加强律师在收集和确认证据过程中的作用

M. Gafurov
{"title":"加强律师在收集和确认证据过程中的作用","authors":"M. Gafurov","doi":"10.51788/tsul.rols.2022.6.3./hhot8244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the role and importance of the defence counsel in proving criminal cases, the history of legislative acts and the opinion of scientists on the settlement of this issue, legal gaps in legislative acts, and problems of practice. In particular, the Criminal Procedural Code of the Uzbek SSR does not specify the right of the accused to defence. Only by the decision and consent of the prosecutor was the defence lawyer allowed to participate in the case from the moment the charges were brought. Under the conditions of independent Uzbekistan, the status of lawyers has been raised, but the laws do not create sufficient opportunities for the full protection of the rights of individuals. The law does not regulate the procedure for a lawyer to obtain data of evidentiary value, secure it and provide it to the investigating authority. In addition, there is no consensus on the issue of including a lawyer in a number of subjects for collecting evidence. Measures have not been taken to prevent cases of groundless refusal of a lawyer’s petition. Based on the analysis, substantiated proposals for the empowerment of a lawyer are presented.","PeriodicalId":102464,"journal":{"name":"Review of Law Sciences","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INCREASING THE ROLE OF THE LAWYER IN THE PROCESS OF COLLECTING AND CONFIRMING EVIDENCE\",\"authors\":\"M. Gafurov\",\"doi\":\"10.51788/tsul.rols.2022.6.3./hhot8244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes the role and importance of the defence counsel in proving criminal cases, the history of legislative acts and the opinion of scientists on the settlement of this issue, legal gaps in legislative acts, and problems of practice. In particular, the Criminal Procedural Code of the Uzbek SSR does not specify the right of the accused to defence. Only by the decision and consent of the prosecutor was the defence lawyer allowed to participate in the case from the moment the charges were brought. Under the conditions of independent Uzbekistan, the status of lawyers has been raised, but the laws do not create sufficient opportunities for the full protection of the rights of individuals. The law does not regulate the procedure for a lawyer to obtain data of evidentiary value, secure it and provide it to the investigating authority. In addition, there is no consensus on the issue of including a lawyer in a number of subjects for collecting evidence. Measures have not been taken to prevent cases of groundless refusal of a lawyer’s petition. Based on the analysis, substantiated proposals for the empowerment of a lawyer are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":102464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Law Sciences\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Law Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51788/tsul.rols.2022.6.3./hhot8244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Law Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51788/tsul.rols.2022.6.3./hhot8244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了辩护律师在刑事案件举证中的作用和重要性、立法行为的历史和学界对解决这一问题的看法、立法行为中的法律空白以及实践中存在的问题。特别是,乌兹别克斯坦社会主义共和国的《刑事诉讼法》没有具体规定被告的辩护权。只有在检察官的决定和同意下,辩护律师才被允许从提出指控的那一刻起参与案件。在独立的乌兹别克斯坦条件下,律师的地位得到了提高,但法律没有为充分保护个人权利创造充分的机会。法律没有规定律师获取、保管并向调查机关提供具有证据价值的资料的程序。此外,在一些收集证据的主体中是否包括律师的问题上也没有达成共识。没有采取措施防止无端拒绝律师申诉的案件。在此基础上,提出了律师赋权的具体建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
INCREASING THE ROLE OF THE LAWYER IN THE PROCESS OF COLLECTING AND CONFIRMING EVIDENCE
This article analyzes the role and importance of the defence counsel in proving criminal cases, the history of legislative acts and the opinion of scientists on the settlement of this issue, legal gaps in legislative acts, and problems of practice. In particular, the Criminal Procedural Code of the Uzbek SSR does not specify the right of the accused to defence. Only by the decision and consent of the prosecutor was the defence lawyer allowed to participate in the case from the moment the charges were brought. Under the conditions of independent Uzbekistan, the status of lawyers has been raised, but the laws do not create sufficient opportunities for the full protection of the rights of individuals. The law does not regulate the procedure for a lawyer to obtain data of evidentiary value, secure it and provide it to the investigating authority. In addition, there is no consensus on the issue of including a lawyer in a number of subjects for collecting evidence. Measures have not been taken to prevent cases of groundless refusal of a lawyer’s petition. Based on the analysis, substantiated proposals for the empowerment of a lawyer are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信