精神分裂症的语言标记:名义指称研究

Monica De Freitas Frias Chaves, Cilene Aparecida Nunes Rodrigues
{"title":"精神分裂症的语言标记:名义指称研究","authors":"Monica De Freitas Frias Chaves, Cilene Aparecida Nunes Rodrigues","doi":"10.25189/rabralin.v21i1.2092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Semantic impairments are considered linguistic identifiers of schizotypal personality disorder. Particularly, failures in building reference of nominal expressions have been said to distinguish schizophrenia, high-schizotypy and control groups, and these failures reflect difficulties in using linguistic contextual cues. Our experimental study investigated covariances between schizotypal traits, in a nonclinical population, and interpretations of definite singular nominal expressions as referring either to kinds of objects (generic reading) or to specific objects (specific reading). The experiment was conducted in Brazilian Portuguese, where specific reading is the strong/default meaning of definite singular nominals, while generic reading is the weak meaning, being dependent on contextual information.  Results indicate associations between interpretation of definite singular nominals and two schizotypal traits: constricted affect (a negative trait) and unusual perceptual experiences (a positive trait). Speakers in general had preference for assigning specific interpretations to definite singular nominals. Those with higher measurements of constricted affect and lower traits of unusual perceptual experiences, however, showed significant higher preference for this reading with an additive effect in discourse-contexts containing cues for specificity. This suggests that schizotypal traits might manifest themselves within language as a tendency to hold onto strong meaning.","PeriodicalId":298582,"journal":{"name":"Revista da ABRALIN","volume":"264 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linguistic marker of schizotypy: a study on nominal reference\",\"authors\":\"Monica De Freitas Frias Chaves, Cilene Aparecida Nunes Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.25189/rabralin.v21i1.2092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Semantic impairments are considered linguistic identifiers of schizotypal personality disorder. Particularly, failures in building reference of nominal expressions have been said to distinguish schizophrenia, high-schizotypy and control groups, and these failures reflect difficulties in using linguistic contextual cues. Our experimental study investigated covariances between schizotypal traits, in a nonclinical population, and interpretations of definite singular nominal expressions as referring either to kinds of objects (generic reading) or to specific objects (specific reading). The experiment was conducted in Brazilian Portuguese, where specific reading is the strong/default meaning of definite singular nominals, while generic reading is the weak meaning, being dependent on contextual information.  Results indicate associations between interpretation of definite singular nominals and two schizotypal traits: constricted affect (a negative trait) and unusual perceptual experiences (a positive trait). Speakers in general had preference for assigning specific interpretations to definite singular nominals. Those with higher measurements of constricted affect and lower traits of unusual perceptual experiences, however, showed significant higher preference for this reading with an additive effect in discourse-contexts containing cues for specificity. This suggests that schizotypal traits might manifest themselves within language as a tendency to hold onto strong meaning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da ABRALIN\",\"volume\":\"264 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da ABRALIN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25189/rabralin.v21i1.2092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da ABRALIN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25189/rabralin.v21i1.2092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语义障碍被认为是分裂型人格障碍的语言标识。特别是,在建立名义表达参考方面的失败被认为是区分精神分裂症、高分裂型和对照组的主要因素,这些失败反映了使用语言语境线索的困难。我们的实验研究在非临床人群中调查了分裂型特征和对特定的单数名义表达的解释之间的协方差,这些表达指的是各种对象(一般阅读)或特定对象(特定阅读)。实验以巴西葡萄牙语进行,其中特定阅读是确定单数名词的强/默认意义,而一般阅读是弱意义,依赖于语境信息。结果表明,确定单数名词的解释与两种分裂型特征之间存在关联:情感收缩(消极特征)和不寻常的感知体验(积极特征)。一般来说,说话者倾向于给确定的单数名词赋予特定的解释。然而,那些具有较高的收缩情感测量值和较低的不寻常知觉体验特征的人,在包含特异性线索的话语语境中表现出明显更高的阅读偏好,并具有附加效应。这表明,分裂型特征可能在语言中表现为一种坚持强烈意义的倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Linguistic marker of schizotypy: a study on nominal reference
Semantic impairments are considered linguistic identifiers of schizotypal personality disorder. Particularly, failures in building reference of nominal expressions have been said to distinguish schizophrenia, high-schizotypy and control groups, and these failures reflect difficulties in using linguistic contextual cues. Our experimental study investigated covariances between schizotypal traits, in a nonclinical population, and interpretations of definite singular nominal expressions as referring either to kinds of objects (generic reading) or to specific objects (specific reading). The experiment was conducted in Brazilian Portuguese, where specific reading is the strong/default meaning of definite singular nominals, while generic reading is the weak meaning, being dependent on contextual information.  Results indicate associations between interpretation of definite singular nominals and two schizotypal traits: constricted affect (a negative trait) and unusual perceptual experiences (a positive trait). Speakers in general had preference for assigning specific interpretations to definite singular nominals. Those with higher measurements of constricted affect and lower traits of unusual perceptual experiences, however, showed significant higher preference for this reading with an additive effect in discourse-contexts containing cues for specificity. This suggests that schizotypal traits might manifest themselves within language as a tendency to hold onto strong meaning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信