跨学科、跨层次的写作策略转移:一项写作纵向研究的结果

J. Mullin, Jan Rieman
{"title":"跨学科、跨层次的写作策略转移:一项写作纵向研究的结果","authors":"J. Mullin, Jan Rieman","doi":"10.37514/int-b.2021.1404.2.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resumen / Resumo Whether an educational system has a dedicated writing course, or students learn to write within discipline-specific courses, or if they are tutored in writing centers, writing teachers seldom know if students subsequently use the strategies they are taught. We report here the results from a three-year, longitudinal study of student writing that examined whether students transfer writing strategies they learn in a first-year writing class (FYW) at a U.S. research university to other genres in subsequent classes. Students’ cumulative first-year writing portfolios were coded for evidence of the course’s learning outcome strategies (SLOs). These results were then compared to written work completed in subsequent university courses and to brief questions students answered about the assignments as well as transcripts of participant focus groups. Findings suggest that students do transfer FYW SLOs to other genres, but also raised interesting questions about future research as well as about methodology in longitudinal studies. Ya sea que un sistema educativo implemente cursos de composición, cursos de escritura en las disciplinas, o tutorías en centros de escritura, siempre es difícil determinar si los estudiantes usan las estrategias que les han enseñado. Reportamos los resultados de un estudio longitudinal de tres años en una universidad de investigación en EEUU en el que examinamos si los estudiantes transfieren las estrategias que aprenden en un curso de primer año (FYW) a géneros y cursos posteriores. Los portafolios de escritura de los estudiantes se codificaron en términos de evidencia de los objetivos de aprendizaje del curso","PeriodicalId":111820,"journal":{"name":"Multilingual Contributions to Writing Research: Toward an Equal Academic Exchange","volume":"288 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transferring Writing Strategies Across Disciplines and Levels: Results from a Longitudinal Study of Writing\",\"authors\":\"J. Mullin, Jan Rieman\",\"doi\":\"10.37514/int-b.2021.1404.2.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Resumen / Resumo Whether an educational system has a dedicated writing course, or students learn to write within discipline-specific courses, or if they are tutored in writing centers, writing teachers seldom know if students subsequently use the strategies they are taught. We report here the results from a three-year, longitudinal study of student writing that examined whether students transfer writing strategies they learn in a first-year writing class (FYW) at a U.S. research university to other genres in subsequent classes. Students’ cumulative first-year writing portfolios were coded for evidence of the course’s learning outcome strategies (SLOs). These results were then compared to written work completed in subsequent university courses and to brief questions students answered about the assignments as well as transcripts of participant focus groups. Findings suggest that students do transfer FYW SLOs to other genres, but also raised interesting questions about future research as well as about methodology in longitudinal studies. Ya sea que un sistema educativo implemente cursos de composición, cursos de escritura en las disciplinas, o tutorías en centros de escritura, siempre es difícil determinar si los estudiantes usan las estrategias que les han enseñado. Reportamos los resultados de un estudio longitudinal de tres años en una universidad de investigación en EEUU en el que examinamos si los estudiantes transfieren las estrategias que aprenden en un curso de primer año (FYW) a géneros y cursos posteriores. Los portafolios de escritura de los estudiantes se codificaron en términos de evidencia de los objetivos de aprendizaje del curso\",\"PeriodicalId\":111820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multilingual Contributions to Writing Research: Toward an Equal Academic Exchange\",\"volume\":\"288 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multilingual Contributions to Writing Research: Toward an Equal Academic Exchange\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37514/int-b.2021.1404.2.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multilingual Contributions to Writing Research: Toward an Equal Academic Exchange","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/int-b.2021.1404.2.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无论教育系统是否有专门的写作课程,或者学生是否在特定学科的课程中学习写作,或者他们是否在写作中心接受辅导,写作老师很少知道学生后来是否使用了他们所教的策略。我们在此报告了一项为期三年的学生写作纵向研究的结果,该研究调查了学生是否将他们在美国研究型大学一年级写作课(FYW)中学到的写作策略转移到随后的课程中。学生第一年的累积写作作品集被编码,作为课程学习成果策略(slo)的证据。然后将这些结果与随后完成的大学课程的书面作业、学生回答的关于作业的简短问题以及参与者焦点小组的成绩单进行比较。研究结果表明,学生确实会将FYW slo转移到其他类型,但也提出了关于未来研究以及纵向研究方法的有趣问题。Ya sea que un sistema education实施课程composición,课程设置在各个学科中,或tutorías en centrros de escrtura,即difícil确定的学生数量和策略设置在enseñado。Reportamos de联合国工厂化纵向de los resultados investigacion en美国大学非常岁en una en el examinamos如果顺利洛杉矶transfieren ?拉斯维加斯aprenden在联合国curso de底漆另(FYW) generos y cursos后。学生的职业生涯履历和职业生涯的履历都是有难度的,因为这些履历和职业生涯的目标和职业生涯的证据都是有难度的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transferring Writing Strategies Across Disciplines and Levels: Results from a Longitudinal Study of Writing
Resumen / Resumo Whether an educational system has a dedicated writing course, or students learn to write within discipline-specific courses, or if they are tutored in writing centers, writing teachers seldom know if students subsequently use the strategies they are taught. We report here the results from a three-year, longitudinal study of student writing that examined whether students transfer writing strategies they learn in a first-year writing class (FYW) at a U.S. research university to other genres in subsequent classes. Students’ cumulative first-year writing portfolios were coded for evidence of the course’s learning outcome strategies (SLOs). These results were then compared to written work completed in subsequent university courses and to brief questions students answered about the assignments as well as transcripts of participant focus groups. Findings suggest that students do transfer FYW SLOs to other genres, but also raised interesting questions about future research as well as about methodology in longitudinal studies. Ya sea que un sistema educativo implemente cursos de composición, cursos de escritura en las disciplinas, o tutorías en centros de escritura, siempre es difícil determinar si los estudiantes usan las estrategias que les han enseñado. Reportamos los resultados de un estudio longitudinal de tres años en una universidad de investigación en EEUU en el que examinamos si los estudiantes transfieren las estrategias que aprenden en un curso de primer año (FYW) a géneros y cursos posteriores. Los portafolios de escritura de los estudiantes se codificaron en términos de evidencia de los objetivos de aprendizaje del curso
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信