暂态与永久联合故障处理的可靠性估计

S. Scharoba, Mario Scholzel, T. Koal, H. Vierhaus
{"title":"暂态与永久联合故障处理的可靠性估计","authors":"S. Scharoba, Mario Scholzel, T. Koal, H. Vierhaus","doi":"10.1109/BEC.2014.7320559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the problem of modeling the reliability of systems, where permanent and transient faults are handled in a combined manner. First, we briefly introduce the motivation for handling permanent and transient faults within a combined architecture. Then, based on the well known TMR scheme, we present the difference in modeling the reliability for permanent and transient faults. Subsequently, we introduce two distinct methods for modeling both fault types together and explain how the calculation of the reliability can be done. Both models vary in their accuracy and complexity. Furthermore, we apply the proposed modeling strategies to a more complex system, where permanent fault compensation is used to keep transient fault detection/masking unaffected. Modeling this system with both methods is discussed for varying system parameters and failure rates. The results show that in particular situations the use of the simple model is sufficient and makes system modeling less time consuming. But in some cases the inaccuracy of the simplified model will cause an excessively optimistic estimation of the reliability.","PeriodicalId":348260,"journal":{"name":"2014 14th Biennial Baltic Electronic Conference (BEC)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On reliability estimation for combined transient and permanent fault handling\",\"authors\":\"S. Scharoba, Mario Scholzel, T. Koal, H. Vierhaus\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BEC.2014.7320559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper addresses the problem of modeling the reliability of systems, where permanent and transient faults are handled in a combined manner. First, we briefly introduce the motivation for handling permanent and transient faults within a combined architecture. Then, based on the well known TMR scheme, we present the difference in modeling the reliability for permanent and transient faults. Subsequently, we introduce two distinct methods for modeling both fault types together and explain how the calculation of the reliability can be done. Both models vary in their accuracy and complexity. Furthermore, we apply the proposed modeling strategies to a more complex system, where permanent fault compensation is used to keep transient fault detection/masking unaffected. Modeling this system with both methods is discussed for varying system parameters and failure rates. The results show that in particular situations the use of the simple model is sufficient and makes system modeling less time consuming. But in some cases the inaccuracy of the simplified model will cause an excessively optimistic estimation of the reliability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 14th Biennial Baltic Electronic Conference (BEC)\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 14th Biennial Baltic Electronic Conference (BEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BEC.2014.7320559\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 14th Biennial Baltic Electronic Conference (BEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BEC.2014.7320559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文解决了系统可靠性建模问题,其中永久故障和暂态故障以组合方式处理。首先,我们简要介绍在组合体系结构中处理永久和暂态故障的动机。然后,在已知的TMR方案的基础上,提出了永久故障和暂态故障可靠性建模的区别。随后,我们介绍了两种不同的方法来对两种故障类型进行建模,并解释了如何进行可靠性计算。两种模型的准确性和复杂性各不相同。此外,我们将提出的建模策略应用于更复杂的系统,其中使用永久故障补偿来保持暂态故障检测/屏蔽不受影响。讨论了两种方法在系统参数和故障率变化情况下的建模问题。结果表明,在特定情况下,使用简单的模型是足够的,并且可以减少系统建模的耗时。但在某些情况下,简化模型的不准确性会导致对可靠性的过度乐观估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On reliability estimation for combined transient and permanent fault handling
This paper addresses the problem of modeling the reliability of systems, where permanent and transient faults are handled in a combined manner. First, we briefly introduce the motivation for handling permanent and transient faults within a combined architecture. Then, based on the well known TMR scheme, we present the difference in modeling the reliability for permanent and transient faults. Subsequently, we introduce two distinct methods for modeling both fault types together and explain how the calculation of the reliability can be done. Both models vary in their accuracy and complexity. Furthermore, we apply the proposed modeling strategies to a more complex system, where permanent fault compensation is used to keep transient fault detection/masking unaffected. Modeling this system with both methods is discussed for varying system parameters and failure rates. The results show that in particular situations the use of the simple model is sufficient and makes system modeling less time consuming. But in some cases the inaccuracy of the simplified model will cause an excessively optimistic estimation of the reliability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信