概念框架在定性研究中的地位

Marc-André Éthier
{"title":"概念框架在定性研究中的地位","authors":"Marc-André Éthier","doi":"10.7202/1085576ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Qualitative research has often been criticized for its methodological slip\ntowards positivism and especially for its neglect of the dynamic relation\nbetween the themes it develops. This article aims at suggesting a\nqualitative method capable of addressing these difficulties. The authors\nsuggest that Plan Analysis (Caspar, 1995, 1997) is a valid and feasible\nmethod to highlight the dynamic links between the themes that emerge\nusing traditional theme analysis. The use of Plan Analysis is illustrated\nusing a study on the motivation for treatment in pedophile sex abusers.","PeriodicalId":264196,"journal":{"name":"Recherches qualitatives","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Du statut d’un cadre conceptuel dans une\\nrecherche qualitative\",\"authors\":\"Marc-André Éthier\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1085576ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Qualitative research has often been criticized for its methodological slip\\ntowards positivism and especially for its neglect of the dynamic relation\\nbetween the themes it develops. This article aims at suggesting a\\nqualitative method capable of addressing these difficulties. The authors\\nsuggest that Plan Analysis (Caspar, 1995, 1997) is a valid and feasible\\nmethod to highlight the dynamic links between the themes that emerge\\nusing traditional theme analysis. The use of Plan Analysis is illustrated\\nusing a study on the motivation for treatment in pedophile sex abusers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":264196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recherches qualitatives\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recherches qualitatives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1085576ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherches qualitatives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1085576ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

质性研究经常因其方法论上的实证主义倾向而受到批评,特别是因为它忽视了它所发展的主题之间的动态关系。本文旨在提出一种能够解决这些困难的定性方法。作者认为,计划分析(Caspar, 1995,1997)是一种有效和可行的方法,可以突出传统主题分析中出现的主题之间的动态联系。计划分析的使用是通过对恋童癖性虐待者治疗动机的研究来说明的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Du statut d’un cadre conceptuel dans une recherche qualitative
Qualitative research has often been criticized for its methodological slip towards positivism and especially for its neglect of the dynamic relation between the themes it develops. This article aims at suggesting a qualitative method capable of addressing these difficulties. The authors suggest that Plan Analysis (Caspar, 1995, 1997) is a valid and feasible method to highlight the dynamic links between the themes that emerge using traditional theme analysis. The use of Plan Analysis is illustrated using a study on the motivation for treatment in pedophile sex abusers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信