针对主动对手的安全多方计算协议的隐私性自动证明

Martin Pettai, Peeter Laud
{"title":"针对主动对手的安全多方计算协议的隐私性自动证明","authors":"Martin Pettai, Peeter Laud","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2015.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We describe an automatic analysis to check secure multi-party computation protocols against privacy leaks. The analysis is sound -- a protocol that is deemed private does not leak anything about its private inputs, even if active attacks are performed against it. Privacy against active adversaries is an essential ingredient in constructions aiming to provide security (privacy + correctness) in adversarial models of intermediate (between passive and active) strength. Using our analysis we are able to show that the protocols used by the SHAREMIND secure multi-party computation platform are actively private.","PeriodicalId":210917,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 28th Computer Security Foundations Symposium","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic Proofs of Privacy of Secure Multi-party Computation Protocols against Active Adversaries\",\"authors\":\"Martin Pettai, Peeter Laud\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSF.2015.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We describe an automatic analysis to check secure multi-party computation protocols against privacy leaks. The analysis is sound -- a protocol that is deemed private does not leak anything about its private inputs, even if active attacks are performed against it. Privacy against active adversaries is an essential ingredient in constructions aiming to provide security (privacy + correctness) in adversarial models of intermediate (between passive and active) strength. Using our analysis we are able to show that the protocols used by the SHAREMIND secure multi-party computation platform are actively private.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE 28th Computer Security Foundations Symposium\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE 28th Computer Security Foundations Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2015.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 28th Computer Security Foundations Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2015.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

我们描述了一个自动分析来检查安全的多方计算协议,防止隐私泄露。分析是合理的——一个被认为是私有的协议不会泄露任何关于其私有输入的信息,即使对它进行了主动攻击。针对主动对手的隐私是旨在在中间(被动和主动之间)强度的对抗模型中提供安全性(隐私+正确性)的结构的重要组成部分。通过我们的分析,我们能够证明SHAREMIND安全多方计算平台使用的协议是主动私有的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automatic Proofs of Privacy of Secure Multi-party Computation Protocols against Active Adversaries
We describe an automatic analysis to check secure multi-party computation protocols against privacy leaks. The analysis is sound -- a protocol that is deemed private does not leak anything about its private inputs, even if active attacks are performed against it. Privacy against active adversaries is an essential ingredient in constructions aiming to provide security (privacy + correctness) in adversarial models of intermediate (between passive and active) strength. Using our analysis we are able to show that the protocols used by the SHAREMIND secure multi-party computation platform are actively private.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信