聚落制度的规制是西伯利亚乡村建筑的主要因素

E.N. Lihachov
{"title":"聚落制度的规制是西伯利亚乡村建筑的主要因素","authors":"E.N. Lihachov","doi":"10.1109/KORUS.1999.875887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Before the period of “reconstruction” the base of the scientific conception of the planning reorganization of the settlings in Siberia was the development of the network of settlements as the indivisible system of settling. This process gave the possibility to solve the problem of overcoming the differences between the city and the village; reduced the grouth of large cities and developed the small and middle-sizen ones. Moreover, the development of small towns, as the centres of rural districts, was one of the main tasks in improvement of territorial production organization. In the 1980-s the cultural relations between small and large towns, villages and towns has considerably increased. The production ties strengthened. The territorial-production and agroindustrial complexes and societies were formed. The concentration of production was carried out on the base of combination and specialization. The interfamily ties in the socio-cultural sphere were developing. The integration of towns and villages into a town-building formation on a regional scale was carried out the system of settling in Siberia. The following economic and social problems were planned: the use of natural resources of the territory, the development of the agrarian production and its transference on the industrial basis, the equalization of the living standards of the rural and city dwellers, the development of transport communication. All in all, during the 197080-s, the number of city dwellers were increasing by 2-2,5 % annually, but the number of rural dwellers were decreasing by 1-3 %. The greatest concentration of the inhabitants were marked in the large cities (about 50 Yo of the country’s population). Most of the rural settlements were reorganized into the town settlings of the agro-industrial complexes. Until recently, the regional systems of settling of three hierarchical levels were set up. Coodinative local systems of four levels were singled out from the regional system. The formation of the developed structure of the local systems of settling was carried out alongside with the purposeful development of their centers. The present process of the formation of the settling system is spontaneous to a considerable extent. Nowadays, the territorial organization of Siberia is like a self-settled system. The number of population of the 4 % of the urbanized territory of the southern part of West en Siberia grew by 70 % during the last 30 years. Now it is more than a half of the whole population of the region. The earned investments, infrastructure and transport are concentrated here. In the agrarian zone the quantity of people reduced to a one third, thousands of settlements disappeared. The vacuum appears in the network of settlings. Along their boarders, zones of risky settlings are formed, where the amount of citizens decreases and the production becomes noneffective. The territories with the greatest potential form the attraction field around themselves. It influences the structure of settling, economy. The streams of investments and migratory movements tend to the centres with high potential. The inner regularities of a settling determine the reinforcement of the contrasts and the irregular feature of a settling. The opposition to the objective regularities leads to the colossal expenditures and fails the expected results. The basis of the strategy in settling and in territorial organization of the regions should be the valuation of the probable changes in the territorial structure, mobilization of resources and search for the compromise way out of the unfavorable situation. The possibility of .","PeriodicalId":250552,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Third Russian-Korean International Symposium on Science and Technology. KORUS'99 (Cat. No.99EX362)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The regulation of the system of the settlements as the main factor of rural architecture in Siberia\",\"authors\":\"E.N. Lihachov\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/KORUS.1999.875887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Before the period of “reconstruction” the base of the scientific conception of the planning reorganization of the settlings in Siberia was the development of the network of settlements as the indivisible system of settling. This process gave the possibility to solve the problem of overcoming the differences between the city and the village; reduced the grouth of large cities and developed the small and middle-sizen ones. Moreover, the development of small towns, as the centres of rural districts, was one of the main tasks in improvement of territorial production organization. In the 1980-s the cultural relations between small and large towns, villages and towns has considerably increased. The production ties strengthened. The territorial-production and agroindustrial complexes and societies were formed. The concentration of production was carried out on the base of combination and specialization. The interfamily ties in the socio-cultural sphere were developing. The integration of towns and villages into a town-building formation on a regional scale was carried out the system of settling in Siberia. The following economic and social problems were planned: the use of natural resources of the territory, the development of the agrarian production and its transference on the industrial basis, the equalization of the living standards of the rural and city dwellers, the development of transport communication. All in all, during the 197080-s, the number of city dwellers were increasing by 2-2,5 % annually, but the number of rural dwellers were decreasing by 1-3 %. The greatest concentration of the inhabitants were marked in the large cities (about 50 Yo of the country’s population). Most of the rural settlements were reorganized into the town settlings of the agro-industrial complexes. Until recently, the regional systems of settling of three hierarchical levels were set up. Coodinative local systems of four levels were singled out from the regional system. The formation of the developed structure of the local systems of settling was carried out alongside with the purposeful development of their centers. The present process of the formation of the settling system is spontaneous to a considerable extent. Nowadays, the territorial organization of Siberia is like a self-settled system. The number of population of the 4 % of the urbanized territory of the southern part of West en Siberia grew by 70 % during the last 30 years. Now it is more than a half of the whole population of the region. The earned investments, infrastructure and transport are concentrated here. In the agrarian zone the quantity of people reduced to a one third, thousands of settlements disappeared. The vacuum appears in the network of settlings. Along their boarders, zones of risky settlings are formed, where the amount of citizens decreases and the production becomes noneffective. The territories with the greatest potential form the attraction field around themselves. It influences the structure of settling, economy. The streams of investments and migratory movements tend to the centres with high potential. The inner regularities of a settling determine the reinforcement of the contrasts and the irregular feature of a settling. The opposition to the objective regularities leads to the colossal expenditures and fails the expected results. The basis of the strategy in settling and in territorial organization of the regions should be the valuation of the probable changes in the territorial structure, mobilization of resources and search for the compromise way out of the unfavorable situation. The possibility of .\",\"PeriodicalId\":250552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Third Russian-Korean International Symposium on Science and Technology. KORUS'99 (Cat. No.99EX362)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Third Russian-Korean International Symposium on Science and Technology. KORUS'99 (Cat. No.99EX362)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/KORUS.1999.875887\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Third Russian-Korean International Symposium on Science and Technology. KORUS'99 (Cat. No.99EX362)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/KORUS.1999.875887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在“重建”时期之前,西伯利亚聚落规划重组的科学构想的基础是作为不可分割的聚落体系的聚落网络的发展。这一过程为克服城市与乡村之间的差异提供了可能;减少大城市的增长,发展中小城市。此外,作为农村地区中心的小城镇的发展是改善领土生产组织的主要任务之一。20世纪80年代,城乡之间的文化联系有了很大的发展。生产关系加强了。土地生产和农工综合体和社会形成。生产的集中是在组合和专业化的基础上进行的。社会文化领域的家庭间关系正在发展。在西伯利亚的定居制度中,城镇和村庄在区域尺度上整合为城镇建筑形式。计划了下列经济和社会问题:领土自然资源的利用,农业生产的发展及其在工业基础上的转移,城乡居民生活水平的平等,交通通讯的发展。总而言之,在20世纪70年代至80年代,城市居民的数量以每年2- 2.5%的速度增长,而农村居民的数量却以每年1- 3%的速度减少。居民最集中的地方是大城市(约占全国人口的50%)。大部分农村居民点被重组为农工综合体的城镇居民点。直到最近,才建立了三级的区域落户制度。从区域系统中挑出四个层次的地方协调系统。地方定居系统的发达结构的形成是与它们的中心有目的的发展一起进行的。目前沉降体系的形成过程在很大程度上是自发的。如今,西伯利亚的领土组织就像一个自治系统。西西伯利亚南部4%的城市化地区的人口数量在过去30年里增长了70%。现在它占了整个地区人口的一半以上。赚来的投资、基础设施和交通都集中在这里。在农业区,人口数量减少到三分之一,数千个定居点消失了。真空出现在沉降网络中。沿着它们的边界,形成了危险的定居点,在那里,居民数量减少,生产变得无效。潜力最大的区域在自身周围形成引力场。它影响沉降结构、经济。投资和移徙流动流向具有高潜力的中心。沉降的内在规律性决定了对比的增强性和沉降的不规则性。与客观规律的对立导致了巨大的支出,未能达到预期的效果。各区域的定居和领土组织战略的基础应该是评估领土结构可能发生的变化、调动资源和寻求摆脱不利局势的折衷办法。的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The regulation of the system of the settlements as the main factor of rural architecture in Siberia
Before the period of “reconstruction” the base of the scientific conception of the planning reorganization of the settlings in Siberia was the development of the network of settlements as the indivisible system of settling. This process gave the possibility to solve the problem of overcoming the differences between the city and the village; reduced the grouth of large cities and developed the small and middle-sizen ones. Moreover, the development of small towns, as the centres of rural districts, was one of the main tasks in improvement of territorial production organization. In the 1980-s the cultural relations between small and large towns, villages and towns has considerably increased. The production ties strengthened. The territorial-production and agroindustrial complexes and societies were formed. The concentration of production was carried out on the base of combination and specialization. The interfamily ties in the socio-cultural sphere were developing. The integration of towns and villages into a town-building formation on a regional scale was carried out the system of settling in Siberia. The following economic and social problems were planned: the use of natural resources of the territory, the development of the agrarian production and its transference on the industrial basis, the equalization of the living standards of the rural and city dwellers, the development of transport communication. All in all, during the 197080-s, the number of city dwellers were increasing by 2-2,5 % annually, but the number of rural dwellers were decreasing by 1-3 %. The greatest concentration of the inhabitants were marked in the large cities (about 50 Yo of the country’s population). Most of the rural settlements were reorganized into the town settlings of the agro-industrial complexes. Until recently, the regional systems of settling of three hierarchical levels were set up. Coodinative local systems of four levels were singled out from the regional system. The formation of the developed structure of the local systems of settling was carried out alongside with the purposeful development of their centers. The present process of the formation of the settling system is spontaneous to a considerable extent. Nowadays, the territorial organization of Siberia is like a self-settled system. The number of population of the 4 % of the urbanized territory of the southern part of West en Siberia grew by 70 % during the last 30 years. Now it is more than a half of the whole population of the region. The earned investments, infrastructure and transport are concentrated here. In the agrarian zone the quantity of people reduced to a one third, thousands of settlements disappeared. The vacuum appears in the network of settlings. Along their boarders, zones of risky settlings are formed, where the amount of citizens decreases and the production becomes noneffective. The territories with the greatest potential form the attraction field around themselves. It influences the structure of settling, economy. The streams of investments and migratory movements tend to the centres with high potential. The inner regularities of a settling determine the reinforcement of the contrasts and the irregular feature of a settling. The opposition to the objective regularities leads to the colossal expenditures and fails the expected results. The basis of the strategy in settling and in territorial organization of the regions should be the valuation of the probable changes in the territorial structure, mobilization of resources and search for the compromise way out of the unfavorable situation. The possibility of .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信