{"title":"线性最小二乘计算机程序的评价","authors":"Roy H. Wampler","doi":"10.6028/JRES.073B.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two linear least squ a res tes t p roblems, both fifth degree polyno mi a ls, have bee n run on more th an twe nJ y d iffe rent co mput e r progra ms in orde r to assess th e ir num erica l acc uracy. Among the progra ms tes ted were re presentati ves f ro m vari ous sta ti sti ca l pac kages as we ll as some from th e S HA RE libra ry. Essenti a ll y fi ve diffe re nt algorithm s were used in the va ri ous progra ms to obta in the coeffi c ients of the leas t squ a res fit s. The tests were run on severa l diffe rent comput e rs, in doubl e prec i io n as we ll as s ingle precis ion. By co mpa ring the coe ffi c ie nts re port ed , it was found th at those programs us in g orthogona l Householde r transform ations or Gra m-Schmidt orthonorm aliza tion we re much more accura te th an those us ing e liminatio n a lgo rithms. P rogra ms us ing orthogo na l polyno mi als (s uit a bl e onl y for po lynomi a l fit s) a lso pro ved to be superior to those us ing e limin ation a lgo rithm s_ O ne program , us ing congru enti a l me thods and int eger a rithme ti c, obt a ined exac t so lutions. In a number of progra ms , the coeffi cie nts re port ed in one tes t probl e m were sometim es co mple te ly e rroneous, cont aining not even one co rrec t s ignificant digit.","PeriodicalId":166823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section B: Mathematical Sciences","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1969-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of linear least squares computer programs\",\"authors\":\"Roy H. Wampler\",\"doi\":\"10.6028/JRES.073B.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two linear least squ a res tes t p roblems, both fifth degree polyno mi a ls, have bee n run on more th an twe nJ y d iffe rent co mput e r progra ms in orde r to assess th e ir num erica l acc uracy. Among the progra ms tes ted were re presentati ves f ro m vari ous sta ti sti ca l pac kages as we ll as some from th e S HA RE libra ry. Essenti a ll y fi ve diffe re nt algorithm s were used in the va ri ous progra ms to obta in the coeffi c ients of the leas t squ a res fit s. The tests were run on severa l diffe rent comput e rs, in doubl e prec i io n as we ll as s ingle precis ion. By co mpa ring the coe ffi c ie nts re port ed , it was found th at those programs us in g orthogona l Householde r transform ations or Gra m-Schmidt orthonorm aliza tion we re much more accura te th an those us ing e liminatio n a lgo rithms. P rogra ms us ing orthogo na l polyno mi als (s uit a bl e onl y for po lynomi a l fit s) a lso pro ved to be superior to those us ing e limin ation a lgo rithm s_ O ne program , us ing congru enti a l me thods and int eger a rithme ti c, obt a ined exac t so lutions. In a number of progra ms , the coeffi cie nts re port ed in one tes t probl e m were sometim es co mple te ly e rroneous, cont aining not even one co rrec t s ignificant digit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section B: Mathematical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1969-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section B: Mathematical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6028/JRES.073B.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section B: Mathematical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6028/JRES.073B.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36
摘要
两种线性最小二乘求解方法(均为五次多项式和五次多项式)已在超过两种不同的输入程序上运行,以评估该方法的精度。progra te ted女士中有再保险presentati大f ro m诸多sta ti sti ca l pac凯奇一样我们会从th e S HA再保险天秤座。雨淑缇你y fi已经产生再保险nt算法年代用于va ri诸多progra女士得出coeffi c病患的草原t短时res合适。几产生租金上测试运行在第一版e rs,在房子的e prec我io n S炉火一样我们会大致离子。通过对比所报道的相关数据,我们发现,使用正交变换或Gra - m-Schmidt正交化的程序比使用正交变换或Gra - m-Schmidt正交化的程序更准确。P程序使用正交多函数函数(仅适用于多项式和整数多函数),也被证明优于使用极限和整数多函数函数的程序。在P程序中,使用整数多函数函数和整数多函数函数的整数多函数函数,得到了线性精确的解。在一些程序中,在一个问题中报告的系数有时是完全错误的,甚至不包含一个有效数字。
An evaluation of linear least squares computer programs
Two linear least squ a res tes t p roblems, both fifth degree polyno mi a ls, have bee n run on more th an twe nJ y d iffe rent co mput e r progra ms in orde r to assess th e ir num erica l acc uracy. Among the progra ms tes ted were re presentati ves f ro m vari ous sta ti sti ca l pac kages as we ll as some from th e S HA RE libra ry. Essenti a ll y fi ve diffe re nt algorithm s were used in the va ri ous progra ms to obta in the coeffi c ients of the leas t squ a res fit s. The tests were run on severa l diffe rent comput e rs, in doubl e prec i io n as we ll as s ingle precis ion. By co mpa ring the coe ffi c ie nts re port ed , it was found th at those programs us in g orthogona l Householde r transform ations or Gra m-Schmidt orthonorm aliza tion we re much more accura te th an those us ing e liminatio n a lgo rithms. P rogra ms us ing orthogo na l polyno mi als (s uit a bl e onl y for po lynomi a l fit s) a lso pro ved to be superior to those us ing e limin ation a lgo rithm s_ O ne program , us ing congru enti a l me thods and int eger a rithme ti c, obt a ined exac t so lutions. In a number of progra ms , the coeffi cie nts re port ed in one tes t probl e m were sometim es co mple te ly e rroneous, cont aining not even one co rrec t s ignificant digit.