从承包商的角度来看,最佳价值采购

Emilie Sofie Lesjø, P. Wondimu, O. Lædre
{"title":"从承包商的角度来看,最佳价值采购","authors":"Emilie Sofie Lesjø, P. Wondimu, O. Lædre","doi":"10.24928/2019/0190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Best Value Procurement (BVP) was introduced in Norway in 2016. Since then, more than ten pilot projects have tested the method. So far, limited research has been carried out to explore the contractors’ experiences on BVP to improve the method for future projects. The purpose of this paper is to fill part of this research gap by exploring a contractor’s experiences from several projects using the method. By looking at five road projects that have tested out the BVP method, a trend can be seen in how the evaluation of the offers was conducted. Data was collected from five pilot road projects through three in-depth interviews with key persons and a document study. The results show how the evaluation of the price aspect has changed over time. In three of the five projects, a formula was used that urged the contractors to set prices low in order to score additional points. This formula gained criticism from both the contractors and the BVP experts hired to help the contractors. BVP has contributed, to a certain extent, to Lean implementation. However, the practice should be improved to increase value and transparency and minimize conflict and waste.","PeriodicalId":278113,"journal":{"name":"Proc. 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best Value Procurement From a Contractor Point of View\",\"authors\":\"Emilie Sofie Lesjø, P. Wondimu, O. Lædre\",\"doi\":\"10.24928/2019/0190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Best Value Procurement (BVP) was introduced in Norway in 2016. Since then, more than ten pilot projects have tested the method. So far, limited research has been carried out to explore the contractors’ experiences on BVP to improve the method for future projects. The purpose of this paper is to fill part of this research gap by exploring a contractor’s experiences from several projects using the method. By looking at five road projects that have tested out the BVP method, a trend can be seen in how the evaluation of the offers was conducted. Data was collected from five pilot road projects through three in-depth interviews with key persons and a document study. The results show how the evaluation of the price aspect has changed over time. In three of the five projects, a formula was used that urged the contractors to set prices low in order to score additional points. This formula gained criticism from both the contractors and the BVP experts hired to help the contractors. BVP has contributed, to a certain extent, to Lean implementation. However, the practice should be improved to increase value and transparency and minimize conflict and waste.\",\"PeriodicalId\":278113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proc. 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proc. 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24928/2019/0190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proc. 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24928/2019/0190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

最佳价值采购(BVP)于2016年在挪威引入。从那时起,已有十多个试点项目对这种方法进行了测试。到目前为止,对承包商在BVP方面的经验进行了有限的研究,以改进未来项目的方法。本文的目的是通过探索承包商在几个项目中使用该方法的经验来填补部分研究空白。通过观察已经测试了BVP方法的五个道路项目,可以看到如何进行报价评估的趋势。通过对关键人物的三次深度访谈和文献研究,从五个试点道路项目中收集数据。结果显示了价格方面的评价是如何随着时间而变化的。在五个项目中,有三个项目采用了一个公式,敦促承包商将价格定得较低,以获得额外的分数。这个公式受到了承包商和聘请来帮助承包商的BVP专家的批评。BVP在一定程度上为精益的实施做出了贡献。然而,应该改进实践,以增加价值和透明度,并尽量减少冲突和浪费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Best Value Procurement From a Contractor Point of View
Best Value Procurement (BVP) was introduced in Norway in 2016. Since then, more than ten pilot projects have tested the method. So far, limited research has been carried out to explore the contractors’ experiences on BVP to improve the method for future projects. The purpose of this paper is to fill part of this research gap by exploring a contractor’s experiences from several projects using the method. By looking at five road projects that have tested out the BVP method, a trend can be seen in how the evaluation of the offers was conducted. Data was collected from five pilot road projects through three in-depth interviews with key persons and a document study. The results show how the evaluation of the price aspect has changed over time. In three of the five projects, a formula was used that urged the contractors to set prices low in order to score additional points. This formula gained criticism from both the contractors and the BVP experts hired to help the contractors. BVP has contributed, to a certain extent, to Lean implementation. However, the practice should be improved to increase value and transparency and minimize conflict and waste.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信