问题在于不平等,而不是私有财产和市场

J. Wisman
{"title":"问题在于不平等,而不是私有财产和市场","authors":"J. Wisman","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197575949.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Capitalism has always had vociferous critics, none of whom was more insightful than Marx. He recognized that although capitalism produced unprecedented wealth, behind its ideological patina of freedom, it was an exploitative social system wherein capitalists extracted workers’ surplus. Marx and other critics also held capitalism’s institutions of private property and markets to be corrupting. This has been a mistake. The problem is not these institutions but the inequality that co-evolved with them, providing elites with the political power to structure private property and markets to exploit producers. Marx believed that capitalism’s evolution would eventually empower producers to take political power, and that they would abandon these institutions. But these institutions are essential for economic dynamism and freedom. Blaming capitalism’s institutions of private property and markets for the injustices and social irrationality that accompanied them is a mistake that hinders evolution of a non-exploitative future that makes use of them.","PeriodicalId":408391,"journal":{"name":"The Origins and Dynamics of Inequality","volume":"177 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Problem Is Inequality, Not Private Property and Markets\",\"authors\":\"J. Wisman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780197575949.003.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Capitalism has always had vociferous critics, none of whom was more insightful than Marx. He recognized that although capitalism produced unprecedented wealth, behind its ideological patina of freedom, it was an exploitative social system wherein capitalists extracted workers’ surplus. Marx and other critics also held capitalism’s institutions of private property and markets to be corrupting. This has been a mistake. The problem is not these institutions but the inequality that co-evolved with them, providing elites with the political power to structure private property and markets to exploit producers. Marx believed that capitalism’s evolution would eventually empower producers to take political power, and that they would abandon these institutions. But these institutions are essential for economic dynamism and freedom. Blaming capitalism’s institutions of private property and markets for the injustices and social irrationality that accompanied them is a mistake that hinders evolution of a non-exploitative future that makes use of them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Origins and Dynamics of Inequality\",\"volume\":\"177 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Origins and Dynamics of Inequality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197575949.003.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Origins and Dynamics of Inequality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197575949.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

资本主义一直有激烈的批评者,没有人比马克思更有洞察力。他认识到,尽管资本主义创造了前所未有的财富,但在自由的意识形态背后,这是一种剥削性的社会制度,资本家榨取工人的剩余。马克思和其他批评家也认为资本主义的私有财产和市场制度是腐败的。这是一个错误。问题不在于这些制度,而在于与之共同进化的不平等,这种不平等为精英提供了政治权力,以构建私有财产和市场来剥削生产者。马克思认为,资本主义的进化最终会使生产者获得政治权力,他们会放弃这些制度。但这些制度对经济活力和自由至关重要。将伴随而来的不公正和社会不合理归咎于资本主义的私有财产和市场制度是一个错误,它阻碍了利用它们的非剥削性未来的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Problem Is Inequality, Not Private Property and Markets
Capitalism has always had vociferous critics, none of whom was more insightful than Marx. He recognized that although capitalism produced unprecedented wealth, behind its ideological patina of freedom, it was an exploitative social system wherein capitalists extracted workers’ surplus. Marx and other critics also held capitalism’s institutions of private property and markets to be corrupting. This has been a mistake. The problem is not these institutions but the inequality that co-evolved with them, providing elites with the political power to structure private property and markets to exploit producers. Marx believed that capitalism’s evolution would eventually empower producers to take political power, and that they would abandon these institutions. But these institutions are essential for economic dynamism and freedom. Blaming capitalism’s institutions of private property and markets for the injustices and social irrationality that accompanied them is a mistake that hinders evolution of a non-exploitative future that makes use of them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信