C. Nafornita, A. Isar, Teodor Dehelean, I. Nafornita
{"title":"汽车雷达两种压缩感知算法的比较","authors":"C. Nafornita, A. Isar, Teodor Dehelean, I. Nafornita","doi":"10.1109/ISETC50328.2020.9301105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze the possibility of using compressive sensing algorithms for the rapid chirps waveform in automotive radar sensor applications. Two algorithms are considered: Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) and l1-magic. We compare the two methods in a scenario using nine targets, with and without noise. The number of non-uniformly placed samples is four times less than the number of uniform samples, with target detection possible even in the presence of noise. It is shown that OMP outperforms l1-magic, with spectra not affected by the Compressive Sensing reconstruction. The results are comparable with the traditional uniform sampling results.","PeriodicalId":165650,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Two Compressive Sensing Algorithms for Automotive Radar\",\"authors\":\"C. Nafornita, A. Isar, Teodor Dehelean, I. Nafornita\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISETC50328.2020.9301105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We analyze the possibility of using compressive sensing algorithms for the rapid chirps waveform in automotive radar sensor applications. Two algorithms are considered: Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) and l1-magic. We compare the two methods in a scenario using nine targets, with and without noise. The number of non-uniformly placed samples is four times less than the number of uniform samples, with target detection possible even in the presence of noise. It is shown that OMP outperforms l1-magic, with spectra not affected by the Compressive Sensing reconstruction. The results are comparable with the traditional uniform sampling results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISETC50328.2020.9301105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISETC50328.2020.9301105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Two Compressive Sensing Algorithms for Automotive Radar
We analyze the possibility of using compressive sensing algorithms for the rapid chirps waveform in automotive radar sensor applications. Two algorithms are considered: Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) and l1-magic. We compare the two methods in a scenario using nine targets, with and without noise. The number of non-uniformly placed samples is four times less than the number of uniform samples, with target detection possible even in the presence of noise. It is shown that OMP outperforms l1-magic, with spectra not affected by the Compressive Sensing reconstruction. The results are comparable with the traditional uniform sampling results.