通过模型检查证明序列一致性

T. Braun, A. Condon, A. Hu, Kai S. Juse, Marius Laza, Michael Leslie, Rita Sharma
{"title":"通过模型检查证明序列一致性","authors":"T. Braun, A. Condon, A. Hu, Kai S. Juse, Marius Laza, Michael Leslie, Rita Sharma","doi":"10.1109/HLDVT.2001.972815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sequential consistency is a multiprocessor memory model of both practical and theoretical importance. Unfortunately, the general problem of verifying that a finite-state protocol implements sequential consistency is undecidable, and in practice, validating that a real-world, finite-state protocol implements sequential consistency is very time-consuming and costly. In this work, we show that for memory protocols that occur in practice, a small amount of manual effort can reduce the problem of verifying sequential consistency into a verification task that can be discharged automatically via model checking. Furthermore, we present experimental results on a substantial, directory-based cache coherence protocol, which demonstrate the practicality of our approach.","PeriodicalId":188469,"journal":{"name":"Sixth IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proving sequential consistency by model checking\",\"authors\":\"T. Braun, A. Condon, A. Hu, Kai S. Juse, Marius Laza, Michael Leslie, Rita Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HLDVT.2001.972815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sequential consistency is a multiprocessor memory model of both practical and theoretical importance. Unfortunately, the general problem of verifying that a finite-state protocol implements sequential consistency is undecidable, and in practice, validating that a real-world, finite-state protocol implements sequential consistency is very time-consuming and costly. In this work, we show that for memory protocols that occur in practice, a small amount of manual effort can reduce the problem of verifying sequential consistency into a verification task that can be discharged automatically via model checking. Furthermore, we present experimental results on a substantial, directory-based cache coherence protocol, which demonstrate the practicality of our approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":188469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sixth IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sixth IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2001.972815\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sixth IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2001.972815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

顺序一致性是一种多处理器内存模型,具有重要的理论和实践意义。不幸的是,验证有限状态协议实现顺序一致性的一般问题是无法确定的,并且在实践中,验证现实世界的有限状态协议实现顺序一致性非常耗时且昂贵。在这项工作中,我们表明,对于在实践中出现的内存协议,少量的手工工作可以将验证顺序一致性的问题减少为可以通过模型检查自动执行的验证任务。此外,我们提出了一个实质性的,基于目录的缓存一致性协议的实验结果,这证明了我们的方法的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proving sequential consistency by model checking
Sequential consistency is a multiprocessor memory model of both practical and theoretical importance. Unfortunately, the general problem of verifying that a finite-state protocol implements sequential consistency is undecidable, and in practice, validating that a real-world, finite-state protocol implements sequential consistency is very time-consuming and costly. In this work, we show that for memory protocols that occur in practice, a small amount of manual effort can reduce the problem of verifying sequential consistency into a verification task that can be discharged automatically via model checking. Furthermore, we present experimental results on a substantial, directory-based cache coherence protocol, which demonstrate the practicality of our approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信