两种交联透明质酸凝胶治疗颞窝体积损失的稳定性:MRI和视觉观察的初步研究

Micheels P, Besse S, E. B, V. J
{"title":"两种交联透明质酸凝胶治疗颞窝体积损失的稳定性:MRI和视觉观察的初步研究","authors":"Micheels P, Besse S, E. B, V. J","doi":"10.16966/2576-2826.172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Hyaluronic Acid (HA) gels are a commonly used option for correcting facial volume loss. Over the past 2 years, we have been testing the clinical results of two HA gels, without lidocaine, made by the same manufacturer using the patented “Inter- Penetrating NetworkLike” (IPN-Like) cross-linking technology. The aim of this work was to evaluate if there is a difference in the tissue stability and associated clinical outcomes between these two gels. Material and methods: A 67 and 75 years old Caucasian women, from our private aesthetic center, agreed to be injected with the different HA volumiser gel, one in each of their temporal fossae. The Stylage® XL and XXL HA gels (LABORATOIRES VIVACY, Archamps, France) were used for this study. The gels have different concentrations and levels of cross-linking, but have the same indications for correcting facial volume loss resulting from the ageing process. Clinical outcomes included assessing the degree of pain experienced by participants during and after injection using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Aesthetic improvement was evaluated using the Merz Analogic Scale® (MAS)® and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scales completed by patients and independent experts at different pre-set time-points using photographs taken from the front, profile and three-quarter left and right angles. Moreover, Serial magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans were used to assess the tissue behavior of the gels immediately after injection and then 6 monthly for 2 years. Results: Both gels led to an improvement in the patients’ clinical outcomes. This improvement persisted over time. The MRI scans showed that, at Day 0, the injected gel was spherical in shape and became elongated by 6 months. This appearance did not change throughout the follow-up period. The scans showed little resorption at 24 months. Conclusion: Despite the relatively advanced age of the two patients and the small quantities of gel injected, the IPN-Like cross-linked hyaluronic acid volumiser gels had a satisfactory sustainable clinical effect as assessed by patients and experts. There was a slight advantage in favor of the gel with the lower HA concentration but higher level of cross-linking (Stylage® XXL). Given the observed persistent effect of the gels in our preliminary observation, it is now important to conduct a larger study with longer follow- up.","PeriodicalId":281715,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Cosmetic Dermatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability of Two Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Gels for the Treatment of Temporal Fossa Volume Loss: A Preliminary Study Using MRI and Visual Observations\",\"authors\":\"Micheels P, Besse S, E. B, V. J\",\"doi\":\"10.16966/2576-2826.172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Hyaluronic Acid (HA) gels are a commonly used option for correcting facial volume loss. Over the past 2 years, we have been testing the clinical results of two HA gels, without lidocaine, made by the same manufacturer using the patented “Inter- Penetrating NetworkLike” (IPN-Like) cross-linking technology. The aim of this work was to evaluate if there is a difference in the tissue stability and associated clinical outcomes between these two gels. Material and methods: A 67 and 75 years old Caucasian women, from our private aesthetic center, agreed to be injected with the different HA volumiser gel, one in each of their temporal fossae. The Stylage® XL and XXL HA gels (LABORATOIRES VIVACY, Archamps, France) were used for this study. The gels have different concentrations and levels of cross-linking, but have the same indications for correcting facial volume loss resulting from the ageing process. Clinical outcomes included assessing the degree of pain experienced by participants during and after injection using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Aesthetic improvement was evaluated using the Merz Analogic Scale® (MAS)® and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scales completed by patients and independent experts at different pre-set time-points using photographs taken from the front, profile and three-quarter left and right angles. Moreover, Serial magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans were used to assess the tissue behavior of the gels immediately after injection and then 6 monthly for 2 years. Results: Both gels led to an improvement in the patients’ clinical outcomes. This improvement persisted over time. The MRI scans showed that, at Day 0, the injected gel was spherical in shape and became elongated by 6 months. This appearance did not change throughout the follow-up period. The scans showed little resorption at 24 months. Conclusion: Despite the relatively advanced age of the two patients and the small quantities of gel injected, the IPN-Like cross-linked hyaluronic acid volumiser gels had a satisfactory sustainable clinical effect as assessed by patients and experts. There was a slight advantage in favor of the gel with the lower HA concentration but higher level of cross-linking (Stylage® XXL). Given the observed persistent effect of the gels in our preliminary observation, it is now important to conduct a larger study with longer follow- up.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Cosmetic Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Cosmetic Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16966/2576-2826.172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Cosmetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16966/2576-2826.172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

简介:透明质酸(HA)凝胶是纠正面部体积损失的常用选择。在过去的两年里,我们一直在测试两种不含利多卡因的透明质酸凝胶的临床结果,这两种凝胶是由同一家制造商使用专利的“互穿网络”(IPN-Like)交联技术生产的。这项工作的目的是评估这两种凝胶在组织稳定性和相关临床结果方面是否存在差异。材料和方法:一名67岁和75岁的高加索女性,来自我们的私人美容中心,同意在她们的颞窝注射不同的HA丰胸凝胶。本研究使用Stylage®XL和XXL HA凝胶(LABORATOIRES VIVACY, Archamps, France)。这些凝胶具有不同的浓度和交联水平,但对于纠正因衰老过程而导致的面部体积损失具有相同的适应症。临床结果包括使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估参与者在注射期间和注射后所经历的疼痛程度。使用Merz类比量表®(MAS)®和全球美学改善量表(GAIS)量表评估美学改善,该量表由患者和独立专家在不同预先设定的时间点完成,使用从正面,侧面和四分之三左右角度拍摄的照片。此外,使用连续磁共振成像(MRI)扫描评估注射后立即凝胶的组织行为,然后6个月,持续2年。结果:两种凝胶均改善了患者的临床预后。这种改善持续了一段时间。MRI扫描显示,在第0天,注射的凝胶形状为球形,并在6个月后变得细长。这一现象在整个随访期间没有改变。扫描显示24个月时几乎没有吸收。结论:尽管两例患者年龄相对较大,凝胶注射量较小,但经患者和专家评价,ipn样交联透明质酸增量凝胶具有令人满意的持续临床效果。具有较低HA浓度但较高交联水平的凝胶(Stylage®XXL)具有轻微的优势。鉴于在我们的初步观察中观察到凝胶的持久效果,现在重要的是进行更大的研究和更长时间的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stability of Two Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Gels for the Treatment of Temporal Fossa Volume Loss: A Preliminary Study Using MRI and Visual Observations
Introduction: Hyaluronic Acid (HA) gels are a commonly used option for correcting facial volume loss. Over the past 2 years, we have been testing the clinical results of two HA gels, without lidocaine, made by the same manufacturer using the patented “Inter- Penetrating NetworkLike” (IPN-Like) cross-linking technology. The aim of this work was to evaluate if there is a difference in the tissue stability and associated clinical outcomes between these two gels. Material and methods: A 67 and 75 years old Caucasian women, from our private aesthetic center, agreed to be injected with the different HA volumiser gel, one in each of their temporal fossae. The Stylage® XL and XXL HA gels (LABORATOIRES VIVACY, Archamps, France) were used for this study. The gels have different concentrations and levels of cross-linking, but have the same indications for correcting facial volume loss resulting from the ageing process. Clinical outcomes included assessing the degree of pain experienced by participants during and after injection using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Aesthetic improvement was evaluated using the Merz Analogic Scale® (MAS)® and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scales completed by patients and independent experts at different pre-set time-points using photographs taken from the front, profile and three-quarter left and right angles. Moreover, Serial magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans were used to assess the tissue behavior of the gels immediately after injection and then 6 monthly for 2 years. Results: Both gels led to an improvement in the patients’ clinical outcomes. This improvement persisted over time. The MRI scans showed that, at Day 0, the injected gel was spherical in shape and became elongated by 6 months. This appearance did not change throughout the follow-up period. The scans showed little resorption at 24 months. Conclusion: Despite the relatively advanced age of the two patients and the small quantities of gel injected, the IPN-Like cross-linked hyaluronic acid volumiser gels had a satisfactory sustainable clinical effect as assessed by patients and experts. There was a slight advantage in favor of the gel with the lower HA concentration but higher level of cross-linking (Stylage® XXL). Given the observed persistent effect of the gels in our preliminary observation, it is now important to conduct a larger study with longer follow- up.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信