现代视频编解码器的主观比较

2017 Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium - Spring (PIERS) Pub Date : 2017-05-22 DOI:10.1109/PIERS.2017.8261847

P. Cika, D. Kovac, V. Skorpil, T. Srnec

{"title":"现代视频编解码器的主观比较","authors":"P. Cika, D. Kovac, V. Skorpil, T. Srnec","doi":"10.1109/PIERS.2017.8261847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with subjective video assessment methods. The paper begins with a short introduction to video quality evaluation methods. Mainly, it focuses on common subjective measurement methods. Next part of this paper describes videosequences, resolutions and methodology used for video sequence evaluating according to ACR (Absolute Category Rating) method. The results reached from 89 subjects (18–28 years old) are shown in tables in last section.","PeriodicalId":387984,"journal":{"name":"2017 Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium - Spring (PIERS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subjective comparison of modern video codecs\",\"authors\":\"P. Cika, D. Kovac, V. Skorpil, T. Srnec\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PIERS.2017.8261847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with subjective video assessment methods. The paper begins with a short introduction to video quality evaluation methods. Mainly, it focuses on common subjective measurement methods. Next part of this paper describes videosequences, resolutions and methodology used for video sequence evaluating according to ACR (Absolute Category Rating) method. The results reached from 89 subjects (18–28 years old) are shown in tables in last section.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium - Spring (PIERS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium - Spring (PIERS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PIERS.2017.8261847\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium - Spring (PIERS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PIERS.2017.8261847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文研究了主观视频评价方法。本文首先简要介绍了视频质量评价方法。主要介绍了常用的主观测量方法。本文的下一部分描述了视频序列，分辨率和用于视频序列评估的方法，根据ACR(绝对类别评级)方法。89名被试(18-28岁)的调查结果见最后一节的表格。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Subjective comparison of modern video codecs

This paper deals with subjective video assessment methods. The paper begins with a short introduction to video quality evaluation methods. Mainly, it focuses on common subjective measurement methods. Next part of this paper describes videosequences, resolutions and methodology used for video sequence evaluating according to ACR (Absolute Category Rating) method. The results reached from 89 subjects (18–28 years old) are shown in tables in last section.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2017 Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium - Spring (PIERS)

自引率

0.00%

发文量