住宅电动汽车智能充电管理策略的性能与实施要求

Manoj Kumar Cebol Sundarrajan, Jesse Bennett, D. Scoffield, Kalpesh Chaudhari, A. Meintz, Timothy D. Pennington, Bo Zhang
{"title":"住宅电动汽车智能充电管理策略的性能与实施要求","authors":"Manoj Kumar Cebol Sundarrajan, Jesse Bennett, D. Scoffield, Kalpesh Chaudhari, A. Meintz, Timothy D. Pennington, Bo Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ITEC55900.2023.10186998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the electrification of transportation expands, electric vehicle (EV) charging as residential loads will continue to grow. Residential EV charging has the potential to increase feeder peak loads and decrease voltage quality. As a result of this growing energy demand driven by EV, utilities may employ the use of smart charge management (SCM) controls to modify charging load profiles and mitigate these grid impacts. It is important that utilities understand both the potential benefits-as well as possible implementation challenges-before considering this technology as a solution to managing growing EV loads. In order for an SCM strategy to be an effective solution, the potential benefits must outweigh the implementation challenges. This study establishes and tests a novel framework to assess the implementation requirements of different SCM controls. It identifies a range of requirements specific to various SCM controls and implementation approaches to compare the relative challenges associated with the deployment of each. When paired with analysis on the effectiveness of the ability of each control to mitigate grid impacts from EV charging, this assessment is critical in comparing the value potential of different SCM controls.","PeriodicalId":234784,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC)","volume":"17 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance and Implementation Requirements for Residential EV Smart Charge Management Strategies\",\"authors\":\"Manoj Kumar Cebol Sundarrajan, Jesse Bennett, D. Scoffield, Kalpesh Chaudhari, A. Meintz, Timothy D. Pennington, Bo Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITEC55900.2023.10186998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the electrification of transportation expands, electric vehicle (EV) charging as residential loads will continue to grow. Residential EV charging has the potential to increase feeder peak loads and decrease voltage quality. As a result of this growing energy demand driven by EV, utilities may employ the use of smart charge management (SCM) controls to modify charging load profiles and mitigate these grid impacts. It is important that utilities understand both the potential benefits-as well as possible implementation challenges-before considering this technology as a solution to managing growing EV loads. In order for an SCM strategy to be an effective solution, the potential benefits must outweigh the implementation challenges. This study establishes and tests a novel framework to assess the implementation requirements of different SCM controls. It identifies a range of requirements specific to various SCM controls and implementation approaches to compare the relative challenges associated with the deployment of each. When paired with analysis on the effectiveness of the ability of each control to mitigate grid impacts from EV charging, this assessment is critical in comparing the value potential of different SCM controls.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC)\",\"volume\":\"17 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITEC55900.2023.10186998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITEC55900.2023.10186998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着交通运输电气化的扩大,电动汽车充电作为住宅负荷将继续增长。住宅电动汽车充电有可能增加馈线峰值负荷并降低电压质量。由于电动汽车驱动的能源需求不断增长,公用事业公司可能会采用智能充电管理(SCM)控制来修改充电负荷概况,减轻对电网的影响。重要的是,在考虑将这项技术作为管理不断增长的电动汽车负荷的解决方案之前,公用事业公司必须了解其潜在的好处,以及可能的实施挑战。为了使SCM策略成为有效的解决方案,潜在的好处必须大于实现的挑战。本研究建立并测试了一个新的框架来评估不同SCM控制的实施需求。它确定了一系列特定于各种SCM控制和实现方法的需求,以比较与每种部署相关的相对挑战。当与每种控制措施减轻电动汽车充电对电网影响的有效性分析相结合时,这种评估对于比较不同SCM控制措施的价值潜力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance and Implementation Requirements for Residential EV Smart Charge Management Strategies
As the electrification of transportation expands, electric vehicle (EV) charging as residential loads will continue to grow. Residential EV charging has the potential to increase feeder peak loads and decrease voltage quality. As a result of this growing energy demand driven by EV, utilities may employ the use of smart charge management (SCM) controls to modify charging load profiles and mitigate these grid impacts. It is important that utilities understand both the potential benefits-as well as possible implementation challenges-before considering this technology as a solution to managing growing EV loads. In order for an SCM strategy to be an effective solution, the potential benefits must outweigh the implementation challenges. This study establishes and tests a novel framework to assess the implementation requirements of different SCM controls. It identifies a range of requirements specific to various SCM controls and implementation approaches to compare the relative challenges associated with the deployment of each. When paired with analysis on the effectiveness of the ability of each control to mitigate grid impacts from EV charging, this assessment is critical in comparing the value potential of different SCM controls.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信