改进贫困衡量标准及其对英国学生进步的影响

S. Gorard, N. Siddiqui
{"title":"改进贫困衡量标准及其对英国学生进步的影响","authors":"S. Gorard, N. Siddiqui","doi":"10.5040/9781350033542.ch-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter presents the findings from an ESRC-funded secondary data initiative project. The authors are currently looking at different ways of estimating disadvantage in schools in England based on existing datasets, creating new variables to encompass individual ‘trajectories’ of disadvantage, and applying these to analyses of school intakes and outcomes. For example, we take a variable such as whether a pupil is eligible for free schools meals (FSM) in any year (or whether data is missing), and collate this for every year the pupil was in compulsory schooling. The results can be used to create new variables, such as how many years a child has been FSM-eligible, for the individual and for those they go to school with. We do the same thing with other background variables such as living or going to school in a deprived area, having a special educational need (SEN), having English as an additional language (EAL), and even ethnic classification. We are also linking our new records to other datasets such as the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England (LSYPE) to see how well our new trajectory variables match the richer data, such as parental occupation and income, in such smaller datasets. This chapter looks at improving measures of student poverty in education in order to see what light this casts on substantive issues, such as the purported underachievement of specific groups, schools and regions. It suggests that some policies are being misdirected, and that funding to improve results for poorer students is not being targeted efficiently.","PeriodicalId":400959,"journal":{"name":"Understanding School Segregation","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining Measures of Poverty and Their Impact on Student Progress in England\",\"authors\":\"S. Gorard, N. Siddiqui\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781350033542.ch-005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter presents the findings from an ESRC-funded secondary data initiative project. The authors are currently looking at different ways of estimating disadvantage in schools in England based on existing datasets, creating new variables to encompass individual ‘trajectories’ of disadvantage, and applying these to analyses of school intakes and outcomes. For example, we take a variable such as whether a pupil is eligible for free schools meals (FSM) in any year (or whether data is missing), and collate this for every year the pupil was in compulsory schooling. The results can be used to create new variables, such as how many years a child has been FSM-eligible, for the individual and for those they go to school with. We do the same thing with other background variables such as living or going to school in a deprived area, having a special educational need (SEN), having English as an additional language (EAL), and even ethnic classification. We are also linking our new records to other datasets such as the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England (LSYPE) to see how well our new trajectory variables match the richer data, such as parental occupation and income, in such smaller datasets. This chapter looks at improving measures of student poverty in education in order to see what light this casts on substantive issues, such as the purported underachievement of specific groups, schools and regions. It suggests that some policies are being misdirected, and that funding to improve results for poorer students is not being targeted efficiently.\",\"PeriodicalId\":400959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Understanding School Segregation\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Understanding School Segregation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350033542.ch-005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Understanding School Segregation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350033542.ch-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本章介绍了esrc资助的二级数据倡议项目的研究结果。作者目前正在研究基于现有数据集估计英国学校劣势的不同方法,创建新的变量来包含个人劣势的“轨迹”,并将这些变量应用于学校入学和结果的分析。例如,我们取一个变量,例如学生在任何一年是否有资格获得免费学校膳食(FSM)(或者是否缺少数据),并对学生在义务教育中的每一年进行整理。这些结果可以用来创造新的变量,比如一个孩子有多少年的fsm资格,对于个人和他们的同学来说都是如此。我们对其他背景变量也做了同样的事情,比如在贫困地区生活或上学,有特殊教育需求(SEN),英语作为附加语言(EAL),甚至种族分类。我们还将我们的新记录与其他数据集联系起来,如英国年轻人纵向研究(LSYPE),以查看我们的新轨迹变量与更丰富的数据(如父母职业和收入)在这些较小数据集中的匹配程度。本章着眼于改善教育中学生贫困的措施,以了解这对实质性问题的影响,例如特定群体,学校和地区的据称成绩不佳。它表明,一些政策被误导了,用于改善贫困学生成绩的资金没有得到有效的定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Refining Measures of Poverty and Their Impact on Student Progress in England
This chapter presents the findings from an ESRC-funded secondary data initiative project. The authors are currently looking at different ways of estimating disadvantage in schools in England based on existing datasets, creating new variables to encompass individual ‘trajectories’ of disadvantage, and applying these to analyses of school intakes and outcomes. For example, we take a variable such as whether a pupil is eligible for free schools meals (FSM) in any year (or whether data is missing), and collate this for every year the pupil was in compulsory schooling. The results can be used to create new variables, such as how many years a child has been FSM-eligible, for the individual and for those they go to school with. We do the same thing with other background variables such as living or going to school in a deprived area, having a special educational need (SEN), having English as an additional language (EAL), and even ethnic classification. We are also linking our new records to other datasets such as the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England (LSYPE) to see how well our new trajectory variables match the richer data, such as parental occupation and income, in such smaller datasets. This chapter looks at improving measures of student poverty in education in order to see what light this casts on substantive issues, such as the purported underachievement of specific groups, schools and regions. It suggests that some policies are being misdirected, and that funding to improve results for poorer students is not being targeted efficiently.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信