痴呆患者在使用辅助技术时的知情同意问题

P. Novitzky, Cynthia Chen, A. Smeaton, R. Verbruggen, B. Gordijn
{"title":"痴呆患者在使用辅助技术时的知情同意问题","authors":"P. Novitzky, Cynthia Chen, A. Smeaton, R. Verbruggen, B. Gordijn","doi":"10.1093/med/9780190459802.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of assistive technologies (ATs) in the provision of healthcare promises to provide novel opportunities to protect, empower, and extend the autonomy of persons with dementia (PwDs). However, it also poses autonomy-related challenges, especially regarding informed consent. Traditional informed consent procedures, aimed at the protection of the autonomy of research participants and patients undergoing treatment, are not readily applicable to PwDs when it comes to deciding about ATs. This chapter analyzes the ethical challenges of obtaining informed consent from PwDs for research and development, and the use of ATs. The analysis reviews both traditional informed consent procedures and more innovative ones. The chapter will conclude with a list of recommendations, based on the findings of the ethical analysis.","PeriodicalId":334181,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent Assistive Technologies for Dementia","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Issues of Informed Consent from Persons with Dementia When Employing Assistive Technologies\",\"authors\":\"P. Novitzky, Cynthia Chen, A. Smeaton, R. Verbruggen, B. Gordijn\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/med/9780190459802.003.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of assistive technologies (ATs) in the provision of healthcare promises to provide novel opportunities to protect, empower, and extend the autonomy of persons with dementia (PwDs). However, it also poses autonomy-related challenges, especially regarding informed consent. Traditional informed consent procedures, aimed at the protection of the autonomy of research participants and patients undergoing treatment, are not readily applicable to PwDs when it comes to deciding about ATs. This chapter analyzes the ethical challenges of obtaining informed consent from PwDs for research and development, and the use of ATs. The analysis reviews both traditional informed consent procedures and more innovative ones. The chapter will conclude with a list of recommendations, based on the findings of the ethical analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligent Assistive Technologies for Dementia\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligent Assistive Technologies for Dementia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190459802.003.0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent Assistive Technologies for Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190459802.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在提供医疗保健时使用辅助技术有望为保护、增强和扩大痴呆症患者的自主性提供新的机会。然而,它也带来了与自主相关的挑战,特别是在知情同意方面。传统的知情同意程序旨在保护研究参与者和接受治疗的患者的自主权,但在决定是否接受治疗时,这一程序并不适用于残疾人士。本章分析取得残疾人士知情同意进行研究和发展,以及使用辅助药物的伦理挑战。该分析审查了传统的知情同意程序和更具创新性的程序。本章最后将根据伦理分析的结果列出一系列建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Issues of Informed Consent from Persons with Dementia When Employing Assistive Technologies
The use of assistive technologies (ATs) in the provision of healthcare promises to provide novel opportunities to protect, empower, and extend the autonomy of persons with dementia (PwDs). However, it also poses autonomy-related challenges, especially regarding informed consent. Traditional informed consent procedures, aimed at the protection of the autonomy of research participants and patients undergoing treatment, are not readily applicable to PwDs when it comes to deciding about ATs. This chapter analyzes the ethical challenges of obtaining informed consent from PwDs for research and development, and the use of ATs. The analysis reviews both traditional informed consent procedures and more innovative ones. The chapter will conclude with a list of recommendations, based on the findings of the ethical analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信