乌克兰刑事诉讼中诉诸司法的概念和内容

O. Kuchynska, O. Shchyhol
{"title":"乌克兰刑事诉讼中诉诸司法的概念和内容","authors":"O. Kuchynska, O. Shchyhol","doi":"10.17721/2413-5372.2019.3/20-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Access to justice is a fundamental principle of criminal proceedings and one of the most important guarantees of criminal proceedings participants’ rights. Nevertheless, nowadays there is no single approach to concept and content of this legal category. The reason is a large number of related and similar terms which apply to domestic legislation of Ukraine and international legal acts, as well as lack of established scientific grounds regarding legal nature of access to justice, its purpose and essence.\n\nThus, the purpose of the article is: 1) to analyze current legislation, international standards and scientific background in the domain of access to justice; 2) to define concept and content of access to justice in criminal proceedings of Ukraine.\n\nIt needs to be mentioned that in comparison with civil, commercial and administrative proceedings, criminal procedural law regulates social relations which involve the most substantial interference with human rights. The high level of interference and limitations surely generates requirements for establishing in criminal proceedings certain guarantees (including access to justice), which have to be effective and efficient. However, this cannot be achieved without thorough and solid legal terminology which should exclude ambiguous interpretation of any legal categories and provide a basis for their proper understanding. Therefore, criminal proceedings require additional attention even to small details: subtleties of juridical technique, language constructs and so forth. In this regard, as it has already been mentioned, concept and content of access to justice in criminal proceedings of Ukraine remains problematic.\n\nIt is concluded that the concept of access to justice (in criminal proceedings and in general) is insufficiently explored and current legislation contains a number of similar definitions with uncertain difference remaining between them. The same applies to the content of access to justice which has ambiguous interpretations in legal literature. It is suggested to streamline legal terminology in regard to access to justice.","PeriodicalId":399656,"journal":{"name":"Herald of criminal justice","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concept and content of access to justice in criminal proceedings of Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"O. Kuchynska, O. Shchyhol\",\"doi\":\"10.17721/2413-5372.2019.3/20-30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Access to justice is a fundamental principle of criminal proceedings and one of the most important guarantees of criminal proceedings participants’ rights. Nevertheless, nowadays there is no single approach to concept and content of this legal category. The reason is a large number of related and similar terms which apply to domestic legislation of Ukraine and international legal acts, as well as lack of established scientific grounds regarding legal nature of access to justice, its purpose and essence.\\n\\nThus, the purpose of the article is: 1) to analyze current legislation, international standards and scientific background in the domain of access to justice; 2) to define concept and content of access to justice in criminal proceedings of Ukraine.\\n\\nIt needs to be mentioned that in comparison with civil, commercial and administrative proceedings, criminal procedural law regulates social relations which involve the most substantial interference with human rights. The high level of interference and limitations surely generates requirements for establishing in criminal proceedings certain guarantees (including access to justice), which have to be effective and efficient. However, this cannot be achieved without thorough and solid legal terminology which should exclude ambiguous interpretation of any legal categories and provide a basis for their proper understanding. Therefore, criminal proceedings require additional attention even to small details: subtleties of juridical technique, language constructs and so forth. In this regard, as it has already been mentioned, concept and content of access to justice in criminal proceedings of Ukraine remains problematic.\\n\\nIt is concluded that the concept of access to justice (in criminal proceedings and in general) is insufficiently explored and current legislation contains a number of similar definitions with uncertain difference remaining between them. The same applies to the content of access to justice which has ambiguous interpretations in legal literature. It is suggested to streamline legal terminology in regard to access to justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herald of criminal justice\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herald of criminal justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-5372.2019.3/20-30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of criminal justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-5372.2019.3/20-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

司法公正是刑事诉讼的一项基本原则,也是刑事诉讼参与人权利的重要保障之一。然而,目前对这一法律范畴的概念和内容并没有统一的看法。其原因是有大量相关和类似的术语适用于乌克兰的国内立法和国际法律行为,以及缺乏关于诉诸司法的法律性质、目的和本质的既定科学依据。因此,本文的目的是:1)分析司法救助领域的现行立法、国际标准和科学背景;2)界定乌克兰刑事诉讼中诉诸司法的概念和内容。需要指出的是,与民事、商事和行政诉讼程序相比,刑事诉讼法规定的社会关系涉及对人权的最实质性的干涉。高度的干涉和限制必然要求在刑事诉讼中确立某些保障(包括诉诸司法),这些保障必须切实有效。但是,如果没有彻底和坚实的法律术语,就无法做到这一点,这些术语应排除对任何法律类别的含糊解释,并为正确理解它们提供基础。因此,刑事诉讼甚至需要额外注意小细节:司法技术的微妙之处、语言结构等等。在这方面,正如已经提到的,乌克兰在刑事诉讼中诉诸司法的概念和内容仍然存在问题。结论是,(在刑事诉讼和一般情况下)诉诸司法的概念没有得到充分探讨,目前的立法载有一些类似的定义,它们之间仍然存在不确定的差异。这同样适用于在法律文献中有模棱两可解释的诉诸司法的内容。建议精简有关诉诸司法的法律术语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concept and content of access to justice in criminal proceedings of Ukraine
Access to justice is a fundamental principle of criminal proceedings and one of the most important guarantees of criminal proceedings participants’ rights. Nevertheless, nowadays there is no single approach to concept and content of this legal category. The reason is a large number of related and similar terms which apply to domestic legislation of Ukraine and international legal acts, as well as lack of established scientific grounds regarding legal nature of access to justice, its purpose and essence. Thus, the purpose of the article is: 1) to analyze current legislation, international standards and scientific background in the domain of access to justice; 2) to define concept and content of access to justice in criminal proceedings of Ukraine. It needs to be mentioned that in comparison with civil, commercial and administrative proceedings, criminal procedural law regulates social relations which involve the most substantial interference with human rights. The high level of interference and limitations surely generates requirements for establishing in criminal proceedings certain guarantees (including access to justice), which have to be effective and efficient. However, this cannot be achieved without thorough and solid legal terminology which should exclude ambiguous interpretation of any legal categories and provide a basis for their proper understanding. Therefore, criminal proceedings require additional attention even to small details: subtleties of juridical technique, language constructs and so forth. In this regard, as it has already been mentioned, concept and content of access to justice in criminal proceedings of Ukraine remains problematic. It is concluded that the concept of access to justice (in criminal proceedings and in general) is insufficiently explored and current legislation contains a number of similar definitions with uncertain difference remaining between them. The same applies to the content of access to justice which has ambiguous interpretations in legal literature. It is suggested to streamline legal terminology in regard to access to justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信