面向计算机的工作中支持人类的认知辅助反映的接受度调查

Valeria Zitz, Matthias Wölfel, Rainer Hoffmann
{"title":"面向计算机的工作中支持人类的认知辅助反映的接受度调查","authors":"Valeria Zitz, Matthias Wölfel, Rainer Hoffmann","doi":"10.1109/CW52790.2021.00034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As more and more sensors find their way into the workplace, new types of digital assistance become possible. Despite their undeniable importance in improving occupational health and safety, there has long been disagreement about how and whether cognitive performance at work should be measured, analyzed, and used to either provide feedback to the user or report to the supervisor. The collection of sensory information is perceived very differently depending on cultural background, personality, device owner, and intended use of the data collected. While personal devices—such as smartwatches—enjoy a high level of acceptance, collecting data on employer devices is generally considered unacceptable and, depending on the country, even prohibited by law. To investigate the perceived usefulness at work, we designed Reflect, which responds to critical user conditions by informing the user. We found that, contrary to common belief, the use of cognitive assistance supporting workers or students in computer-oriented work is perceived positively by most participants and can be increased by emphasizing transparency and fair data processing.","PeriodicalId":199618,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW)","volume":"264 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Acceptance of the Cognitive Assistant Reflect that Supports Humans in Computer-Oriented Work\",\"authors\":\"Valeria Zitz, Matthias Wölfel, Rainer Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CW52790.2021.00034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As more and more sensors find their way into the workplace, new types of digital assistance become possible. Despite their undeniable importance in improving occupational health and safety, there has long been disagreement about how and whether cognitive performance at work should be measured, analyzed, and used to either provide feedback to the user or report to the supervisor. The collection of sensory information is perceived very differently depending on cultural background, personality, device owner, and intended use of the data collected. While personal devices—such as smartwatches—enjoy a high level of acceptance, collecting data on employer devices is generally considered unacceptable and, depending on the country, even prohibited by law. To investigate the perceived usefulness at work, we designed Reflect, which responds to critical user conditions by informing the user. We found that, contrary to common belief, the use of cognitive assistance supporting workers or students in computer-oriented work is perceived positively by most participants and can be increased by emphasizing transparency and fair data processing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW)\",\"volume\":\"264 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CW52790.2021.00034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CW52790.2021.00034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着越来越多的传感器进入工作场所,新型数字辅助成为可能。尽管认知表现在改善职业健康和安全方面具有不可否认的重要性,但长期以来,人们对如何以及是否应该测量、分析工作中的认知表现,并将其用于向用户提供反馈或向主管报告一直存在分歧。根据文化背景、个性、设备所有者和收集数据的预期用途,感知感官信息的收集有很大的不同。虽然个人设备(如智能手表)的接受度很高,但在雇主设备上收集数据通常被认为是不可接受的,甚至在某些国家甚至被法律禁止。为了调查工作中的感知有用性,我们设计了Reflect,它通过通知用户来响应关键的用户条件。我们发现,与通常的看法相反,大多数参与者认为在计算机导向的工作中使用认知辅助支持工人或学生是积极的,并且可以通过强调透明度和公平的数据处理来增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the Acceptance of the Cognitive Assistant Reflect that Supports Humans in Computer-Oriented Work
As more and more sensors find their way into the workplace, new types of digital assistance become possible. Despite their undeniable importance in improving occupational health and safety, there has long been disagreement about how and whether cognitive performance at work should be measured, analyzed, and used to either provide feedback to the user or report to the supervisor. The collection of sensory information is perceived very differently depending on cultural background, personality, device owner, and intended use of the data collected. While personal devices—such as smartwatches—enjoy a high level of acceptance, collecting data on employer devices is generally considered unacceptable and, depending on the country, even prohibited by law. To investigate the perceived usefulness at work, we designed Reflect, which responds to critical user conditions by informing the user. We found that, contrary to common belief, the use of cognitive assistance supporting workers or students in computer-oriented work is perceived positively by most participants and can be increased by emphasizing transparency and fair data processing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信