全职员工与兼职员工个人与组织契合度对工作态度影响的比较:基于响应面方法的多项式回归分析的假设生成案例研究

Norihiko Ogawa, Daisuke Osato, Kiyoshi Takahashi
{"title":"全职员工与兼职员工个人与组织契合度对工作态度影响的比较:基于响应面方法的多项式回归分析的假设生成案例研究","authors":"Norihiko Ogawa, Daisuke Osato, Kiyoshi Takahashi","doi":"10.33422/icrhrm.2019.03.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the present study is to compare the effects of Person–Organization fit on the organizational commitment of full-timers and part-timers using polynomial regression with surface response analysis, and to suggest an exploratory hypothesis based on this case study. A questionnaire survey was administered at a food retail/manufacturing company in Japan. After comparing the effects of P–O fit on 129 full-timers and 567 part-timers in relation to their organizational commitment, we found that: (1) In the human-oriented vs. task-oriented dimension of organizational culture, whereas full-timers held certain levels of commitment when they fit their value and organizational culture (whether at high levels (human-oriented) or low levels (taskoriented) of congruence), part-timers increased their commitment only at low levels of congruence and tended to decrease commitment at high levels of fitness; (2) Although incongruence between individual value and organizational culture in two dimensions (human vs. task-oriented and autonomous vs. heteronomous) had a negative effect on commitment for both employment statuses, the directions of unfitness were different. While full-timers decreased their commitment more seriously when the value of organizational culture exceeded that of individual value, the opposite happened with part-timers, who showed more a serious decrease when the value of individual value exceeded that of organizational culture. Based on the results and partial inclusion theory, we suggest a new hypothesis that P–O fit may have a relatively more serious effect on part-","PeriodicalId":441958,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The International Conference on Research in Human Resource Management","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between Full-timers and Part-timers of the Effect of Person–Organization Fit on Working Attitude: A Hypothesis-Generating Case Study Using Polynomial Regression Analysis with Response Surface Methodology\",\"authors\":\"Norihiko Ogawa, Daisuke Osato, Kiyoshi Takahashi\",\"doi\":\"10.33422/icrhrm.2019.03.106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the present study is to compare the effects of Person–Organization fit on the organizational commitment of full-timers and part-timers using polynomial regression with surface response analysis, and to suggest an exploratory hypothesis based on this case study. A questionnaire survey was administered at a food retail/manufacturing company in Japan. After comparing the effects of P–O fit on 129 full-timers and 567 part-timers in relation to their organizational commitment, we found that: (1) In the human-oriented vs. task-oriented dimension of organizational culture, whereas full-timers held certain levels of commitment when they fit their value and organizational culture (whether at high levels (human-oriented) or low levels (taskoriented) of congruence), part-timers increased their commitment only at low levels of congruence and tended to decrease commitment at high levels of fitness; (2) Although incongruence between individual value and organizational culture in two dimensions (human vs. task-oriented and autonomous vs. heteronomous) had a negative effect on commitment for both employment statuses, the directions of unfitness were different. While full-timers decreased their commitment more seriously when the value of organizational culture exceeded that of individual value, the opposite happened with part-timers, who showed more a serious decrease when the value of individual value exceeded that of organizational culture. Based on the results and partial inclusion theory, we suggest a new hypothesis that P–O fit may have a relatively more serious effect on part-\",\"PeriodicalId\":441958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of The International Conference on Research in Human Resource Management\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of The International Conference on Research in Human Resource Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33422/icrhrm.2019.03.106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The International Conference on Research in Human Resource Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/icrhrm.2019.03.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是利用表面响应分析的多项式回归,比较个人-组织契合度对全职和兼职员工组织承诺的影响,并在此基础上提出探索性假设。对日本一家食品零售/制造公司进行了问卷调查。通过比较P-O契合度对129名全职员工和567名兼职员工组织承诺的影响,我们发现:(1)在以人为本与任务为本的组织文化维度上,全职员工在价值观与组织文化的契合度较高(以人为本)或较低(任务为本)时均能保持一定程度的承诺,而兼职员工只有在契合度较低时才会增加承诺,而在契合度较高时则倾向于降低承诺;(2)尽管个体价值与组织文化在“人”与“任务”、“自主”与“他律”两个维度上的不一致对两种就业状态的承诺都有负面影响,但不适应的方向不同。当组织文化价值超过个人价值时,全职员工的承诺下降更为严重,而兼职员工的承诺下降则相反,当个人价值超过组织文化价值时,兼职员工的承诺下降更为严重。根据实验结果和部分包含理论,我们提出了一个新的假设,即P-O拟合对部分-的影响可能相对更严重
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between Full-timers and Part-timers of the Effect of Person–Organization Fit on Working Attitude: A Hypothesis-Generating Case Study Using Polynomial Regression Analysis with Response Surface Methodology
The purpose of the present study is to compare the effects of Person–Organization fit on the organizational commitment of full-timers and part-timers using polynomial regression with surface response analysis, and to suggest an exploratory hypothesis based on this case study. A questionnaire survey was administered at a food retail/manufacturing company in Japan. After comparing the effects of P–O fit on 129 full-timers and 567 part-timers in relation to their organizational commitment, we found that: (1) In the human-oriented vs. task-oriented dimension of organizational culture, whereas full-timers held certain levels of commitment when they fit their value and organizational culture (whether at high levels (human-oriented) or low levels (taskoriented) of congruence), part-timers increased their commitment only at low levels of congruence and tended to decrease commitment at high levels of fitness; (2) Although incongruence between individual value and organizational culture in two dimensions (human vs. task-oriented and autonomous vs. heteronomous) had a negative effect on commitment for both employment statuses, the directions of unfitness were different. While full-timers decreased their commitment more seriously when the value of organizational culture exceeded that of individual value, the opposite happened with part-timers, who showed more a serious decrease when the value of individual value exceeded that of organizational culture. Based on the results and partial inclusion theory, we suggest a new hypothesis that P–O fit may have a relatively more serious effect on part-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信