考虑约束

Erik O Eriksen, J. Fossum
{"title":"考虑约束","authors":"Erik O Eriksen, J. Fossum","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deliberation has figured centrally in the EU integration process, and in the workings of the consensus-oriented EU decision-making system. Can deliberation bear the burden of political legitimation or does deliberation itself require institutional support? In this chapter, we outline some of the cultural-institutional factors that variously foster and constrain deliberation in Europe. Further specification is provided through outlining the two main positions on the role and nature of deliberative democracy in the European Union context, namely the transnational and the institutional variant. An important question today concerns the prospects for deliberation after the Euro-crisis, a major institutional and constitutional crisis for the EU. The Euro-crisis (and the other associated challenges) is transforming the EU into a segmented political order which reduces the democratic merits of deliberation. Deliberation within segmented contexts is biased towards professionalized expertise and the trained incapacity of epistemic communities.","PeriodicalId":185217,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deliberation Constrained\",\"authors\":\"Erik O Eriksen, J. Fossum\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deliberation has figured centrally in the EU integration process, and in the workings of the consensus-oriented EU decision-making system. Can deliberation bear the burden of political legitimation or does deliberation itself require institutional support? In this chapter, we outline some of the cultural-institutional factors that variously foster and constrain deliberation in Europe. Further specification is provided through outlining the two main positions on the role and nature of deliberative democracy in the European Union context, namely the transnational and the institutional variant. An important question today concerns the prospects for deliberation after the Euro-crisis, a major institutional and constitutional crisis for the EU. The Euro-crisis (and the other associated challenges) is transforming the EU into a segmented political order which reduces the democratic merits of deliberation. Deliberation within segmented contexts is biased towards professionalized expertise and the trained incapacity of epistemic communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

审议在欧盟一体化进程和以共识为导向的欧盟决策体系的运作中发挥了核心作用。审议是否能够承担政治合法化的负担,或者审议本身是否需要制度的支持?在本章中,我们概述了在欧洲促进和限制审议的一些文化制度因素。通过概述关于欧洲联盟范围内协商民主的作用和性质的两种主要立场,即跨国和机构形式,提供了进一步的具体说明。今天的一个重要问题涉及欧元危机之后的审议前景,欧元危机是欧盟的一场重大制度和宪法危机。欧元危机(以及其他相关挑战)正在将欧盟转变为一个分裂的政治秩序,削弱了审议的民主价值。在分段背景下的审议倾向于专业化的专业知识和训练有素的知识社区的无能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deliberation Constrained
Deliberation has figured centrally in the EU integration process, and in the workings of the consensus-oriented EU decision-making system. Can deliberation bear the burden of political legitimation or does deliberation itself require institutional support? In this chapter, we outline some of the cultural-institutional factors that variously foster and constrain deliberation in Europe. Further specification is provided through outlining the two main positions on the role and nature of deliberative democracy in the European Union context, namely the transnational and the institutional variant. An important question today concerns the prospects for deliberation after the Euro-crisis, a major institutional and constitutional crisis for the EU. The Euro-crisis (and the other associated challenges) is transforming the EU into a segmented political order which reduces the democratic merits of deliberation. Deliberation within segmented contexts is biased towards professionalized expertise and the trained incapacity of epistemic communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信