基于TiO2和TaO2的双极电阻开关器件的比较

Patrick W. C. Ho, F. Hatem, H. Almurib, T. N. Kumar
{"title":"基于TiO2和TaO2的双极电阻开关器件的比较","authors":"Patrick W. C. Ho, F. Hatem, H. Almurib, T. N. Kumar","doi":"10.1109/ICED.2014.7015808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nonvolatile memories have emerged in recent years and have become a leading candidate towards replacing dynamic and static random-access memory devices. In this article, the performance of physical TiO<sub>2</sub> and TaO<sub>2</sub> nonvolatile memristive devices were compared in terms of switching speed, retention and endurance. TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices have shown better endurance (10<sup>8</sup> times more switching cycles) and faster switching speed (at least 5 times) than TiO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices. The retention period of TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices is expected to exceed 10 years with sufficient experimental evidence. In addition to comparing device performances, the physical and material properties of TiO<sub>2</sub> and TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices was studied and the differences in device structure and switching mechanism of TiO<sub>2</sub> and TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices were explained. The reasons that give TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices the advantage over TiO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices in terms of switching speed, retention and endurance were summarized in this article. Also the methods to improve the performance of physical memristive devices were proposed.","PeriodicalId":143806,"journal":{"name":"2014 2nd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison on TiO2 and TaO2 based bipolar resistive switching devices\",\"authors\":\"Patrick W. C. Ho, F. Hatem, H. Almurib, T. N. Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICED.2014.7015808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nonvolatile memories have emerged in recent years and have become a leading candidate towards replacing dynamic and static random-access memory devices. In this article, the performance of physical TiO<sub>2</sub> and TaO<sub>2</sub> nonvolatile memristive devices were compared in terms of switching speed, retention and endurance. TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices have shown better endurance (10<sup>8</sup> times more switching cycles) and faster switching speed (at least 5 times) than TiO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices. The retention period of TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices is expected to exceed 10 years with sufficient experimental evidence. In addition to comparing device performances, the physical and material properties of TiO<sub>2</sub> and TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices was studied and the differences in device structure and switching mechanism of TiO<sub>2</sub> and TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices were explained. The reasons that give TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices the advantage over TiO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices in terms of switching speed, retention and endurance were summarized in this article. Also the methods to improve the performance of physical memristive devices were proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 2nd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 2nd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICED.2014.7015808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 2nd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICED.2014.7015808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

非易失性存储器是近年来出现的,已成为取代动态和静态随机存取存储器的主要候选器件。在本文中,比较了物理TiO2和TaO2非易失性记忆器件在开关速度、保持率和耐用性方面的性能。与TiO2忆阻器件相比,TaO2忆阻器件表现出更好的耐久性(开关周期增加108倍)和更快的开关速度(至少5倍)。在实验证据充分的情况下,TaO2记忆器件的保留期有望超过10年。除了比较器件性能外,还研究了TiO2和TaO2忆阻器件的物理和材料性质,并解释了TiO2和TaO2忆阻器件在器件结构和开关机理上的差异。本文总结了使TaO2忆阻器件在开关速度、保持力和持久性方面优于TiO2忆阻器件的原因。提出了提高物理记忆器件性能的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison on TiO2 and TaO2 based bipolar resistive switching devices
Nonvolatile memories have emerged in recent years and have become a leading candidate towards replacing dynamic and static random-access memory devices. In this article, the performance of physical TiO2 and TaO2 nonvolatile memristive devices were compared in terms of switching speed, retention and endurance. TaO2 memristive devices have shown better endurance (108 times more switching cycles) and faster switching speed (at least 5 times) than TiO2 memristive devices. The retention period of TaO2 memristive devices is expected to exceed 10 years with sufficient experimental evidence. In addition to comparing device performances, the physical and material properties of TiO2 and TaO2 memristive devices was studied and the differences in device structure and switching mechanism of TiO2 and TaO2 memristive devices were explained. The reasons that give TaO2 memristive devices the advantage over TiO2 memristive devices in terms of switching speed, retention and endurance were summarized in this article. Also the methods to improve the performance of physical memristive devices were proposed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信