辛普森悖论

M. Borenstein, L. Hedges, J. Higgins, Hannah R. Rothstein
{"title":"辛普森悖论","authors":"M. Borenstein, L. Hedges, J. Higgins, Hannah R. Rothstein","doi":"10.1002/9780470743386.CH33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A prominent university was accused of gender discrimination in its graduate admission policies. The difference seemed to be too large to be due just to chance. Here are the numbers: Gender Applicants % Admitted Men 8,442 44% Women 4,321 35% But an examination of the admissions of individual departments revealed no such bias. Instead, there was a small bias in favor of admitting women. Here are the numbers for the main departments: Department Men Women Applicants % Admitted Applicants % Admitted A 825 62% 108 82% B 560 63% 25 68% C 325 37% 593 34% D 417 33% 375 35% E 191 28% 393 24% F 272 6% 341 7% This occured because women were applying to competitive departments with a low rate of admissions, while men were applying to less competitive departments with high rates of admissions.","PeriodicalId":105695,"journal":{"name":"Introduction to Meta‐Analysis","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simpson's Paradox\",\"authors\":\"M. Borenstein, L. Hedges, J. Higgins, Hannah R. Rothstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/9780470743386.CH33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A prominent university was accused of gender discrimination in its graduate admission policies. The difference seemed to be too large to be due just to chance. Here are the numbers: Gender Applicants % Admitted Men 8,442 44% Women 4,321 35% But an examination of the admissions of individual departments revealed no such bias. Instead, there was a small bias in favor of admitting women. Here are the numbers for the main departments: Department Men Women Applicants % Admitted Applicants % Admitted A 825 62% 108 82% B 560 63% 25 68% C 325 37% 593 34% D 417 33% 375 35% E 191 28% 393 24% F 272 6% 341 7% This occured because women were applying to competitive departments with a low rate of admissions, while men were applying to less competitive departments with high rates of admissions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Introduction to Meta‐Analysis\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Introduction to Meta‐Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386.CH33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Introduction to Meta‐Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386.CH33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一所著名大学被指控在研究生录取政策中存在性别歧视。这种差异似乎太大了,不可能是偶然造成的。以下是数据:性别申请人%录取率男性8442 44%女性4321 35%但对个别院系录取情况的调查显示,没有这种偏见。相反,有一小部分人倾向于接纳女性。以下是主要院系的数字:院系男性女性申请人%被录取申请人%被录取A 825 62% 10882% B 560 63% 2568% C 325 37% 593 34% D 417 33% 3775 35% E 191 28% 393 24% F 272 6% 341 7%这是因为女性申请的是录取率低、竞争激烈的院系,而男性申请的是录取率高、竞争不那么激烈的院系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simpson's Paradox
A prominent university was accused of gender discrimination in its graduate admission policies. The difference seemed to be too large to be due just to chance. Here are the numbers: Gender Applicants % Admitted Men 8,442 44% Women 4,321 35% But an examination of the admissions of individual departments revealed no such bias. Instead, there was a small bias in favor of admitting women. Here are the numbers for the main departments: Department Men Women Applicants % Admitted Applicants % Admitted A 825 62% 108 82% B 560 63% 25 68% C 325 37% 593 34% D 417 33% 375 35% E 191 28% 393 24% F 272 6% 341 7% This occured because women were applying to competitive departments with a low rate of admissions, while men were applying to less competitive departments with high rates of admissions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信