使用简单的虚拟测试标准化视觉康复

S. Maidenbaum, A. Amedi
{"title":"使用简单的虚拟测试标准化视觉康复","authors":"S. Maidenbaum, A. Amedi","doi":"10.1109/ICVR46560.2019.8994431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many different visual rehabilitation approaches are being utilized to offer visual information to the blind. User proficiency and functional ability are currently evaluated either via ad-hoc tests or via standardized visual tests which are not sensitive enough in the range of extreme low vision. Unfortunately, this is the functional level that these approaches typically offer. This is especially important as the main criteria by which most users will judge the efficacy of these rehabilitation approaches is by the functional benefits it grants them. Furthermore, currently, there are no accepted benchmarks or clear comparative testing of each rehabilitation approach, leading to the development of many new aids but the practical adoption of few. Combined these indicate a need to add standardized functional tests to this evaluation toolbox. Indeed, several functional tests have recently been suggested but their adoption has been very limited. Here, we review current tests and then conduct a formative study consulting experts in the field to map issues with current standardization attempts. This formative study offered a list of practical design suggestions for functional standardization tests. We then suggest using simple virtual environments as one such family of tests. Virtual scenarios meet many of the experts’ suggestions - they are easy to share, flexible, affordable, safe, identical wherever run, can be run by a single operator and offer control over external parameters enabling a focus on the offered visual information. Finally, we demonstrate this approach via a freely available virtual version of a relatively standard functional test - finding a door - in a 10-minute paradigm which includes 30 trials. We find that congenitally-blind and sighted-blindfolded subjects cannot perform this task without the device, but that they perform it successfully with it, demonstrating the tests’ potential viability.","PeriodicalId":179905,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardizing Visual Rehabilitation using Simple Virtual Tests\",\"authors\":\"S. Maidenbaum, A. Amedi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICVR46560.2019.8994431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many different visual rehabilitation approaches are being utilized to offer visual information to the blind. User proficiency and functional ability are currently evaluated either via ad-hoc tests or via standardized visual tests which are not sensitive enough in the range of extreme low vision. Unfortunately, this is the functional level that these approaches typically offer. This is especially important as the main criteria by which most users will judge the efficacy of these rehabilitation approaches is by the functional benefits it grants them. Furthermore, currently, there are no accepted benchmarks or clear comparative testing of each rehabilitation approach, leading to the development of many new aids but the practical adoption of few. Combined these indicate a need to add standardized functional tests to this evaluation toolbox. Indeed, several functional tests have recently been suggested but their adoption has been very limited. Here, we review current tests and then conduct a formative study consulting experts in the field to map issues with current standardization attempts. This formative study offered a list of practical design suggestions for functional standardization tests. We then suggest using simple virtual environments as one such family of tests. Virtual scenarios meet many of the experts’ suggestions - they are easy to share, flexible, affordable, safe, identical wherever run, can be run by a single operator and offer control over external parameters enabling a focus on the offered visual information. Finally, we demonstrate this approach via a freely available virtual version of a relatively standard functional test - finding a door - in a 10-minute paradigm which includes 30 trials. We find that congenitally-blind and sighted-blindfolded subjects cannot perform this task without the device, but that they perform it successfully with it, demonstrating the tests’ potential viability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVR46560.2019.8994431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVR46560.2019.8994431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

许多不同的视觉康复方法正在被用来向盲人提供视觉信息。用户熟练程度和功能能力目前是通过特别测试或标准化视觉测试来评估的,这些测试在极低视力范围内不够敏感。不幸的是,这是这些方法通常提供的功能级别。这一点尤其重要,因为大多数使用者判断这些康复方法疗效的主要标准是它给他们带来的功能上的好处。此外,目前对每一种康复方法没有公认的基准或明确的比较测试,导致开发了许多新的辅助工具,但实际采用的很少。综合这些表明需要向此评估工具箱添加标准化功能测试。事实上,最近已经提出了一些功能测试,但它们的采用非常有限。在这里,我们回顾当前的测试,然后进行形成性研究,咨询该领域的专家,以映射当前标准化尝试的问题。这项形成性研究为功能标准化测试提供了一系列实用的设计建议。然后,我们建议使用简单的虚拟环境作为这样的测试系列之一。虚拟场景满足了许多专家的建议——它们易于共享、灵活、经济、安全、在任何地方运行都是相同的,可以由一个操作人员运行,并提供对外部参数的控制,从而专注于提供的视觉信息。最后,我们通过一个免费提供的虚拟版本的相对标准的功能测试来证明这种方法——寻找一扇门——在一个10分钟的范例中,包括30次试验。我们发现,先天失明和被蒙住眼睛的受试者如果没有这个设备就无法完成这项任务,但他们有了这个设备就成功地完成了任务,这证明了测试的潜在可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Standardizing Visual Rehabilitation using Simple Virtual Tests
Many different visual rehabilitation approaches are being utilized to offer visual information to the blind. User proficiency and functional ability are currently evaluated either via ad-hoc tests or via standardized visual tests which are not sensitive enough in the range of extreme low vision. Unfortunately, this is the functional level that these approaches typically offer. This is especially important as the main criteria by which most users will judge the efficacy of these rehabilitation approaches is by the functional benefits it grants them. Furthermore, currently, there are no accepted benchmarks or clear comparative testing of each rehabilitation approach, leading to the development of many new aids but the practical adoption of few. Combined these indicate a need to add standardized functional tests to this evaluation toolbox. Indeed, several functional tests have recently been suggested but their adoption has been very limited. Here, we review current tests and then conduct a formative study consulting experts in the field to map issues with current standardization attempts. This formative study offered a list of practical design suggestions for functional standardization tests. We then suggest using simple virtual environments as one such family of tests. Virtual scenarios meet many of the experts’ suggestions - they are easy to share, flexible, affordable, safe, identical wherever run, can be run by a single operator and offer control over external parameters enabling a focus on the offered visual information. Finally, we demonstrate this approach via a freely available virtual version of a relatively standard functional test - finding a door - in a 10-minute paradigm which includes 30 trials. We find that congenitally-blind and sighted-blindfolded subjects cannot perform this task without the device, but that they perform it successfully with it, demonstrating the tests’ potential viability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信