Patrick W. C. Ho, F. Hatem, H. Almurib, T. N. Kumar
{"title":"基于TiO2和TaO2的双极电阻开关器件的比较","authors":"Patrick W. C. Ho, F. Hatem, H. Almurib, T. N. Kumar","doi":"10.1109/ICED.2014.7015808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nonvolatile memories have emerged in recent years and have become a leading candidate towards replacing dynamic and static random-access memory devices. In this article, the performance of physical TiO<sub>2</sub> and TaO<sub>2</sub> nonvolatile memristive devices were compared in terms of switching speed, retention and endurance. TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices have shown better endurance (10<sup>8</sup> times more switching cycles) and faster switching speed (at least 5 times) than TiO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices. The retention period of TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices is expected to exceed 10 years with sufficient experimental evidence. In addition to comparing device performances, the physical and material properties of TiO<sub>2</sub> and TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices was studied and the differences in device structure and switching mechanism of TiO<sub>2</sub> and TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices were explained. The reasons that give TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices the advantage over TiO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices in terms of switching speed, retention and endurance were summarized in this article. Also the methods to improve the performance of physical memristive devices were proposed.","PeriodicalId":143806,"journal":{"name":"2014 2nd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison on TiO2 and TaO2 based bipolar resistive switching devices\",\"authors\":\"Patrick W. C. Ho, F. Hatem, H. Almurib, T. N. Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICED.2014.7015808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nonvolatile memories have emerged in recent years and have become a leading candidate towards replacing dynamic and static random-access memory devices. In this article, the performance of physical TiO<sub>2</sub> and TaO<sub>2</sub> nonvolatile memristive devices were compared in terms of switching speed, retention and endurance. TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices have shown better endurance (10<sup>8</sup> times more switching cycles) and faster switching speed (at least 5 times) than TiO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices. The retention period of TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices is expected to exceed 10 years with sufficient experimental evidence. In addition to comparing device performances, the physical and material properties of TiO<sub>2</sub> and TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices was studied and the differences in device structure and switching mechanism of TiO<sub>2</sub> and TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices were explained. The reasons that give TaO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices the advantage over TiO<sub>2</sub> memristive devices in terms of switching speed, retention and endurance were summarized in this article. Also the methods to improve the performance of physical memristive devices were proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 2nd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 2nd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICED.2014.7015808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 2nd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICED.2014.7015808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison on TiO2 and TaO2 based bipolar resistive switching devices
Nonvolatile memories have emerged in recent years and have become a leading candidate towards replacing dynamic and static random-access memory devices. In this article, the performance of physical TiO2 and TaO2 nonvolatile memristive devices were compared in terms of switching speed, retention and endurance. TaO2 memristive devices have shown better endurance (108 times more switching cycles) and faster switching speed (at least 5 times) than TiO2 memristive devices. The retention period of TaO2 memristive devices is expected to exceed 10 years with sufficient experimental evidence. In addition to comparing device performances, the physical and material properties of TiO2 and TaO2 memristive devices was studied and the differences in device structure and switching mechanism of TiO2 and TaO2 memristive devices were explained. The reasons that give TaO2 memristive devices the advantage over TiO2 memristive devices in terms of switching speed, retention and endurance were summarized in this article. Also the methods to improve the performance of physical memristive devices were proposed.