绿色还是洗绿?调查消费者是否和何时能够识别绿色清洗

Stefanie Fella, Elena Bausa
{"title":"绿色还是洗绿?调查消费者是否和何时能够识别绿色清洗","authors":"Stefanie Fella, Elena Bausa","doi":"10.51300/brp-2023-95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today's market, both companies and consumers face the challenge of navigating the pitfalls of greenwashing when it comes to a myriad of new and existing green products. This study examines consumer perceptions of such products and questions whether they can accurately identify greenwashing. Failure to do so could undermine a market for genuinely green products and have potentially detrimental effects on society and the environment. Drawing on categorization theory, consumers may categorize a new product as either honestly green, greenwashed, or regular based on prior knowledge of different green cues. We tested this ability using fictitious cleaning products in a within-subject experiment (N = 174) conducted in Germany and found that consumers often fall for greenwashing when asked solely about their purchase intentions. It seems that only when the participants are asked about the perceived greenness and greenwashing of the products are they able to spot the differences inherent to the green products. This research makes two academic contributions. First, our results extend the literature on consumer perceptions of green(washed) verbal and visual product cues. Second, we provide initial evidence against the implicit assumption in the greenwashing and green advertising literature that consumers can distinguish between greenwashed and honestly green products. Our findings provide potential guidance for practitioners in communicating sustainable product improvements without creating an impression of greenwashing. At the same time, this research may inform public policy regarding further measures needed to help consumers unmask greenwashing in purchase contexts.","PeriodicalId":107841,"journal":{"name":"Business Research Proceedings","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green or Greenwashed? Examining Whether and When Consumers Are Able to Identify Greenwashing\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie Fella, Elena Bausa\",\"doi\":\"10.51300/brp-2023-95\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In today's market, both companies and consumers face the challenge of navigating the pitfalls of greenwashing when it comes to a myriad of new and existing green products. This study examines consumer perceptions of such products and questions whether they can accurately identify greenwashing. Failure to do so could undermine a market for genuinely green products and have potentially detrimental effects on society and the environment. Drawing on categorization theory, consumers may categorize a new product as either honestly green, greenwashed, or regular based on prior knowledge of different green cues. We tested this ability using fictitious cleaning products in a within-subject experiment (N = 174) conducted in Germany and found that consumers often fall for greenwashing when asked solely about their purchase intentions. It seems that only when the participants are asked about the perceived greenness and greenwashing of the products are they able to spot the differences inherent to the green products. This research makes two academic contributions. First, our results extend the literature on consumer perceptions of green(washed) verbal and visual product cues. Second, we provide initial evidence against the implicit assumption in the greenwashing and green advertising literature that consumers can distinguish between greenwashed and honestly green products. Our findings provide potential guidance for practitioners in communicating sustainable product improvements without creating an impression of greenwashing. At the same time, this research may inform public policy regarding further measures needed to help consumers unmask greenwashing in purchase contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Research Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Research Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51300/brp-2023-95\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Research Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51300/brp-2023-95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在今天的市场上,当涉及到无数新的和现有的绿色产品时,公司和消费者都面临着导航绿色洗白陷阱的挑战。这项研究考察了消费者对这类产品的看法,并质疑他们是否能准确地识别出“漂绿”。如果做不到这一点,可能会破坏真正绿色产品的市场,并对社会和环境产生潜在的有害影响。根据分类理论,消费者可能会根据对不同绿色线索的先验知识,将新产品分类为真正的绿色,绿色清洗或常规。我们在德国进行的一项受试者内实验(N = 174)中使用虚构的清洁产品来测试这种能力,发现消费者在被问及购买意图时往往会倾向于绿色清洗。似乎只有当参与者被问及产品的感知绿色和绿色洗涤时,他们才能发现绿色产品固有的差异。本研究有两个学术贡献。首先,我们的研究结果扩展了消费者对绿色(水洗)口头和视觉产品线索的看法。其次,我们提供了初步证据,反驳了绿洗和绿色广告文献中隐含的假设,即消费者可以区分绿洗和真正的绿色产品。我们的研究结果为从业者提供了潜在的指导,以沟通可持续的产品改进,而不会造成绿色清洗的印象。与此同时,这项研究可能会为公共政策提供进一步的措施,以帮助消费者在购买过程中揭露“漂绿”行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Green or Greenwashed? Examining Whether and When Consumers Are Able to Identify Greenwashing
In today's market, both companies and consumers face the challenge of navigating the pitfalls of greenwashing when it comes to a myriad of new and existing green products. This study examines consumer perceptions of such products and questions whether they can accurately identify greenwashing. Failure to do so could undermine a market for genuinely green products and have potentially detrimental effects on society and the environment. Drawing on categorization theory, consumers may categorize a new product as either honestly green, greenwashed, or regular based on prior knowledge of different green cues. We tested this ability using fictitious cleaning products in a within-subject experiment (N = 174) conducted in Germany and found that consumers often fall for greenwashing when asked solely about their purchase intentions. It seems that only when the participants are asked about the perceived greenness and greenwashing of the products are they able to spot the differences inherent to the green products. This research makes two academic contributions. First, our results extend the literature on consumer perceptions of green(washed) verbal and visual product cues. Second, we provide initial evidence against the implicit assumption in the greenwashing and green advertising literature that consumers can distinguish between greenwashed and honestly green products. Our findings provide potential guidance for practitioners in communicating sustainable product improvements without creating an impression of greenwashing. At the same time, this research may inform public policy regarding further measures needed to help consumers unmask greenwashing in purchase contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信