主题演讲:概念建模与本体

S. Spaccapietra
{"title":"主题演讲:概念建模与本体","authors":"S. Spaccapietra","doi":"10.1109/CIST.2012.6388052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers as well as application developers tend to follow the latest trend that consists in building their information system around a newly developed ontology specific to their application domain. While sometimes this approach is perfectly justified, some other times it appears to be just a fashion effect. The goal of this talk is to clarify the situation, showing in which situation a database approach is preferable to an ontological approach and vice versa, based on the specific features of either approaches.","PeriodicalId":120664,"journal":{"name":"2012 Colloquium in Information Science and Technology","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keynote talk: Conceptual modeling versus ontologies\",\"authors\":\"S. Spaccapietra\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIST.2012.6388052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Researchers as well as application developers tend to follow the latest trend that consists in building their information system around a newly developed ontology specific to their application domain. While sometimes this approach is perfectly justified, some other times it appears to be just a fashion effect. The goal of this talk is to clarify the situation, showing in which situation a database approach is preferable to an ontological approach and vice versa, based on the specific features of either approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Colloquium in Information Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Colloquium in Information Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIST.2012.6388052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Colloquium in Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIST.2012.6388052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员和应用程序开发人员倾向于遵循最新的趋势,即围绕特定于其应用领域的新开发的本体构建他们的信息系统。虽然有时这种做法是完全合理的,但有时它似乎只是一种时尚效应。本次演讲的目的是澄清情况,根据两种方法的具体特点,说明在哪种情况下数据库方法优于本体方法,反之亦然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Keynote talk: Conceptual modeling versus ontologies
Researchers as well as application developers tend to follow the latest trend that consists in building their information system around a newly developed ontology specific to their application domain. While sometimes this approach is perfectly justified, some other times it appears to be just a fashion effect. The goal of this talk is to clarify the situation, showing in which situation a database approach is preferable to an ontological approach and vice versa, based on the specific features of either approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信