关于成熟度模型的十大误解

Kim Normann Andersen, Jungwoo Lee, Tobias Mettler, M. J. Moon
{"title":"关于成熟度模型的十大误解","authors":"Kim Normann Andersen, Jungwoo Lee, Tobias Mettler, M. J. Moon","doi":"10.1145/3396956.3396980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we take the initial steps of re-formulating the research agenda on maturity models within the government context. Critiques on maturity models in government digitalization has been collected via a systematic review of academic literature. Synthesis of the articles (n=47) has resulted in a list of ten objections and critique of maturity models. The author team of this paper has been heavily involved in pioneering and leading research on maturity models. Standing on the shoulders of this track-record, we have coinedf a possible response on how maturity models might still have an important role to play in theorizing about why, how and where government progresses in their use of digital technologies. Also, we argue that maturity models have an important role to play for practice in their navigation in a yet more multifaceted technological dependent government.","PeriodicalId":118651,"journal":{"name":"The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten Misunderstandings about Maturity Models\",\"authors\":\"Kim Normann Andersen, Jungwoo Lee, Tobias Mettler, M. J. Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3396956.3396980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we take the initial steps of re-formulating the research agenda on maturity models within the government context. Critiques on maturity models in government digitalization has been collected via a systematic review of academic literature. Synthesis of the articles (n=47) has resulted in a list of ten objections and critique of maturity models. The author team of this paper has been heavily involved in pioneering and leading research on maturity models. Standing on the shoulders of this track-record, we have coinedf a possible response on how maturity models might still have an important role to play in theorizing about why, how and where government progresses in their use of digital technologies. Also, we argue that maturity models have an important role to play for practice in their navigation in a yet more multifaceted technological dependent government.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3396980\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3396980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文对政府背景下的成熟度模型的研究议程进行了初步的梳理。通过对学术文献的系统回顾,收集了对政府数字化成熟度模型的批评意见。综合这些文章(n=47)得出了对成熟度模型的十个反对和批评的列表。本文的作者团队一直积极参与成熟度模型的开创性和领先研究。站在这一记录的肩膀上,我们提出了一个可能的回应,即成熟度模型如何在理论化政府为什么、如何以及在哪里使用数字技术方面发挥重要作用。此外,我们认为成熟度模型在一个更加多方面的技术依赖政府中具有重要的实践作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ten Misunderstandings about Maturity Models
In this paper, we take the initial steps of re-formulating the research agenda on maturity models within the government context. Critiques on maturity models in government digitalization has been collected via a systematic review of academic literature. Synthesis of the articles (n=47) has resulted in a list of ten objections and critique of maturity models. The author team of this paper has been heavily involved in pioneering and leading research on maturity models. Standing on the shoulders of this track-record, we have coinedf a possible response on how maturity models might still have an important role to play in theorizing about why, how and where government progresses in their use of digital technologies. Also, we argue that maturity models have an important role to play for practice in their navigation in a yet more multifaceted technological dependent government.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信