Ashfaq Akram, Kamran Sattar, Tauseef Ahmad, H. Abdulghani, Jennesse John, M. Yusoff
{"title":"在COVID-19期间翻转“学习技能”课程:一项混合模式研究","authors":"Ashfaq Akram, Kamran Sattar, Tauseef Ahmad, H. Abdulghani, Jennesse John, M. Yusoff","doi":"10.21315/eimj2021.13.3.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to compare the male and female medical students’ perceptions of the flipped classroom (FC) using the Zoom online platform during the COVID-19 pandemic. A mixedmodality study proceeded for first-year undergraduate medical students (n = 149). Three topics (learning how to learn, stress management and doctor-patient communication) were flipped using the Zoom platform. Following the flipping, relevant videos and PowerPoint slides were sent to the students. Home assignments were done through the online classroom. The students were then made to answer a questionnaire on their perceptions of FC consisting of 5-point Likert items. In addition, a focus group discussion (FGD) was carried out with voluntary participation (n = 13) for an in-depth discussion of flipped teaching. The quantitative data were analysed using the independent t-test, and Atlas.ti was used to analyse the qualitative data. For most of the Likert statements, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the mean results obtained by the male and female students. For example, for the item “The learning material was available before class time”, both the male (mean [SD] = 1.857 [0.443]) and female (mean [SD] = 1.966 [0.365]) respondents confirmed the learning material’s availability before class time (p = 0.121). However, the mean result obtained by the male respondents for the variable “I understood the topics in lesser time compared to the traditional lecture method” was higher than the mean result obtained by the female participants by 0.236, which was statistically significant (95% CI [0.373, –0.100], p = 0.001). Modified FC teaching for the “learning skills” course is thus an effective teaching method. The male students took significantly lesser time understanding the three included topics compared to the female students.","PeriodicalId":130340,"journal":{"name":"Education in Medicine Journal","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flipping the “Learning Skills” Course during COVID-19: A Mixed-Modality Study\",\"authors\":\"Ashfaq Akram, Kamran Sattar, Tauseef Ahmad, H. Abdulghani, Jennesse John, M. Yusoff\",\"doi\":\"10.21315/eimj2021.13.3.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to compare the male and female medical students’ perceptions of the flipped classroom (FC) using the Zoom online platform during the COVID-19 pandemic. A mixedmodality study proceeded for first-year undergraduate medical students (n = 149). Three topics (learning how to learn, stress management and doctor-patient communication) were flipped using the Zoom platform. Following the flipping, relevant videos and PowerPoint slides were sent to the students. Home assignments were done through the online classroom. The students were then made to answer a questionnaire on their perceptions of FC consisting of 5-point Likert items. In addition, a focus group discussion (FGD) was carried out with voluntary participation (n = 13) for an in-depth discussion of flipped teaching. The quantitative data were analysed using the independent t-test, and Atlas.ti was used to analyse the qualitative data. For most of the Likert statements, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the mean results obtained by the male and female students. For example, for the item “The learning material was available before class time”, both the male (mean [SD] = 1.857 [0.443]) and female (mean [SD] = 1.966 [0.365]) respondents confirmed the learning material’s availability before class time (p = 0.121). However, the mean result obtained by the male respondents for the variable “I understood the topics in lesser time compared to the traditional lecture method” was higher than the mean result obtained by the female participants by 0.236, which was statistically significant (95% CI [0.373, –0.100], p = 0.001). Modified FC teaching for the “learning skills” course is thus an effective teaching method. The male students took significantly lesser time understanding the three included topics compared to the female students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education in Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education in Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2021.13.3.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education in Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2021.13.3.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
本研究的目的是比较在COVID-19大流行期间,男性和女性医学生对使用Zoom在线平台的翻转课堂(FC)的看法。对一年级医科本科生进行了一项混合模式研究(n = 149)。使用Zoom平台翻转了三个主题(学习如何学习、压力管理和医患沟通)。在翻转之后,相关的视频和PowerPoint幻灯片被发给了学生。家庭作业是通过在线课堂完成的。然后让学生们回答一份由5点李克特题组成的关于他们对FC的看法的问卷。此外,我们还开展了一个自愿参与的焦点小组讨论(FGD),对翻转教学进行了深入讨论。定量资料采用独立t检验和Atlas进行分析。采用Ti对定性数据进行分析。在大多数Likert语句中,男女学生的平均结果无显著差异(p > 0.05)。例如,对于“学习材料在上课前可用”这一项,男性(平均[SD] = 1.857[0.443])和女性(平均[SD] = 1.966[0.365])的被调查者都确认学习材料在上课前可用(p = 0.121)。而在变量“I understand the topics in less time compared to traditional lecture method”中,男性受试者的平均结果比女性受试者的平均结果高0.236,差异有统计学意义(95% CI [0.373, -0.100], p = 0.001)。“学习技能”课程的改进FC教学是一种有效的教学方法。与女生相比,男生在理解这三个主题上花费的时间要少得多。
Flipping the “Learning Skills” Course during COVID-19: A Mixed-Modality Study
The purpose of this study was to compare the male and female medical students’ perceptions of the flipped classroom (FC) using the Zoom online platform during the COVID-19 pandemic. A mixedmodality study proceeded for first-year undergraduate medical students (n = 149). Three topics (learning how to learn, stress management and doctor-patient communication) were flipped using the Zoom platform. Following the flipping, relevant videos and PowerPoint slides were sent to the students. Home assignments were done through the online classroom. The students were then made to answer a questionnaire on their perceptions of FC consisting of 5-point Likert items. In addition, a focus group discussion (FGD) was carried out with voluntary participation (n = 13) for an in-depth discussion of flipped teaching. The quantitative data were analysed using the independent t-test, and Atlas.ti was used to analyse the qualitative data. For most of the Likert statements, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the mean results obtained by the male and female students. For example, for the item “The learning material was available before class time”, both the male (mean [SD] = 1.857 [0.443]) and female (mean [SD] = 1.966 [0.365]) respondents confirmed the learning material’s availability before class time (p = 0.121). However, the mean result obtained by the male respondents for the variable “I understood the topics in lesser time compared to the traditional lecture method” was higher than the mean result obtained by the female participants by 0.236, which was statistically significant (95% CI [0.373, –0.100], p = 0.001). Modified FC teaching for the “learning skills” course is thus an effective teaching method. The male students took significantly lesser time understanding the three included topics compared to the female students.