基于成果教育的可考试课程评估工具

M. Kamal, Hadzli Hashim Mohd Fuad Latip
{"title":"基于成果教育的可考试课程评估工具","authors":"M. Kamal, Hadzli Hashim Mohd Fuad Latip","doi":"10.1109/ICEED.2009.5490590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engineering program offered in Malaysia nowadays, has to be accredited by the Engineering Accreditation Council (EAC) which represents the Board of Engineers Malaysia (BEM) in order to be recognized by Washington Accord signatories' country. Such accreditation would benefit the graduates to look for jobs globally. Outcome-based education (OBE) has become a critical aspect of accreditation requirement and Faculty of Electrical Engineering at Universiti Teknologi MARA has made adaption to both; curriculum and instructional approaches following OBE specifications. OBE is a student-centered learning process that focuses on measuring students' achievement in accordance with the faculty program outcomes based on summative and formative assessments. The faculty has developed several summative assessment tools that are user-friendly to the lecturers using on-shelf technology. These tools are custom-designed to measure student's knowing and doing for the following components: examinable course, course work, laboratories and final year project. The tool for evaluating an examinable course is known as SAMOBEC; acronym for Summative Dynamic Assessment with OBE Compliance. Therefore, this paper describes the utilization of the tool and evaluation for an undergraduate course; ESE352 (Signals and Systems II). This tool would guide lecturers to construct examinable questions structurally based on Bloom's Taxonomy as well as addressing respective course outcomes and program outcomes. The tool would produce outputs that show information about question density on course and program outcomes. Finally, it would provide performance indicators that reflect the students' achievement in addressing the respective course and program outcomes. It is shown that, the systematic approach adopted in this tool has educated and improved academician alertness in designing questions fairly as well as providing them with an insight of their student's attributes.","PeriodicalId":426558,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examinable course assessment tool based on outcome based education\",\"authors\":\"M. Kamal, Hadzli Hashim Mohd Fuad Latip\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICEED.2009.5490590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Engineering program offered in Malaysia nowadays, has to be accredited by the Engineering Accreditation Council (EAC) which represents the Board of Engineers Malaysia (BEM) in order to be recognized by Washington Accord signatories' country. Such accreditation would benefit the graduates to look for jobs globally. Outcome-based education (OBE) has become a critical aspect of accreditation requirement and Faculty of Electrical Engineering at Universiti Teknologi MARA has made adaption to both; curriculum and instructional approaches following OBE specifications. OBE is a student-centered learning process that focuses on measuring students' achievement in accordance with the faculty program outcomes based on summative and formative assessments. The faculty has developed several summative assessment tools that are user-friendly to the lecturers using on-shelf technology. These tools are custom-designed to measure student's knowing and doing for the following components: examinable course, course work, laboratories and final year project. The tool for evaluating an examinable course is known as SAMOBEC; acronym for Summative Dynamic Assessment with OBE Compliance. Therefore, this paper describes the utilization of the tool and evaluation for an undergraduate course; ESE352 (Signals and Systems II). This tool would guide lecturers to construct examinable questions structurally based on Bloom's Taxonomy as well as addressing respective course outcomes and program outcomes. The tool would produce outputs that show information about question density on course and program outcomes. Finally, it would provide performance indicators that reflect the students' achievement in addressing the respective course and program outcomes. It is shown that, the systematic approach adopted in this tool has educated and improved academician alertness in designing questions fairly as well as providing them with an insight of their student's attributes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED)\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2009.5490590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2009.5490590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

如今,马来西亚提供的工程课程必须由代表马来西亚工程师委员会(BEM)的工程认证委员会(EAC)认证,才能得到华盛顿协议签署国的认可。这样的认证将有利于毕业生在全球范围内寻找工作。基于成果的教育(OBE)已经成为认证要求的一个关键方面,而玛拉理工大学的电气工程学院已经适应了这两方面;遵循OBE规范的课程和教学方法。OBE是一个以学生为中心的学习过程,重点是根据总结性和形成性评估的教师项目成果来衡量学生的成就。教师已经开发了几个总结性评估工具,这些工具使用现成的技术对讲师来说是用户友好的。这些工具是定制设计的,用来衡量学生对以下部分的了解和实践:考试课程、课程作业、实验室和期末项目。评估可考试课程的工具被称为SAMOBEC;总结性动态评估与OBE符合性的缩写。因此,本文介绍了该工具的使用和对本科课程的评价;ESE352(信号与系统II)。该工具将指导讲师根据布鲁姆的分类法在结构上构建可考试的问题,并解决各自的课程成果和项目成果。该工具将产生输出,显示有关课程和项目结果的问题密度的信息。最后,它将提供反映学生在解决各自课程和项目成果方面的成就的绩效指标。结果表明,该工具所采用的系统方法,在培养和提高院士设计问题的警觉性的同时,也为他们提供了对学生属性的洞察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examinable course assessment tool based on outcome based education
Engineering program offered in Malaysia nowadays, has to be accredited by the Engineering Accreditation Council (EAC) which represents the Board of Engineers Malaysia (BEM) in order to be recognized by Washington Accord signatories' country. Such accreditation would benefit the graduates to look for jobs globally. Outcome-based education (OBE) has become a critical aspect of accreditation requirement and Faculty of Electrical Engineering at Universiti Teknologi MARA has made adaption to both; curriculum and instructional approaches following OBE specifications. OBE is a student-centered learning process that focuses on measuring students' achievement in accordance with the faculty program outcomes based on summative and formative assessments. The faculty has developed several summative assessment tools that are user-friendly to the lecturers using on-shelf technology. These tools are custom-designed to measure student's knowing and doing for the following components: examinable course, course work, laboratories and final year project. The tool for evaluating an examinable course is known as SAMOBEC; acronym for Summative Dynamic Assessment with OBE Compliance. Therefore, this paper describes the utilization of the tool and evaluation for an undergraduate course; ESE352 (Signals and Systems II). This tool would guide lecturers to construct examinable questions structurally based on Bloom's Taxonomy as well as addressing respective course outcomes and program outcomes. The tool would produce outputs that show information about question density on course and program outcomes. Finally, it would provide performance indicators that reflect the students' achievement in addressing the respective course and program outcomes. It is shown that, the systematic approach adopted in this tool has educated and improved academician alertness in designing questions fairly as well as providing them with an insight of their student's attributes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信