Prasījumu tiesību cesijas izpratne un ar to saistītā problemātika

In this article, the author analyses a number of issues related to the understanding of cession of the right to claim. Firstly, the author analyses the prevailing view in Latvian legal doctrine and case law that cession transfers only the cedents’ rights to cessionary, but not the cedents’ obligations, in which respect the author provides a critique of this approach. Secondly, the author discusses the question of the permissibility of cession of non-monetary claims, noting that typically in practice cession serves monetary claims. Thirdly, the author addresses the issue of the legal consequences in cases where a contractual prohibition on assignment is breached or where the cedent alienates the same claim more than once. Fourthly, as the final issue in this article, the author explores the aspect of assignment of accessory claims.