“SC *变化!:星号在打印不可打印的辱骂词

D.M. Sudnik
{"title":"“SC *变化!:星号在打印不可打印的辱骂词","authors":"D.M. Sudnik","doi":"10.35634/2412-9534-2022-32-5-1099-1103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article raises the question of the reasonability of replacing the vowel with an asterisk in the terms of offense in the media and communication. The actual example from the Internet global computer network shows a true role of the asterisk* in print. It has been argued that such substitution may have even more harmful effect on the reader, than an unchanged swear word. Other means of graphical euphemization of obscene word forms are considered as well, e.g., @, #, $ symbols instead of one of the letters of a swear word. QWERTY-effect is discussed in relation to Russian and foreign swear words. The following questions are raised: which symbols are used for euphemization of printed abusive words, how is the choice made and which symbols are completely inappropriate for this? A mean for complete masking of obscene words using a mark [censored] is suggested.","PeriodicalId":343725,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series History and Philology","volume":"11655 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“SC*RY!”: ASTERISK IN PRINTED UNPRINTABLE ABUSIVE WORDS\",\"authors\":\"D.M. Sudnik\",\"doi\":\"10.35634/2412-9534-2022-32-5-1099-1103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article raises the question of the reasonability of replacing the vowel with an asterisk in the terms of offense in the media and communication. The actual example from the Internet global computer network shows a true role of the asterisk* in print. It has been argued that such substitution may have even more harmful effect on the reader, than an unchanged swear word. Other means of graphical euphemization of obscene word forms are considered as well, e.g., @, #, $ symbols instead of one of the letters of a swear word. QWERTY-effect is discussed in relation to Russian and foreign swear words. The following questions are raised: which symbols are used for euphemization of printed abusive words, how is the choice made and which symbols are completely inappropriate for this? A mean for complete masking of obscene words using a mark [censored] is suggested.\",\"PeriodicalId\":343725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series History and Philology\",\"volume\":\"11655 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series History and Philology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9534-2022-32-5-1099-1103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series History and Philology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9534-2022-32-5-1099-1103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章提出了在媒介传播中以星号代替元音的合理性问题。来自Internet全球计算机网络的实际示例显示了星号*在打印中的真实作用。有人认为,这种替代可能比不变的粗口对读者造成更有害的影响。此外,还考虑了淫秽词语形式的其他图形委婉化方式,例如,用@、#、$符号代替脏话中的一个字母。讨论了俄语和外语粗口的qwerty效应。提出了以下问题:哪些符号被用于委婉化印刷的辱骂词,如何选择,哪些符号完全不适合这样做?建议使用标记[删节]完全掩盖淫秽文字的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“SC*RY!”: ASTERISK IN PRINTED UNPRINTABLE ABUSIVE WORDS
The article raises the question of the reasonability of replacing the vowel with an asterisk in the terms of offense in the media and communication. The actual example from the Internet global computer network shows a true role of the asterisk* in print. It has been argued that such substitution may have even more harmful effect on the reader, than an unchanged swear word. Other means of graphical euphemization of obscene word forms are considered as well, e.g., @, #, $ symbols instead of one of the letters of a swear word. QWERTY-effect is discussed in relation to Russian and foreign swear words. The following questions are raised: which symbols are used for euphemization of printed abusive words, how is the choice made and which symbols are completely inappropriate for this? A mean for complete masking of obscene words using a mark [censored] is suggested.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信