河流州本科生对化学实验室安全标志的认识

{"title":"河流州本科生对化学实验室安全标志的认识","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jcerp.05.01.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chemistry laboratory instructions do not only provide students with practical experiences but also teaches students on hazardous materials/chemicals as well as laboratory safety signs so as to prevent or minimize harm in the laboratory. Consequently, the purpose of this research study was to investigate Rivers undergraduate students’ awareness level of safety signs in Chemistry laboratory. To this end, three research questions and two hypotheses guided the study. The study adopted analytic descriptive survey design. A total of 60 year three undergraduate students studying Chemistry Education (B.Sc. Ed) and Pure Chemistry (B.Sc.) were randomly drawn from three universities namely; University of Port Harcourt (Uniport), Rivers State University (RSU) and Ignatius Ajuru University of Education (IAUE) with each university contributing 20 students. A well validated and researchers constructed test instrument, titled, Chemistry Laboratory Test on Safety Signs (CLTSS) which had an internal reliability index of 0.94 via Cronbach Alpha was used for data collection in the study. The relevant data collected were subjected to simple percentages, mean, standard deviation, t-test and analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA) as statistical tools. The results of the study revealed that majority of the students misunderstood the definition of chemical hazards. In addition, they experienced confusion in matching chemicals commonly found in Chemistry laboratory (i.e., sodium hydroxide) and the meaning of chemical safety sign. An indication that students’ awareness level of safety signs is low. A second finding of the study showed that there is a difference in the awareness level of safety signs between Chemistry Education (B.Sc. Ed) students and their pure Chemistry (B.Sc.) counterpart, however, the difference was not significant statistically. Also, the finding showed that the awareness levels of safety signs among undergraduate Chemistry students are not significantly dependent on institutional types. Based on the findings of the study and the fact that the findings from this study provide basic information for teaching and learning, it was recommended among others that, lecturers in the course of teaching should promote students’ awareness of the proper handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials/chemicals vis-à-vis their safety signs.","PeriodicalId":262953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemistry: Education Research and Practice","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemistry Laboratory Safety Signs Awareness Among Undergraduate Students in Rivers State\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/jcerp.05.01.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chemistry laboratory instructions do not only provide students with practical experiences but also teaches students on hazardous materials/chemicals as well as laboratory safety signs so as to prevent or minimize harm in the laboratory. Consequently, the purpose of this research study was to investigate Rivers undergraduate students’ awareness level of safety signs in Chemistry laboratory. To this end, three research questions and two hypotheses guided the study. The study adopted analytic descriptive survey design. A total of 60 year three undergraduate students studying Chemistry Education (B.Sc. Ed) and Pure Chemistry (B.Sc.) were randomly drawn from three universities namely; University of Port Harcourt (Uniport), Rivers State University (RSU) and Ignatius Ajuru University of Education (IAUE) with each university contributing 20 students. A well validated and researchers constructed test instrument, titled, Chemistry Laboratory Test on Safety Signs (CLTSS) which had an internal reliability index of 0.94 via Cronbach Alpha was used for data collection in the study. The relevant data collected were subjected to simple percentages, mean, standard deviation, t-test and analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA) as statistical tools. The results of the study revealed that majority of the students misunderstood the definition of chemical hazards. In addition, they experienced confusion in matching chemicals commonly found in Chemistry laboratory (i.e., sodium hydroxide) and the meaning of chemical safety sign. An indication that students’ awareness level of safety signs is low. A second finding of the study showed that there is a difference in the awareness level of safety signs between Chemistry Education (B.Sc. Ed) students and their pure Chemistry (B.Sc.) counterpart, however, the difference was not significant statistically. Also, the finding showed that the awareness levels of safety signs among undergraduate Chemistry students are not significantly dependent on institutional types. Based on the findings of the study and the fact that the findings from this study provide basic information for teaching and learning, it was recommended among others that, lecturers in the course of teaching should promote students’ awareness of the proper handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials/chemicals vis-à-vis their safety signs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemistry: Education Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemistry: Education Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/jcerp.05.01.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemistry: Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jcerp.05.01.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

化学实验说明书不仅为学生提供实践经验,而且还向学生讲授有害物质/化学品以及实验室安全标志,以防止或尽量减少实验室的危害。因此,本研究的目的是调查河流大学本科生对化学实验室安全标志的认知程度。为此,本研究以三个研究问题和两个假设为指导。本研究采用分析描述性调查设计。从三所大学随机抽取60名化学教育(B.Sc. Ed)和纯化学(B.Sc.)专业的三年级本科生,分别是;哈科特港大学(Uniport),河流州立大学(RSU)和伊格内修斯·阿朱鲁教育大学(IAUE),每所大学贡献20名学生。本研究的数据收集使用了一种经过验证并由研究者自行构建的测试仪器,名为化学实验室安全标志测试(CLTSS),其内部信度指数为Cronbach Alpha,为0.94。收集到的相关数据采用简单百分比、均值、标准差、t检验和方差分析(One-way ANOVA)作为统计工具。研究结果显示,大部分学生误解了化学危害的定义。此外,他们在化学实验室中常见的化学物质(即氢氧化钠)的匹配和化学安全标志的含义方面遇到了困惑。这表明学生对安全标志的认识水平较低。本研究的第二项发现显示,化学教育(B.Sc. Ed)学生与纯化学(B.Sc.)学生对安全标志的认知程度存在差异,但差异不显著。此外,本研究发现化学系本科学生对安全标志的认知程度,在院校类型上并无显著差异。基于本研究的结果,以及本研究的结果为教学提供了基本的信息,建议教师在教学过程中应提高学生对危险物质/化学品的正确处理,储存和处置的意识,以-à-vis其安全标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chemistry Laboratory Safety Signs Awareness Among Undergraduate Students in Rivers State
Chemistry laboratory instructions do not only provide students with practical experiences but also teaches students on hazardous materials/chemicals as well as laboratory safety signs so as to prevent or minimize harm in the laboratory. Consequently, the purpose of this research study was to investigate Rivers undergraduate students’ awareness level of safety signs in Chemistry laboratory. To this end, three research questions and two hypotheses guided the study. The study adopted analytic descriptive survey design. A total of 60 year three undergraduate students studying Chemistry Education (B.Sc. Ed) and Pure Chemistry (B.Sc.) were randomly drawn from three universities namely; University of Port Harcourt (Uniport), Rivers State University (RSU) and Ignatius Ajuru University of Education (IAUE) with each university contributing 20 students. A well validated and researchers constructed test instrument, titled, Chemistry Laboratory Test on Safety Signs (CLTSS) which had an internal reliability index of 0.94 via Cronbach Alpha was used for data collection in the study. The relevant data collected were subjected to simple percentages, mean, standard deviation, t-test and analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA) as statistical tools. The results of the study revealed that majority of the students misunderstood the definition of chemical hazards. In addition, they experienced confusion in matching chemicals commonly found in Chemistry laboratory (i.e., sodium hydroxide) and the meaning of chemical safety sign. An indication that students’ awareness level of safety signs is low. A second finding of the study showed that there is a difference in the awareness level of safety signs between Chemistry Education (B.Sc. Ed) students and their pure Chemistry (B.Sc.) counterpart, however, the difference was not significant statistically. Also, the finding showed that the awareness levels of safety signs among undergraduate Chemistry students are not significantly dependent on institutional types. Based on the findings of the study and the fact that the findings from this study provide basic information for teaching and learning, it was recommended among others that, lecturers in the course of teaching should promote students’ awareness of the proper handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials/chemicals vis-à-vis their safety signs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信