克服三角危机(csr-kscs-soc),并于1926年12月任命一名代表前往亚喀尔巴阡山脉

Yu.V. Danylets
{"title":"克服三角危机(csr-kscs-soc),并于1926年12月任命一名代表前往亚喀尔巴阡山脉","authors":"Yu.V. Danylets","doi":"10.24144/2523-4498.1(46).2022.258203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the problem of institutional development of the Orthodox Church in Subcarpathian Rus' in the second half of 1926. The author examines the diplomatic negotiations between the governments of Czechoslovakia (hereinafter - CSR) and the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes (hereinafter - KSCS), with the leadership of the Serbian Orthodox Church (hereinafter - SOC) and representatives of the Orthodox communities in Subcarpathian Rus'. Particular attention is paid to the persistent demands of the SOC to preserve its rights to elect and appoint bishops. Based on a study of archival documents, the author established that the government in Prague, following the Austro-Hungarian policy, sought to take control of the selection of candidates and the approval of bishops. The article summarizes new material on the research topic and introduces many documents from the Serbian and Czech archives into scientific circulation. Among them are decisions of the Synod of the SOC, internal correspondence of the Synod with the Council of the SOC, personal correspondence of bishops with the patriarch and leaders of the Orthodox movement in Subcarpathian Rus', diplomatic correspondence between Czechoslovakia and KSCS, secret correspondence sent in Belgrade with the Prague Ministry. The article also examines the critical stages of agreeing on the candidacy of the SOC delegate for Orthodox communities of Serbian jurisdiction in the province, who was instructed to complete the development of the diocesan statute and achieve official recognition of Orthodox in the country. The opinion that the most acceptable candidate for Prague was the sinkel Damaskin (Grdanichka), the ordination of which was postponed by the dignitaries of the SOC, is substantiated. Instead, Bishop Irenaeus (Chirich) of Novosad-Bachka was delegated to Subcarpathian Rus', an experienced church figure who managed to prepare the ground for the institutional completion of the Orthodox Church in the autonomy.","PeriodicalId":390649,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series: History","volume":"40 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OVERCOMING THE CRISIS IN THE TRIANGLE (CSR-KSCS-SOC) AND THE APPOINTMENT OF A DELEGATE TO SUBCARPATHIAN RUS' IN DECEMBER 1926\",\"authors\":\"Yu.V. Danylets\",\"doi\":\"10.24144/2523-4498.1(46).2022.258203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the problem of institutional development of the Orthodox Church in Subcarpathian Rus' in the second half of 1926. The author examines the diplomatic negotiations between the governments of Czechoslovakia (hereinafter - CSR) and the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes (hereinafter - KSCS), with the leadership of the Serbian Orthodox Church (hereinafter - SOC) and representatives of the Orthodox communities in Subcarpathian Rus'. Particular attention is paid to the persistent demands of the SOC to preserve its rights to elect and appoint bishops. Based on a study of archival documents, the author established that the government in Prague, following the Austro-Hungarian policy, sought to take control of the selection of candidates and the approval of bishops. The article summarizes new material on the research topic and introduces many documents from the Serbian and Czech archives into scientific circulation. Among them are decisions of the Synod of the SOC, internal correspondence of the Synod with the Council of the SOC, personal correspondence of bishops with the patriarch and leaders of the Orthodox movement in Subcarpathian Rus', diplomatic correspondence between Czechoslovakia and KSCS, secret correspondence sent in Belgrade with the Prague Ministry. The article also examines the critical stages of agreeing on the candidacy of the SOC delegate for Orthodox communities of Serbian jurisdiction in the province, who was instructed to complete the development of the diocesan statute and achieve official recognition of Orthodox in the country. The opinion that the most acceptable candidate for Prague was the sinkel Damaskin (Grdanichka), the ordination of which was postponed by the dignitaries of the SOC, is substantiated. Instead, Bishop Irenaeus (Chirich) of Novosad-Bachka was delegated to Subcarpathian Rus', an experienced church figure who managed to prepare the ground for the institutional completion of the Orthodox Church in the autonomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":390649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series: History\",\"volume\":\"40 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series: History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24144/2523-4498.1(46).2022.258203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series: History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2523-4498.1(46).2022.258203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了1926年下半年苏喀尔巴阡罗斯东正教会的制度发展问题。作者考察了捷克斯洛伐克政府(以下简称“CSR”)与塞尔维亚、克罗地亚和斯洛文尼亚王国(以下简称“KSCS”)之间的外交谈判,谈判由塞尔维亚东正教会(以下简称“SOC”)的领导和萨喀尔巴阡罗斯东正教社区的代表进行。特别值得注意的是,SOC坚持要求保留其选举和任命主教的权利。根据对档案文件的研究,发件人确定,布拉格政府遵循奥匈政策,试图控制候选人的选择和主教的批准。本文总结了研究课题的新材料,并将塞尔维亚和捷克的许多档案文献介绍到科学流通中。其中包括SOC主教会议的决定,主教会议与SOC理事会的内部通信,主教与宗主教和俄罗斯Subcarpathian东正教运动领导人的私人通信,捷克斯洛伐克与KSCS之间的外交通信,以及在贝尔格莱德与布拉格部发送的秘密通信。文章还探讨了同意该省塞尔维亚管辖的东正教社区SOC代表候选人资格的关键阶段,该代表被指示完成教区法规的发展,并在该国获得东正教的官方承认。布拉格最可接受的候选人是sink Damaskin (Grdanichka),其任命被SOC的政要推迟,这一观点得到了证实。相反,Novosad-Bachka的主教Irenaeus (Chirich)被委派给Subcarpathian Rus',一个经验丰富的教会人物,他成功地为自治中东正教会的制度完成做好了准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OVERCOMING THE CRISIS IN THE TRIANGLE (CSR-KSCS-SOC) AND THE APPOINTMENT OF A DELEGATE TO SUBCARPATHIAN RUS' IN DECEMBER 1926
This article examines the problem of institutional development of the Orthodox Church in Subcarpathian Rus' in the second half of 1926. The author examines the diplomatic negotiations between the governments of Czechoslovakia (hereinafter - CSR) and the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes (hereinafter - KSCS), with the leadership of the Serbian Orthodox Church (hereinafter - SOC) and representatives of the Orthodox communities in Subcarpathian Rus'. Particular attention is paid to the persistent demands of the SOC to preserve its rights to elect and appoint bishops. Based on a study of archival documents, the author established that the government in Prague, following the Austro-Hungarian policy, sought to take control of the selection of candidates and the approval of bishops. The article summarizes new material on the research topic and introduces many documents from the Serbian and Czech archives into scientific circulation. Among them are decisions of the Synod of the SOC, internal correspondence of the Synod with the Council of the SOC, personal correspondence of bishops with the patriarch and leaders of the Orthodox movement in Subcarpathian Rus', diplomatic correspondence between Czechoslovakia and KSCS, secret correspondence sent in Belgrade with the Prague Ministry. The article also examines the critical stages of agreeing on the candidacy of the SOC delegate for Orthodox communities of Serbian jurisdiction in the province, who was instructed to complete the development of the diocesan statute and achieve official recognition of Orthodox in the country. The opinion that the most acceptable candidate for Prague was the sinkel Damaskin (Grdanichka), the ordination of which was postponed by the dignitaries of the SOC, is substantiated. Instead, Bishop Irenaeus (Chirich) of Novosad-Bachka was delegated to Subcarpathian Rus', an experienced church figure who managed to prepare the ground for the institutional completion of the Orthodox Church in the autonomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信