{"title":"在布尔框架中,除了亚里士多德的思想,扎德的思想还有足够的空间","authors":"D. Radojevic","doi":"10.1109/SOFA.2007.4318309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even if there is enough room for Zadeh's ideas, besides Aristotle's in a Boolean frame, none algebra of conventional fuzzy approaches is Boolean. The goal of this paper is to show that a Boolean frame (defined by Boolean axioms and theorems) is equally adequate a place for realization of fuzzy theory (fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, fuzzy relations etc.) as it is for realization of known classical two-valued theories (classical sets, classical logic, classical relations etc).","PeriodicalId":205589,"journal":{"name":"2007 2nd International Workshop on Soft Computing Applications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"There is Enough Room for Zadeh's Ideas, Besides Aristotle's in a Boolean Frame\",\"authors\":\"D. Radojevic\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SOFA.2007.4318309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Even if there is enough room for Zadeh's ideas, besides Aristotle's in a Boolean frame, none algebra of conventional fuzzy approaches is Boolean. The goal of this paper is to show that a Boolean frame (defined by Boolean axioms and theorems) is equally adequate a place for realization of fuzzy theory (fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, fuzzy relations etc.) as it is for realization of known classical two-valued theories (classical sets, classical logic, classical relations etc).\",\"PeriodicalId\":205589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 2nd International Workshop on Soft Computing Applications\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 2nd International Workshop on Soft Computing Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOFA.2007.4318309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 2nd International Workshop on Soft Computing Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOFA.2007.4318309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
There is Enough Room for Zadeh's Ideas, Besides Aristotle's in a Boolean Frame
Even if there is enough room for Zadeh's ideas, besides Aristotle's in a Boolean frame, none algebra of conventional fuzzy approaches is Boolean. The goal of this paper is to show that a Boolean frame (defined by Boolean axioms and theorems) is equally adequate a place for realization of fuzzy theory (fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, fuzzy relations etc.) as it is for realization of known classical two-valued theories (classical sets, classical logic, classical relations etc).