基于学习的问题情境模式对高中生数学批判性思维能力和自我效能感的提升

Waode Listiani
{"title":"基于学习的问题情境模式对高中生数学批判性思维能力和自我效能感的提升","authors":"Waode Listiani","doi":"10.31327/JOMEDU.V1I2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem in this research is the low geometric reasoning abilities related to levels that van Hiele level 2 (abstraction) and level 3 (deduction) are not achieved its full potential. This research is a quasi experimental design with nonequivalen control group design. This is influenced by the students' ability to reason logically problem remains low, there has been no student's readiness or understanding of mathematical concepts is not optimal. Low student confidence shown from negative attitudes to learning. Based on the results of the study found that: 1) learning model van Hiele had a greater impact than conventional learning models to geometric reasoning abilities of students; 2) learning model van Hiele had a greater impact than conventional learning models to geometric reasoning skills in students who have high self-efficacy; 3) The learning model van Hiele had a greater impact than conventional learning models to geometric reasoning skills in students who have self-efficacy were; 4) There is no influence of van Hiele model of learning and conventional learning models to geometric reasoning skills in students who have low self-efficacy","PeriodicalId":337698,"journal":{"name":"JME (Journal of Mathematics Education)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE ENHANCEMENT OF MATHEMATICAL CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS AND SELF-EFFICACY AT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS THROUGH LEARNING- BASED PROBLEMS CONTEXTUAL MODEL\",\"authors\":\"Waode Listiani\",\"doi\":\"10.31327/JOMEDU.V1I2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem in this research is the low geometric reasoning abilities related to levels that van Hiele level 2 (abstraction) and level 3 (deduction) are not achieved its full potential. This research is a quasi experimental design with nonequivalen control group design. This is influenced by the students' ability to reason logically problem remains low, there has been no student's readiness or understanding of mathematical concepts is not optimal. Low student confidence shown from negative attitudes to learning. Based on the results of the study found that: 1) learning model van Hiele had a greater impact than conventional learning models to geometric reasoning abilities of students; 2) learning model van Hiele had a greater impact than conventional learning models to geometric reasoning skills in students who have high self-efficacy; 3) The learning model van Hiele had a greater impact than conventional learning models to geometric reasoning skills in students who have self-efficacy were; 4) There is no influence of van Hiele model of learning and conventional learning models to geometric reasoning skills in students who have low self-efficacy\",\"PeriodicalId\":337698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JME (Journal of Mathematics Education)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JME (Journal of Mathematics Education)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31327/JOMEDU.V1I2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JME (Journal of Mathematics Education)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31327/JOMEDU.V1I2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究的问题在于van Hiele第2级(抽象)和第3级(演绎)相关层次的几何推理能力较低,没有充分发挥其潜力。本研究采用非等效对照组设计的准实验设计。这是受学生逻辑推理能力低下问题的影响,没有出现学生对数学概念的准备或理解不够理想的情况。消极的学习态度表现出学生的自信心不足。基于研究结果发现:1)van Hiele学习模式对学生几何推理能力的影响大于传统学习模式;2) van Hiele学习模式对高自我效能学生几何推理技能的影响大于传统学习模式;3) van Hiele学习模式对具有自我效能感的学生几何推理能力的影响大于传统学习模式;4)低自我效能感学生的几何推理能力不受van Hiele学习模式和传统学习模式的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE ENHANCEMENT OF MATHEMATICAL CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS AND SELF-EFFICACY AT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS THROUGH LEARNING- BASED PROBLEMS CONTEXTUAL MODEL
The problem in this research is the low geometric reasoning abilities related to levels that van Hiele level 2 (abstraction) and level 3 (deduction) are not achieved its full potential. This research is a quasi experimental design with nonequivalen control group design. This is influenced by the students' ability to reason logically problem remains low, there has been no student's readiness or understanding of mathematical concepts is not optimal. Low student confidence shown from negative attitudes to learning. Based on the results of the study found that: 1) learning model van Hiele had a greater impact than conventional learning models to geometric reasoning abilities of students; 2) learning model van Hiele had a greater impact than conventional learning models to geometric reasoning skills in students who have high self-efficacy; 3) The learning model van Hiele had a greater impact than conventional learning models to geometric reasoning skills in students who have self-efficacy were; 4) There is no influence of van Hiele model of learning and conventional learning models to geometric reasoning skills in students who have low self-efficacy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信