识别结构性故障

Robert C. Johansen
{"title":"识别结构性故障","authors":"Robert C. Johansen","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197586648.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines how traditional US policies and political realist assumptions have involved the United States in unnecessary wars and impeded lasting US security. Policymakers have ignored dangers inherent in the militarized balance-of-power system of relative anarchy, in unilateralism, and in narrowing nationalism. They are modernizing rather than reducing nuclear arsenals. They have been slow to address environmental protection. They have used attack drones repeatedly in violation of international law and US long-term interests. They reject US membership in the International Criminal Court. They have blocked opportunities to expand the role of international law, multilateral institutions, and global governance. These policies fail because they place too much faith in maximizing US military power when more effective rules to institutionalize peace and more support for global governance are needed to achieve sustainable security. By impeding multilateral lawmaking processes, US policies have brought repeated tragedies to the security commons.","PeriodicalId":264579,"journal":{"name":"Where the Evidence Leads","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recognizing Structural Breakdown\",\"authors\":\"Robert C. Johansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780197586648.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter examines how traditional US policies and political realist assumptions have involved the United States in unnecessary wars and impeded lasting US security. Policymakers have ignored dangers inherent in the militarized balance-of-power system of relative anarchy, in unilateralism, and in narrowing nationalism. They are modernizing rather than reducing nuclear arsenals. They have been slow to address environmental protection. They have used attack drones repeatedly in violation of international law and US long-term interests. They reject US membership in the International Criminal Court. They have blocked opportunities to expand the role of international law, multilateral institutions, and global governance. These policies fail because they place too much faith in maximizing US military power when more effective rules to institutionalize peace and more support for global governance are needed to achieve sustainable security. By impeding multilateral lawmaking processes, US policies have brought repeated tragedies to the security commons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":264579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Where the Evidence Leads\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Where the Evidence Leads\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197586648.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Where the Evidence Leads","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197586648.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章考察了美国的传统政策和政治现实主义假设是如何使美国卷入不必要的战争,并阻碍了美国的持久安全。政策制定者忽视了军事化的相对无政府状态的权力平衡体系、单边主义和狭隘的民族主义所固有的危险。他们正在现代化而不是削减核武库。他们在解决环境保护问题上行动迟缓。他们多次使用攻击型无人机,违反国际法和美国的长远利益。他们拒绝美国加入国际刑事法院。它们阻碍了扩大国际法、多边机构和全球治理作用的机会。这些政策之所以失败,是因为它们过于相信美国军事力量的最大化,而实现可持续安全需要更有效的规则将和平制度化,需要对全球治理提供更多支持。通过阻碍多边立法进程,美国的政策一再给安全公域带来悲剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recognizing Structural Breakdown
This chapter examines how traditional US policies and political realist assumptions have involved the United States in unnecessary wars and impeded lasting US security. Policymakers have ignored dangers inherent in the militarized balance-of-power system of relative anarchy, in unilateralism, and in narrowing nationalism. They are modernizing rather than reducing nuclear arsenals. They have been slow to address environmental protection. They have used attack drones repeatedly in violation of international law and US long-term interests. They reject US membership in the International Criminal Court. They have blocked opportunities to expand the role of international law, multilateral institutions, and global governance. These policies fail because they place too much faith in maximizing US military power when more effective rules to institutionalize peace and more support for global governance are needed to achieve sustainable security. By impeding multilateral lawmaking processes, US policies have brought repeated tragedies to the security commons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信