基于证据的实践的驱动因素:对中低收入国家的影响

Odunayo Kolawole Omolade
{"title":"基于证据的实践的驱动因素:对中低收入国家的影响","authors":"Odunayo Kolawole Omolade","doi":"10.53964/jmnpr.2023012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low- and medium-income countries (LMICs) desire the multiple benefits of evidence-based practice (EBP) but have achieved minimal success so far. Moreover, frameworks for implementing EBP fail to acknowledge the external socio-political factors as core component of uptake and sustaining EBP in health care settings. Consequently, this paper will examine the influence of drivers of EBP and the implications for sustaining EBP diffusion into LMICs. Theoretically, EBP proposes that clinical treatment decisions be based on the most current verifiable evidence. Associated with improved quality of care, EBP is the universal standard of clinical interventions. Yet, since introducing EBP to LMICs, the integration process has been slow compared to the rapid development witnessed in the UK, US and Canada over the past 30 years. EBP proponents linked the resistance with institutional barriers in the LMICs. However, this paper argues that the external socio-political context is a proven barrier-breaking force but presently underestimated in LMICs. Central to this review, the socio-political dynamics in the UK, US and Canada were discussed to mirror the powerful influence that propelled EBP at its successful inception. The implication is that breaking the institutional barriers against sustainable EBP implementation in the LMICs requires synergy of influential forces outside the hospital settings. Unfortunately, most implementation studies from LMICs are limited to institutional barriers. Finally, hospital settings in LMICs face unique problems integrating EBP with daily care and to overcome the barriers, closer attention must be paid to the influence of the surrounding factors; political, technological, managerial and globalization forces.","PeriodicalId":200312,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Nursing Practice and Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Drivers of Evidence-based Practice at Inception: Implications for Low- and Medium-income Countries\",\"authors\":\"Odunayo Kolawole Omolade\",\"doi\":\"10.53964/jmnpr.2023012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Low- and medium-income countries (LMICs) desire the multiple benefits of evidence-based practice (EBP) but have achieved minimal success so far. Moreover, frameworks for implementing EBP fail to acknowledge the external socio-political factors as core component of uptake and sustaining EBP in health care settings. Consequently, this paper will examine the influence of drivers of EBP and the implications for sustaining EBP diffusion into LMICs. Theoretically, EBP proposes that clinical treatment decisions be based on the most current verifiable evidence. Associated with improved quality of care, EBP is the universal standard of clinical interventions. Yet, since introducing EBP to LMICs, the integration process has been slow compared to the rapid development witnessed in the UK, US and Canada over the past 30 years. EBP proponents linked the resistance with institutional barriers in the LMICs. However, this paper argues that the external socio-political context is a proven barrier-breaking force but presently underestimated in LMICs. Central to this review, the socio-political dynamics in the UK, US and Canada were discussed to mirror the powerful influence that propelled EBP at its successful inception. The implication is that breaking the institutional barriers against sustainable EBP implementation in the LMICs requires synergy of influential forces outside the hospital settings. Unfortunately, most implementation studies from LMICs are limited to institutional barriers. Finally, hospital settings in LMICs face unique problems integrating EBP with daily care and to overcome the barriers, closer attention must be paid to the influence of the surrounding factors; political, technological, managerial and globalization forces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":200312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern Nursing Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern Nursing Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53964/jmnpr.2023012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Nursing Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53964/jmnpr.2023012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)希望获得循证实践(EBP)的多重好处,但迄今为止取得的成功微乎其微。此外,实施EBP的框架未能承认外部社会政治因素是在卫生保健环境中吸收和维持EBP的核心组成部分。因此,本文将研究EBP驱动因素的影响以及维持EBP向中低收入国家扩散的意义。理论上,EBP建议临床治疗决策应基于最新的可验证证据。与提高护理质量相关,EBP是临床干预的普遍标准。然而,自从将EBP引入中低收入国家以来,与英国、美国和加拿大过去30年的快速发展相比,整合过程一直缓慢。EBP的支持者将这种阻力与中低收入国家的制度障碍联系起来。然而,本文认为,外部社会政治背景是一种已被证明的打破障碍的力量,但目前在中低收入国家被低估了。本次审查的核心是讨论了英国、美国和加拿大的社会政治动态,以反映推动EBP成功启动的强大影响力。这意味着,要打破阻碍中低收入国家可持续实施EBP的体制障碍,需要医院环境之外有影响力的力量协同作用。不幸的是,大多数来自中低收入国家的实施研究都局限于制度障碍。最后,中低收入国家的医院环境在整合EBP与日常护理方面面临着独特的问题,要克服这些障碍,必须更加关注周围因素的影响;政治、技术、管理和全球化力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Drivers of Evidence-based Practice at Inception: Implications for Low- and Medium-income Countries
Low- and medium-income countries (LMICs) desire the multiple benefits of evidence-based practice (EBP) but have achieved minimal success so far. Moreover, frameworks for implementing EBP fail to acknowledge the external socio-political factors as core component of uptake and sustaining EBP in health care settings. Consequently, this paper will examine the influence of drivers of EBP and the implications for sustaining EBP diffusion into LMICs. Theoretically, EBP proposes that clinical treatment decisions be based on the most current verifiable evidence. Associated with improved quality of care, EBP is the universal standard of clinical interventions. Yet, since introducing EBP to LMICs, the integration process has been slow compared to the rapid development witnessed in the UK, US and Canada over the past 30 years. EBP proponents linked the resistance with institutional barriers in the LMICs. However, this paper argues that the external socio-political context is a proven barrier-breaking force but presently underestimated in LMICs. Central to this review, the socio-political dynamics in the UK, US and Canada were discussed to mirror the powerful influence that propelled EBP at its successful inception. The implication is that breaking the institutional barriers against sustainable EBP implementation in the LMICs requires synergy of influential forces outside the hospital settings. Unfortunately, most implementation studies from LMICs are limited to institutional barriers. Finally, hospital settings in LMICs face unique problems integrating EBP with daily care and to overcome the barriers, closer attention must be paid to the influence of the surrounding factors; political, technological, managerial and globalization forces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信