Youtube课堂互动视频中藐视格言的性别表征

Oktazsya Marjelina Lorenza, Safnil Arsyad, Syafryadin Syafryadin
{"title":"Youtube课堂互动视频中藐视格言的性别表征","authors":"Oktazsya Marjelina Lorenza, Safnil Arsyad, Syafryadin Syafryadin","doi":"10.25157/jall.v7i1.9216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the flouting types of maxim in classroom interaction videos on YouTube. The aims of this study are to find out the flouting types of maxim and also the gender representation of it. Descriptive qualitative method was used. The corpus of the study were 10 classroom interaction videos that were taken from YouTube. Grice’s theory was used to find and analyze the flouting types of maxim found in the video, those are; maxim of quality, quantity, relevance, and manner. The result showed that those four types of flouting maxim were found in the classroom interaction videos on YouTube. The highest flouting maxims found were maxim of quantity, relevance and manner and the least one is maxim of quality. This is probably because the speaker wants to build trust and cheer the hearer. The findings of the second research question shows that male was the most dominant gender flouting the maxims. Based on the results and limitation of the study, it is recommended for further research to take the data directly to schools to compare videos taken from YouTube and those taken directly from schools.","PeriodicalId":282686,"journal":{"name":"JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Representation of Flouting Maxim in Classroom Interaction Videos on Youtube\",\"authors\":\"Oktazsya Marjelina Lorenza, Safnil Arsyad, Syafryadin Syafryadin\",\"doi\":\"10.25157/jall.v7i1.9216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes the flouting types of maxim in classroom interaction videos on YouTube. The aims of this study are to find out the flouting types of maxim and also the gender representation of it. Descriptive qualitative method was used. The corpus of the study were 10 classroom interaction videos that were taken from YouTube. Grice’s theory was used to find and analyze the flouting types of maxim found in the video, those are; maxim of quality, quantity, relevance, and manner. The result showed that those four types of flouting maxim were found in the classroom interaction videos on YouTube. The highest flouting maxims found were maxim of quantity, relevance and manner and the least one is maxim of quality. This is probably because the speaker wants to build trust and cheer the hearer. The findings of the second research question shows that male was the most dominant gender flouting the maxims. Based on the results and limitation of the study, it is recommended for further research to take the data directly to schools to compare videos taken from YouTube and those taken directly from schools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25157/jall.v7i1.9216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25157/jall.v7i1.9216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了YouTube课堂互动视频中格言的嘲弄类型。本研究的目的是找出格言的轻蔑类型及其性别表征。采用描述性定性方法。该研究的语料库是从YouTube上获取的10个课堂互动视频。运用Grice的理论对视频中出现的格言嘲讽类型进行了分析,分别是;质量、数量、相关性和方式的准则。结果表明,在YouTube的课堂互动视频中发现了这四种类型的嘲弄格言。最受嘲弄的格言是“数量格言”、“相关性格言”和“方式格言”,最不受嘲弄的格言是“质量格言”。这可能是因为说话者想要建立信任,让听者高兴起来。第二个研究问题的结果表明,男性是蔑视格言的最主要性别。基于研究的结果和局限性,建议进一步的研究将数据直接带到学校,比较从YouTube上获取的视频和直接从学校获取的视频。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender Representation of Flouting Maxim in Classroom Interaction Videos on Youtube
This article analyzes the flouting types of maxim in classroom interaction videos on YouTube. The aims of this study are to find out the flouting types of maxim and also the gender representation of it. Descriptive qualitative method was used. The corpus of the study were 10 classroom interaction videos that were taken from YouTube. Grice’s theory was used to find and analyze the flouting types of maxim found in the video, those are; maxim of quality, quantity, relevance, and manner. The result showed that those four types of flouting maxim were found in the classroom interaction videos on YouTube. The highest flouting maxims found were maxim of quantity, relevance and manner and the least one is maxim of quality. This is probably because the speaker wants to build trust and cheer the hearer. The findings of the second research question shows that male was the most dominant gender flouting the maxims. Based on the results and limitation of the study, it is recommended for further research to take the data directly to schools to compare videos taken from YouTube and those taken directly from schools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信