从形式语言描述构建符号模型检查器

Edmundo López Bóbeda, Maximilien Colange, Didier Buchs
{"title":"从形式语言描述构建符号模型检查器","authors":"Edmundo López Bóbeda, Maximilien Colange, Didier Buchs","doi":"10.1109/ACSD.2015.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main limit towards practical model-checking is the combinatorial explosion of the number of states. Among numerous solutions proposed to tackle this problem, Decision Diagrams (DDs) have been proved efficient. They are however low-level data structures: translating a high-level model to them can be cumbersome. Indeed, little work towards their better usability has been undertaken. We propose an abstract mechanism for the manipulation of DDs, where system transitions are described in terms of rewrite rules. We describe how basic rewrite rules can be assembled through strategies, to describe complex transition relations (e.g. involving various levels of synchronization among parallel components). The strategies and rewrite rules offer a higher-level interface, where the nature of underlying DD is hidden, close to high-level languages used to model concurrent systems. We also describe specific strategies that we use to automatically translate high-level modeling languages (namely Petri Nets and imperative languages) to rewrite strategies, ultimately translated in terms of operations on DDs.","PeriodicalId":162527,"journal":{"name":"2015 15th International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design","volume":"63 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building a Symbolic Model Checker from Formal Language Description\",\"authors\":\"Edmundo López Bóbeda, Maximilien Colange, Didier Buchs\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACSD.2015.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main limit towards practical model-checking is the combinatorial explosion of the number of states. Among numerous solutions proposed to tackle this problem, Decision Diagrams (DDs) have been proved efficient. They are however low-level data structures: translating a high-level model to them can be cumbersome. Indeed, little work towards their better usability has been undertaken. We propose an abstract mechanism for the manipulation of DDs, where system transitions are described in terms of rewrite rules. We describe how basic rewrite rules can be assembled through strategies, to describe complex transition relations (e.g. involving various levels of synchronization among parallel components). The strategies and rewrite rules offer a higher-level interface, where the nature of underlying DD is hidden, close to high-level languages used to model concurrent systems. We also describe specific strategies that we use to automatically translate high-level modeling languages (namely Petri Nets and imperative languages) to rewrite strategies, ultimately translated in terms of operations on DDs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 15th International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design\",\"volume\":\"63 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 15th International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSD.2015.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 15th International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSD.2015.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

实际模型检验的主要限制是状态数的组合爆炸。在解决这个问题的众多解决方案中,决策图(dd)已被证明是有效的。然而,它们是低级数据结构:将高级模型转换为它们可能很麻烦。事实上,对它们更好的可用性所做的工作很少。我们提出了一种抽象的dd操作机制,其中系统转换用重写规则来描述。我们描述了如何通过策略组装基本重写规则,以描述复杂的转换关系(例如,涉及并行组件之间不同级别的同步)。策略和重写规则提供了一个更高级的接口,其中隐藏了底层DD的本质,接近于用于为并发系统建模的高级语言。我们还描述了用于自动翻译高级建模语言(即Petri网和命令式语言)以重写策略的特定策略,最终根据dd上的操作进行翻译。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building a Symbolic Model Checker from Formal Language Description
The main limit towards practical model-checking is the combinatorial explosion of the number of states. Among numerous solutions proposed to tackle this problem, Decision Diagrams (DDs) have been proved efficient. They are however low-level data structures: translating a high-level model to them can be cumbersome. Indeed, little work towards their better usability has been undertaken. We propose an abstract mechanism for the manipulation of DDs, where system transitions are described in terms of rewrite rules. We describe how basic rewrite rules can be assembled through strategies, to describe complex transition relations (e.g. involving various levels of synchronization among parallel components). The strategies and rewrite rules offer a higher-level interface, where the nature of underlying DD is hidden, close to high-level languages used to model concurrent systems. We also describe specific strategies that we use to automatically translate high-level modeling languages (namely Petri Nets and imperative languages) to rewrite strategies, ultimately translated in terms of operations on DDs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信