaboration among Ukrainians, moderating views on Polish anti-Semitism or correcting the tendency to equate ‘Britain’ with ‘England’. Such broad-ranging volumes will always attract quibbles. Some will doubtless point to inconsistencies in tone and the light-handed touch with academic apparatus, such as footnotes. Yet by and large, the obvious pitfalls are avoided: repetition and error are kept within acceptable bounds, barring one or two strange typos (e.g. pp. 48, 67), and the essays are engaging in their directness, breadth and variety. There are a couple of off-topic oddities, such as an essay on the history of Magdalen College, Oxford (‘Sicut Lillium’), but bearing in mind the nature of the project and target audience, Davies has yet again struck publishing gold. As usual, he never fails to dig up colourful facts for the general reader – many of whom, for example, will be surprised to hear of Nietzsche’s Polish ancestry, a telling encapsulation of Europe’s interwoven past between East and West.