M. Borenstein, L. Hedges, J. Higgins, Hannah R. Rothstein
{"title":"辛普森悖论","authors":"M. Borenstein, L. Hedges, J. Higgins, Hannah R. Rothstein","doi":"10.1002/9780470743386.CH33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A prominent university was accused of gender discrimination in its graduate admission policies. The difference seemed to be too large to be due just to chance. Here are the numbers: Gender Applicants % Admitted Men 8,442 44% Women 4,321 35% But an examination of the admissions of individual departments revealed no such bias. Instead, there was a small bias in favor of admitting women. Here are the numbers for the main departments: Department Men Women Applicants % Admitted Applicants % Admitted A 825 62% 108 82% B 560 63% 25 68% C 325 37% 593 34% D 417 33% 375 35% E 191 28% 393 24% F 272 6% 341 7% This occured because women were applying to competitive departments with a low rate of admissions, while men were applying to less competitive departments with high rates of admissions.","PeriodicalId":105695,"journal":{"name":"Introduction to Meta‐Analysis","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simpson's Paradox\",\"authors\":\"M. Borenstein, L. Hedges, J. Higgins, Hannah R. Rothstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/9780470743386.CH33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A prominent university was accused of gender discrimination in its graduate admission policies. The difference seemed to be too large to be due just to chance. Here are the numbers: Gender Applicants % Admitted Men 8,442 44% Women 4,321 35% But an examination of the admissions of individual departments revealed no such bias. Instead, there was a small bias in favor of admitting women. Here are the numbers for the main departments: Department Men Women Applicants % Admitted Applicants % Admitted A 825 62% 108 82% B 560 63% 25 68% C 325 37% 593 34% D 417 33% 375 35% E 191 28% 393 24% F 272 6% 341 7% This occured because women were applying to competitive departments with a low rate of admissions, while men were applying to less competitive departments with high rates of admissions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Introduction to Meta‐Analysis\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Introduction to Meta‐Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386.CH33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Introduction to Meta‐Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386.CH33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
一所著名大学被指控在研究生录取政策中存在性别歧视。这种差异似乎太大了,不可能是偶然造成的。以下是数据:性别申请人%录取率男性8442 44%女性4321 35%但对个别院系录取情况的调查显示,没有这种偏见。相反,有一小部分人倾向于接纳女性。以下是主要院系的数字:院系男性女性申请人%被录取申请人%被录取A 825 62% 10882% B 560 63% 2568% C 325 37% 593 34% D 417 33% 3775 35% E 191 28% 393 24% F 272 6% 341 7%这是因为女性申请的是录取率低、竞争激烈的院系,而男性申请的是录取率高、竞争不那么激烈的院系。
A prominent university was accused of gender discrimination in its graduate admission policies. The difference seemed to be too large to be due just to chance. Here are the numbers: Gender Applicants % Admitted Men 8,442 44% Women 4,321 35% But an examination of the admissions of individual departments revealed no such bias. Instead, there was a small bias in favor of admitting women. Here are the numbers for the main departments: Department Men Women Applicants % Admitted Applicants % Admitted A 825 62% 108 82% B 560 63% 25 68% C 325 37% 593 34% D 417 33% 375 35% E 191 28% 393 24% F 272 6% 341 7% This occured because women were applying to competitive departments with a low rate of admissions, while men were applying to less competitive departments with high rates of admissions.