传统媒体与社交媒体:挑战与机遇

Marwan Walid Mohammad Al-Quran
{"title":"传统媒体与社交媒体:挑战与机遇","authors":"Marwan Walid Mohammad Al-Quran","doi":"10.47577/technium.v4i10.8012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current research study aimed to frame the ongoing and growing debate in the academic field about the overlapping relationship between traditional media and social media outlets. Particularly, the study sought to present an in-depth and inclusive discussion about the traditional media and social media, focusing on the challenges and opportunities of each type. It is worth mentioning that the present study adopted the Semi-Systematic Review Approach through which the findings of a sample of studies that are consistent and similar to the current study’s topic have been identified, selected, assessed, synthesized and summarized in an explicit and planned manner which eventually led to allow the researcher to make inferences based on analyzing the resulting summary indicated in advance. The findings of the data analysis demonstrated that the traditional media and the social media have their pros and cons. Additionally, there are major differences between the two types, including: while traditional media generally offers a wider audience pool, social media allows for more targeted distribution; social media is immediate, while traditional can be delayed due to press times; traditional media pieces are more final, where social media is dynamic; social media offers more control over the message than traditional media; social media is a two-way conversation, and traditional is one-way, i.e., with social media, the public has the opportunity to voice their opinions. Furthermore, the findings of the study revealed that although social media has become the most convenient and prevalent communication channel with the ability to reach a broader audience, and although the rise of new media, particularly social media, has put a danger to the survival of some traditional media outlets and reduced their readership and viewership, however traditional media, which is no longer as dominant as it once was, is still a relevant source of information for society and a wide audience who are looking for the credibility and reliability of the news that is circulated on social media. Finally, the study concluded that despite the fact that traditional media and social media both have their pros and cons, however the relationship between them is still a relationship of integration, not a relationship of exclusion or cancellation. Thus, instead of being pitted against one another, traditional and social media outlets can go hand-in-hand through developing a successful integration, a complementary relationship, and a sustainable sharing processes between the traditional media and the social media outlets in a collaborative, cohesive, and in an ethical manner, as such integration would enhance their roles and services, provide added values than ever, and enable them to reach the widest amount of people at an effective frequency and deliver –in record time and without interference- an easily accessible content that is more interesting and present such content in an attractive way which responds to the targeted audience’s requests and meet their expectations.","PeriodicalId":388226,"journal":{"name":"Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology","volume":"178 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traditional media versus social media: challenges and opportunities\",\"authors\":\"Marwan Walid Mohammad Al-Quran\",\"doi\":\"10.47577/technium.v4i10.8012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current research study aimed to frame the ongoing and growing debate in the academic field about the overlapping relationship between traditional media and social media outlets. Particularly, the study sought to present an in-depth and inclusive discussion about the traditional media and social media, focusing on the challenges and opportunities of each type. It is worth mentioning that the present study adopted the Semi-Systematic Review Approach through which the findings of a sample of studies that are consistent and similar to the current study’s topic have been identified, selected, assessed, synthesized and summarized in an explicit and planned manner which eventually led to allow the researcher to make inferences based on analyzing the resulting summary indicated in advance. The findings of the data analysis demonstrated that the traditional media and the social media have their pros and cons. Additionally, there are major differences between the two types, including: while traditional media generally offers a wider audience pool, social media allows for more targeted distribution; social media is immediate, while traditional can be delayed due to press times; traditional media pieces are more final, where social media is dynamic; social media offers more control over the message than traditional media; social media is a two-way conversation, and traditional is one-way, i.e., with social media, the public has the opportunity to voice their opinions. Furthermore, the findings of the study revealed that although social media has become the most convenient and prevalent communication channel with the ability to reach a broader audience, and although the rise of new media, particularly social media, has put a danger to the survival of some traditional media outlets and reduced their readership and viewership, however traditional media, which is no longer as dominant as it once was, is still a relevant source of information for society and a wide audience who are looking for the credibility and reliability of the news that is circulated on social media. Finally, the study concluded that despite the fact that traditional media and social media both have their pros and cons, however the relationship between them is still a relationship of integration, not a relationship of exclusion or cancellation. Thus, instead of being pitted against one another, traditional and social media outlets can go hand-in-hand through developing a successful integration, a complementary relationship, and a sustainable sharing processes between the traditional media and the social media outlets in a collaborative, cohesive, and in an ethical manner, as such integration would enhance their roles and services, provide added values than ever, and enable them to reach the widest amount of people at an effective frequency and deliver –in record time and without interference- an easily accessible content that is more interesting and present such content in an attractive way which responds to the targeted audience’s requests and meet their expectations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology\",\"volume\":\"178 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v4i10.8012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v4i10.8012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目前的研究旨在构建学术界正在进行和日益激烈的关于传统媒体和社交媒体之间重叠关系的辩论。特别是,该研究试图对传统媒体和社交媒体进行深入和包容的讨论,重点关注每种类型的挑战和机遇。值得一提的是,本研究采用了半系统综述方法,通过这种方法,以明确和有计划的方式识别,选择,评估,综合和总结与当前研究主题一致的研究样本的发现,最终导致研究者能够根据事先指出的结果总结进行推断。数据分析的结果表明,传统媒体和社交媒体各有利弊。此外,两种类型之间存在主要差异,包括:传统媒体通常提供更广泛的受众群,社交媒体允许更有针对性的分发;社交媒体是即时的,而传统媒体可能会因媒体时间而延迟;传统媒体更具决定性,社交媒体是动态的;与传统媒体相比,社交媒体提供了对信息更多的控制;社交媒体是双向的对话,传统是单向的,也就是说,有了社交媒体,公众有机会表达自己的意见。此外,研究结果显示,尽管社交媒体已经成为最方便、最流行的沟通渠道,能够接触到更广泛的受众,尽管新媒体,特别是社交媒体的兴起,对一些传统媒体的生存构成了威胁,并减少了它们的读者和收视率,然而,传统媒体不再像以前那样占据主导地位,仍然是社会和广大受众的相关信息来源,他们正在寻找在社交媒体上传播的新闻的可信度和可靠性。最后,研究得出结论,尽管传统媒体和社交媒体各有利弊,但它们之间的关系仍然是一种融合关系,而不是一种排斥或取消的关系。因此,传统媒体和社交媒体可以携手并进,在传统媒体和社交媒体之间以协作、凝聚力和道德的方式发展成功的整合、互补关系和可持续的共享过程,而不是相互对立,因为这种整合将增强它们的作用和服务,提供比以往任何时候都多的附加价值。并使他们能够以有效的频率接触到最广泛的人群,并在创纪录的时间和无干扰的情况下提供更有趣的易于访问的内容,并以有吸引力的方式呈现这些内容,以响应目标受众的要求并满足他们的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Traditional media versus social media: challenges and opportunities
The current research study aimed to frame the ongoing and growing debate in the academic field about the overlapping relationship between traditional media and social media outlets. Particularly, the study sought to present an in-depth and inclusive discussion about the traditional media and social media, focusing on the challenges and opportunities of each type. It is worth mentioning that the present study adopted the Semi-Systematic Review Approach through which the findings of a sample of studies that are consistent and similar to the current study’s topic have been identified, selected, assessed, synthesized and summarized in an explicit and planned manner which eventually led to allow the researcher to make inferences based on analyzing the resulting summary indicated in advance. The findings of the data analysis demonstrated that the traditional media and the social media have their pros and cons. Additionally, there are major differences between the two types, including: while traditional media generally offers a wider audience pool, social media allows for more targeted distribution; social media is immediate, while traditional can be delayed due to press times; traditional media pieces are more final, where social media is dynamic; social media offers more control over the message than traditional media; social media is a two-way conversation, and traditional is one-way, i.e., with social media, the public has the opportunity to voice their opinions. Furthermore, the findings of the study revealed that although social media has become the most convenient and prevalent communication channel with the ability to reach a broader audience, and although the rise of new media, particularly social media, has put a danger to the survival of some traditional media outlets and reduced their readership and viewership, however traditional media, which is no longer as dominant as it once was, is still a relevant source of information for society and a wide audience who are looking for the credibility and reliability of the news that is circulated on social media. Finally, the study concluded that despite the fact that traditional media and social media both have their pros and cons, however the relationship between them is still a relationship of integration, not a relationship of exclusion or cancellation. Thus, instead of being pitted against one another, traditional and social media outlets can go hand-in-hand through developing a successful integration, a complementary relationship, and a sustainable sharing processes between the traditional media and the social media outlets in a collaborative, cohesive, and in an ethical manner, as such integration would enhance their roles and services, provide added values than ever, and enable them to reach the widest amount of people at an effective frequency and deliver –in record time and without interference- an easily accessible content that is more interesting and present such content in an attractive way which responds to the targeted audience’s requests and meet their expectations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信